Voted one more year. Then, hopefully he is so successful that he is here for life.
+1
Voted one more year. Then, hopefully he is so successful that he is here for life.
I actually think Jim would be better oof if he got paid for his 3 more years and left. Why should he put up with this kind of crap every year from people who have never coached a game in their lives.I think he deserves another year. God help Bradley if they fire him and bring in someone who doesn't know a thing about Bradley. We already have too many people in charge who know nothing about Bradleys history.
We also give JL poor marks on player development, but DSE and JP clearly emerged this year. AT and MK are still frustrating questions. Are they poor players, or are they not getting a fair chance to play in games and develop like DSE and JP?
quote]
The problem w/ AT & MK is we, the fan, only get to see that glimmer of promise in a game. The coaching staff see the mistakes in both practice & game situations. As for MK, I would not give up on him, if he stays, as I see real potential but potential we might not fully realize until his senior year. (something that happens to a lot of players in college)
We also give JL poor marks on player development, but DSE and JP clearly emerged this year. AT and MK are still frustrating questions. Are they poor players, or are they not getting a fair chance to play in games and develop like DSE and JP?
quote]
The problem w/ AT & MK is we, the fan, only get to see that glimmer of promise in a game. The coaching staff see the mistakes in both practice & game situations. As for MK, I would not give up on him, if he stays, as I see real potential but potential we might not fully realize until his senior year. (something that happens to a lot of players in college)
AT played with a lot of heart, and very well twice this year. First when we lost TB, and then when we lost JP. But there seems to be a problem sustaining it. If we could just get Sandra Bullock to give AT a "Blind Side" speech...
(But that speech did not happen in real life..)
Well, I gotta say it... it looks like the overwhelming majority of fans (almost 80%) here favor retaining Jim another year. We have had the fire-JL people telling us all year that it is the other way around, and that the majority of fans want him fired.
As a side note- there are hundreds of fans down here in St. Louis, including quite a lot of the "blue-hairs". I suspect most if not nearly all of these fans here in St. Louis do not have a laptop with them to vote in this poll. That means, in my estimation, that most people voting are the out-of-area fans, and the people who did not come to St. Louis. I have talked to numerous people down here, and I have not met anyone yet who wants Jim fired. So I believe that if these fans were added to the poll, it would be far more lopsided. The older fans don't tend to have computers or visit our site in great numbers anyway, and the huge majority of those older fans strongly support Jim Les.
So what I am saying, and others are free to disagree and I am sure there will be some who do, is that if this poll has any bias, IMO the bias strongly favors the fans who want Jim Les fired, since they tend to shout louder than the rest of us, and are more likely to stay home and not come to St. Louis. Even if you add a couple votes for the obnoxious, repeated rules-violating ones we have banned, it doesn't come close to equalling the hundreds of others who are down here in St. Louis and can't participate in the poll. I predict that by tomowwow, this poll will even more strongly favor retaining Jim, when those fans get home and vote.
Well, I gotta say it... it looks like the overwhelming majority of fans (almost 80%) here favor retaining Jim another year. We have had the fire-JL people telling us all year that it is the other way around, and that the majority of fans want him fired.
As a side note- there are hundreds of fans down here in St. Louis, including quite a lot of the "blue-hairs". I suspect most if not nearly all of these fans here in St. Louis do not have a laptop with them to vote in this poll. That means, in my estimation, that most people voting are the out-of-area fans, and the people who did not come to St. Louis. I have talked to numerous people down here, and I have not met anyone yet who wants Jim fired. So I believe that if these fans were added to the poll, it would be far more lopsided. The older fans don't tend to have computers or visit our site in great numbers anyway, and the huge majority of those older fans strongly support Jim Les.
So what I am saying, and others are free to disagree and I am sure there will be some who do, is that if this poll has any bias, IMO the bias strongly favors the fans who want Jim Les fired, since they tend to shout louder than the rest of us, and are more likely to stay home and not come to St. Louis. Even if you add a couple votes for the obnoxious, repeated rules-violating ones we have banned, it doesn't come close to equalling the hundreds of others who are down here in St. Louis and can't participate in the poll. I predict that by tomowwow, this poll will even more strongly favor retaining Jim, when those fans get home and vote.
If we could see who voted in the poll I bet you would be surprised. The people that you claim are so anti-JL probably voted for another year. Just because people express their disgust in this season doesn't necessarily mean they want JL to be fired.
In all honesty, I thought that we should have fired JL until we saw the team improve during the last month! Had the poll been taken in the middle of January, I think that the results would have been very different!
Well, I gotta say it... it looks like the overwhelming majority of fans (almost 80%) here favor retaining Jim another year. We have had the fire-JL people telling us all year that it is the other way around, and that the majority of fans want him fired.
As a side note- there are hundreds of fans down here in St. Louis, including quite a lot of the "blue-hairs". I suspect most if not nearly all of these fans here in St. Louis do not have a laptop with them to vote in this poll. That means, in my estimation, that most people voting are the out-of-area fans, and the people who did not come to St. Louis. I have talked to numerous people down here, and I have not met anyone yet who wants Jim fired. So I believe that if these fans were added to the poll, it would be far more lopsided. The older fans don't tend to have computers or visit our site in great numbers anyway, and the huge majority of those older fans strongly support Jim Les.
So what I am saying, and others are free to disagree and I am sure there will be some who do, is that if this poll has any bias, IMO the bias strongly favors the fans who want Jim Les fired, since they tend to shout louder than the rest of us, and are more likely to stay home and not come to St. Louis. Even if you add a couple votes for the obnoxious, repeated rules-violating ones we have banned, it doesn't come close to equalling the hundreds of others who are down here in St. Louis and can't participate in the poll. I predict that by tomowwow, this poll will even more strongly favor retaining Jim, when those fans get home and vote.
AT played with a lot of heart, and very well twice this year. First when we lost TB, and then when we lost JP. But there seems to be a problem sustaining it. If we could just get Sandra Bullock to give AT a "Blind Side" speech...
(But that speech did not happen in real life..)
Yeah, I don't know what we do with AT. He showed the other night against Drake, and even in a few spots last night that he has great potential (I know, maybe the most overused word in the English language sometimes). All I can say is sometimes things click when people least expect it, and maybe next year will be the year that Sticks can finally make a solidly consistent contribution to this team.
... I forget how we can see who voted for which option - can we still do this?