• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Great Article on Coach Stowell's double firing from BU

I bash Kirk quite a bit, but I thought that this was a good article. I also believe that Dr Cross needs to reinstate Joe Stowell to the Hall of Fame committee. Removing Stowell from that committee is sheer stupidity:!:
 
I bash Kirk quite a bit, but I thought that this was a good article. I also believe that Dr Cross needs to reinstate Joe Stowell to the Hall of Fame committee. Removing Stowell from that committee is sheer stupidity:!:

I TOTALLY AGREE:!::-x With all the changes in the last year, this one is over the top:!::-x Here is a guy that bleeds Red and White, been involved and done more for BU, BU BB/ ITS PLAYERS and BU Sports then just about anyone else affiliated with BU, getting a Royal F**k** by the Queen and her Court:-x
WHAT HELL IS GOING ON:roll::? Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee's
Thanks Kirk, for bringing this to light, Great Article:!:
 
Coach Stowell deserves better....a lesser man would have walked away years ago....thank God for men like Coach Stowell for having passion for the Hilltop like no other! :idea:
 
I'm usually not much of a KW fan but his instincts on this article are spot on. He backs up his opinion this time with common sense and facts. I also agree it should not be the announcers job, especially the color guy, to be a cheerleader.
 
Coach Stowell has always been one of if not the biggest supporter of Bradley University ever and I too wonder why they continue to fire him; why is this new administration running off all the good coaches and staff that have been loyal for so many years, the board needs to be watching what is happening very closely because things appear to be out of control.
 
If you ask me this can pretty much be traced back to Pres Glasser. If KK's still here Coach Stowell is in the booth.
 
Waiting to hear why this was absolutely a no-brainer decision for BU, how other schools are doing similar things, and anyone who doesn't agree that this is a great move for BU is just a hater.
 
Waiting to hear why this was absolutely a no-brainer decision for BU, how other schools are doing similar things, and anyone who doesn't agree that this is a great move for BU is just a hater.

I don't think anyone can even argue about the HOF committee, he should be the chairperson. But on the radio he was definitely weak, I think he should do pregame and then giveway to someone else (though I think I'd rather have him than DA).
 
I hope this is not a very stupid question, but was Coach released from the mens broadcasts because of budget cuts? I assume he'll only do the women's basketball contests at home, correct?
 
One can only imagine the Black Eye this gives BU to all the other schools, their fans, sports writers and anyone who new of anything of/about Coach Stowell and his long time association, dedication, and love for BU:rolleyes:
Just plain craze:rolleyes: Geeeeeeeeeeeeeeee's Just not right:?:-x
 
It had nothing to do with budget cuts, the job has never been a high-paying job. Both Bradley and WMBD wanted a team that would be together for every game, and Coach Stowell only wants to do home games. That would make the transition with Danny Adams difficult. There are other reasons, but not worth mentioning.

I love Coach Stowell, but it was time for a change. This was the right move, long overdue, and I congratulate BU, Dave and Danny, and WMBD. I appreciate all that Coach Stowell has given to BU in the years he was employed.

KW and the PJS, as usual, are trying to create a tempest in a teapot. This is simply not that big of a deal, and the motives of KW for trying to make it one are obvious.
 
It had nothing to do with budget cuts, the job has never been a high-paying job. Both Bradley and WMBD wanted a team that would be together for every game, and Coach Stowell only wants to do home games. That would make the transition with Danny Adams difficult. There are other reasons, but not worth mentioning.

I love Coach Stowell, but it was time for a change. This was the right move, long overdue, and I congratulate BU, Dave and Danny, and WMBD. I appreciate all that Coach Stowell has given to BU in the years he was employed.

KW and the PJS, as usual, are trying to create a tempest in a teapot. This is simply not that big of a deal, and the motives of KW for trying to make it one are obvious.
If you are talking about removing Stowell from the radio broadcast, then I could see how you would think that this is not a big deal. However, removing Stowell from the BU Hall of Fame committee is a classless act by Dr Cross and President Glasser:!:
 
It had nothing to do with budget cuts, the job has never been a high-paying job. Both Bradley and WMBD wanted a team that would be together for every game, and Coach Stowell only wants to do home games. That would make the transition with Danny Adams difficult. There are other reasons, but not worth mentioning.

I love Coach Stowell, but it was time for a change. This was the right move, long overdue, and I congratulate BU, Dave and Danny, and WMBD. I appreciate all that Coach Stowell has given to BU in the years he was employed.

KW and the PJS, as usual, are trying to create a tempest in a teapot. This is simply not that big of a deal, and the motives of KW for trying to make it one are obvious.

I sort of see where you are coming from Coach, but I'm not sure KW was making a big deal out of this. Obviously you know from many of my past posts that I am in no way a KW fan either, though I will be the first to credit him those rare times he gets things right. I think here he was stating facts and just stating that he disagreed with the decision of the administration. He did not call for anyone to quit or be fired, he just did not agree that the time was right to fire Coach Stowell, particularly from the HOF board.

That said, I too think it was not necessary to fire Stowell from the radio booth. I remember Harry Caray announcing for the Cubs long after he should have been let go since he was just not the same after his stroke. But Coach Stowell is still as sharp as a stick and is capable of being a commentator until the time comes that he no longer has the skills to do so. Agreed that maybe the three man booth arrangement did not work out, and at his age he did not feel like taking anymore road trips, but a split arrangement in having Adams call only road games while Stowell stays at home (both being a two man setup) would work fine for the next year or two until Adams gains the experience he needs to become a full time commentator. Perhaps instead of just dumping Stowell immediately, they should have given him one final year for a proper send off while Adams gets his feet wet. Either way I think the whole situation should have been handled better since you don't just push a legend out for the sake of it, especially a man who still has the capabilites to perform his job. There's plenty of time to establish a proper two man booth and Stowell could not be a better mentor for Adams to gain the experience he needs.

We may have to agree to disagree on the radio firing, but regarding the HOF firing, I think many agree that that was the more surprising firing and one that perplexes me the most. I'm hoping that the adminstration does do the right thing as they stated by reinstating him next year when the next three year vacancy opens up.
 
I have no problem with the article. I love Coach Stowell but agree with the decision to replace him on the men's broadcasts. He was never a great color guy and he had gotten even worse in recent years. He has a weak voice for radio and, in my opinion, was beginning to cross (no pun intended) the line with some of his comments and criticisms of the team and the coaching. I'm sure the university realizes that a stronger, more positive broadcast team would be a positive for both fan support, recruiting and player morale. Remember, BU controls the presentation of their product and they have a right to want a positive image portrayed at ALL times. This might not seem fair or right but remember, it's not BU's job to present a "fair and balanced" image. That job is for the media....... they are NOT on BU's payroll.

Now, removing Stowell from the HOF Committee is a whole other matter. What the he!! were they thinking! :evil: I can only presume that there is an untold story here regarding Stowell and BU. If not, this was just wrong for BU to do this! Couldn't this have been done differently BU?!
 
KW's take on removing him from the committee was spot on. No reason to do it.

Also seems like a pretty minor accommodation to have Stowell do home games only. Sure makes you wonder...
 
...spot on. No reason to do it.....

hmmm...clearly there are reasons....some seem to think things happen for "no reason"...
just maybe nobody here nor writing hit pieces really knows those reasons, but hey - that never stopped anyone beofre from drawing bad conclusions....
Why can't a private organization do as they wish without always being criticized? They basically employed the man for 55 years of his life
as well as gave him the opportunity to play college ball and get an education..
I have loved Coach Stowell for the more than 40 years I have known him and yet I am not at all surprised by this and it seems pretty benign actually.
The guy is 84 years old....how many schools employ people that long and yet get ripped when he's gone?? Only one I can think of.
..reading this stuff - it sounds like Bradley's never done a thing for the man and stabbed him in the back -- couldn't be further from the truth..
BTW-- the Egyptian National basketball team also let him go decades ago -- maybe let's ask them for a reason....
 
...I can only presume that there is an untold story here regarding Stowell and BU...

This may be the case, but the BU administration has the final say.
There is a reason the terms on the HOF committee are limited, and 2 other members of the committee also were not renewed, so this was not an action directed solely at Coach Stowell. And, he was replaced by Corky Robertson, who is every bit as loyal and knowledgeable about past Bradley sports figures as Stowell.

It is always hard for fans to accept changes like this, but I find it ironic that many of the fans who are the most vocal about this change are the same fans who demanded changes in BU administration, and then wanted to see those newly hired people make major changes in the athletics department.
Now we have seen a lot of changes in coaching and other athletic department personnel, which typically happens when administrators change. And yet with every change, many who wanted the change now act incredulous and question the moves.
 
hmmm...clearly there are reasons....some seem to think things happen for "no reason"...
just maybe nobody here nor writing hit pieces really knows those reasons, but hey - that never stopped anyone beofre from drawing bad conclusions....
Why can't a private organization do as they wish without always being criticized?

Don't take everyone so literally. Of course there are reasons. What I and I presume others who made similar comments mean is that there are no apparent good reasons. And until they are made known, people will draw conclusions based on the facts available.

Why can't a private Bradley fan share a thought without always being criticized?
 
Back
Top