Can you answer the question about recruits reading this board? Why does it always come back to other people changing? I want to know why you, the person who owns this place, are so different? Do you often change your beliefs and actions because other people are doing it?
I really don't think I owe you or anyone else any substantiation of my fan support.
I get that people are frustrated with bad losses, so am I, but is this not a rebuilding year?
Yes.....so why is it seemingly wrong for people to question things such as style of play, effort, the starting lineup (which has only changed once and that was due to injury), etc.....?
As you say, this IS a rebuilding year and we have scholarship players just sitting on the bench!
Nevermind......we're not supposed to question this coach.....yet........:roll:
Please, Braves start winning. Can't take much more of this.
You can feel free to question decisions of the coach. I don't know why you can't.
For some reason I thought the coach was off limits because he's only playing the hand he was dealt. I just don't see that as a reason not to question the coach for another 2-3 years.
I don't think they are off limits. I think many, myself included, realize you don't rebuild anything in 1 year (without your own recruits). Many are probably cognizant of the fact that this is a marathon, not a sprint.
I agree with that and have said all along that I don't hold GF completely responsible for wins/losses until year 3, but there are people out there that seem to believe this coach should not be questioned at all because he's only playing the terrible hand he was dealt. To me, that just doesn't make sense!
I found all of these in less than 1 minute:
"I applaud the effort of our team."
"I am not panicked because I had zero expectations other than effort. The play hard, they jump high, they give maximum physical effort."
"I applaud everyone who is involved with the program. Through all these challenges, they have stuck together and not been a problem off the floor, either."
"Tom Crean
Year 1 -- 6 wins, 25 losses; 1-17 in Big 10
Year 2 -- 10-21; 4-14 in B10
Year 3 -- 12-20; 3-15 in B10
Year 4 -- 13-1; 1-1 in Big10... Ranked #12 in Country... so far.
Patience Bradley Nation."
Talking about Coach Ford
"Utmost respect to Bradley's tradition, fans & administration
-With absolute practicality. He is honest about where the program is, where it needs to be, what needs to happen for it to get there, and his role in all of that
-Button-down demeanor
-Consummate professional-he is the coach's coach. He mentioned on his program yesterday, he rarely eats on game day because he is focusing on too many things to get ready for the game"
"I don't think BU or Peoria will ever be embarrassed by having Geno Ford as its coach. He is funny, polite, well-spoken, classy, and doesn't take himself too seriously."
"I like everything SO FAR. Xs & Os, responsibility, and candidness. BUT, it's still waaay too early. We know almost nothing about his ability to recruit talent to the Hilltop
I will agree that it's not 100% positive. I also think it is ok and fair to judge whether or not players are up to the level of play that is required to win. That has been discussed here as well.
I always hope BU upgrades its talent. Even if we had 2 or 3 all-conference guys, I would always hope to get even more talented guys.
Does anyone want to get players that aren't talented????
I don't understand how it's bad to hope we get in guys that can run what Geno would like to run.
I am looking at much different posts...
"We all know Taylor isn't necessarily the sharpest knife in the drawer"
"it's hard not to find enough adjectives at how bad this team is at times"
"Amen...clean out this garbage roster."
" However, they aren't good basketball players" look familiar
I could go on, but you can find some positive posts, but the Majority is not such...and most of that boards action has taken to ridiculing this board...
I'm still trying to figure out who exactly thinks Bradley would have been "great" this year if JL were still here.![]()
Nevermind......we're not supposed to question this coach.....yet........:roll:
I realize I'm a bit more of a passive observer than active poster than I used to be, but I still read the boards a ton. I have no stake in bashing anyone past or present (what does that achieve?), but to say that the overall tone of the board hasn't changed in the past year (approximately) is just laughable.
I've grown so tired of the criticism of "fandom". Sorry, if you're taking the time to read and post on a message board, you're clearly a diehard fan and want the kids on the team to be successful. I think every one of the "regulars" on here loves Bradley and wants the best for it.
The overall framed perception I get from reading has gone from:
"Things might not be perfect, we're here to support the team as a board, no matter what."
to ...
"We're still here to always support the team, but don't blame us that BU is absolutely terrible this season. You get what you asked for with a coaching change."
It's always been about expectations. Some were content with winning records, 4-6 finishes in conference and very likable coach that was a star on one of the best BU teams ever. Others wanted a different voice because they cared more about winning conference championships, building the program to a higher level, etc.
The fact that is always under the surface but rarely gets said is that if you had a close bond to the old coach, you'd be much more likely to find a hundred reasons to want to keep him around. If you didn't know him personally or simply thought a change could be a shot in the arm, you'd be much more willing for a change.
Everyone falls into one of these two camps - and that isn't a bad thing, we all want to win. But please don't claim that things haven't changed.
I never said you shouldn't question the coach's decisions. I'm one of the many in the camp that thinks DSE should play the PG spot and Walt would be better served as the 2 guard.
What I said was that people shouldn't already be questioning if he should be the coach. Give the guy some time to build the program. Question his tactics all you like, just don't write him off before he's even had a chance to get started.