wily coyote
Active member
GOOD FANS DONT BOO, pretty simple
Amen
GOOD FANS DONT BOO, pretty simple
GOOD FANS DONT BOO, pretty simple
I actually liked giving it to DSE in that case. I think everyone in the stadium, including Indiana St., expected the ball to go to SM since he is one of our best free throw shooters but by giving it to DSE, it caught them a bit off guard. Then before they fouled DSE, you could see SM heading towards the other side of the court that was wide open. So if DSE didn't get fouled, he would've had SM wide open on the opposite side to avoid a double team and get fouled to go to the line.
I disagree on the 'fan enthusiasm' part. BU had a tremendous following out in Vegas, a large number of which were season ticket holders making the trek from Central Illinois. I think the home enthusiasm was first tempered by a pretty poor non-conference schedule (name-wise), poor scheduling date-wise (too much time in between games), and most importantly, dreadful performance on the home court. I would say perhaps enthusiasm has done its biggest nosedive in years, as we were at an all-time high after beating the Illini, and are nearing the lows of end of the Molinari era with 3 straight home losses in embarrassing fashion. Last night's crowd was announced at 8,618, but I think 6,500 was a more accurate number of people in the building. Sure, the weather wasn't ideal, but this is Central Illinois and it does snow from time to time. A product worth watching would have brought people out.
I actually liked giving it to DSE in that case. I think everyone in the stadium, including Indiana St., expected the ball to go to SM since he is one of our best free throw shooters but by giving it to DSE, it caught them a bit off guard. Then before they fouled DSE, you could see SM heading towards the other side of the court that was wide open. So if DSE didn't get fouled, he would've had SM wide open on the opposite side to avoid a double team and get fouled to go to the line.
GOOD FANS DONT BOO, pretty simple
Good thoughts. . .there are a variety of problems with the crowds at Carver.
First, many of the best seats are held by people who hold on to the seats for the prestige of it. . .not necessarily to attend every game. The games those people do attend, they just sit through. If it's a bigger name opponent, then they might be more actively involved.
Second, related point, is that there is still a culture of just going to socialize, not watch prime DI college basketball. Again, they might be more involved if its a bigger name opponent.
While there has been a great influx of younger Braves fans as alums from the 80's and 90's have started families and remained in the area, let's face it, our fan base still isn't any younger than it was 10 or even 15 years ago. Every year we get further removed from success those voices get a little weaker and their legs a little more tired. They have witnessed tremendous Bradley history firsthand and I have trouble calling them out. . .
So you have those things that can't really be changed because they largely support the thing.
Again, as I've always said, I empathize with the students and wish they were a more integral part of the atmosphere of Bradley games. But you can't just complain about the seating situation or not being included in games over breaks. . .you must force the change. That means organizing and going to every game, regardless of when it's played. You must be the change you wish to be. The attendance of students for games when school is in session is already drastically down from just two years ago.
In large part, a good product will do more to change the atmosphere at games than any drastic changes to the culture or seating.
Agree with you on most of this. One thing I disagree with is the student seating. I've been paying more attention to other games on the tube lately and practically every student section is behind the baskets. Guess what makes it so noticable is that there are actually students there.
If SM was not coming to the ball then that is a HUGE coaching mistake at the end of a game that was going to require critical free throws to be made. Your top free throw shooter should not be running anywhere other then to the ball.
I will never want the ball in the hands of someone who is shooting fts at a 47.6% clip when the game is on the line, let alone someone who right now shoots it so poorly and has missed 3 weeks of action.
You put the ball in the hands of the only 3 on this team who can shoot free throws:
Warren 81%
Brown 82.5%
SM 82.6%
DSE should not be receiving an inbounds pass in that situation.
Tell that to the Bears fans...
You're wrong:!:
Everyone who pays has the right to do what they feel necessary to motivate and make their voice heard minus profanity or throwing anything...
Good fans don't boo? Tell that to fans in NY and Philadelphia![]()
That's why I can't stand any Philly pro teams. It's also why I have always said unabashedly that Philadelphians are the world's rudest people.
I have always said that BU fans are not very loud. I use to go to Butler games when I lived in Indy and they would have 5000 at Hinkle and it woudl be much louder then Carver w/ 10,000. The best game I remember @ Carver was right after we came eoff the sweet 16 year when they had the coud stand for the 1st 4 minutes and last 4 minutes of each half. It actaully got kind of loud for Carver.
A great home court advantage will not be built by a crowd that "boo's" really well. (and please don't suggest that BU fans should aspire to be NY or God forbid Philly fans-fortunately that will never happen-and Santa Claus thanks us for that).
Our student body has a group that are loud and devoted. However, that group is not terribly large and the students are unfortunately more fair weather than most of the rest of the fan base. If we are going really well they will come out in big numbers, but if things get rough we lose a lot of the students (not all).