Dayton will not be in that pecking order for FOX$$$ and the west coast schools already have their conference set but I'm betting they will not hesitate to enter into an agreement with the C12 schools for marketing opportunities. It is not worth the time and resources for St. Mary's or Gonzaga to be part of the C12. Imagine shipping their baseball team out to GT for games? Also I'd put BU ahead of George Mason. GT would never ever allow them into their conference and I can't see WSU a public school enter the fray the same is true about VCU. There's certain things that a private institution can keep to themselves that a state funded institution can't.
Once you get past Tier Go West :lol: it becomes very dicey very quick for all the candidates. I still think Mason fits as a name brand, and balance the east/west thing if the C7 ever thinks about C16 or so, so I leave them up.
Obviously for the WCC candidates, that's a complete wildcard and can be placed anywhere in that tier list.
thefish7 said:
No way BU comes behind St Bonnie or Drake. Or Duquesne or Detroit.
Detroit > Western New York > Pittsburgh > Des Moines > Peoria
Sorry, but it's true.
When you get down that low, basketball product importance decreases. Big fan base decreases. Television markets increase. Bradley has a better overall basketball product than all those schools (you could argue St Bonaventure is on the uptick) but it doesn't matter as much.
You need one of 3 things in realignment:
1) Big market - Richmond, Butler, St Louis, Xavier, and barely Dayton have this. Duquesne does. St Bonaventure is western NY isn't great but it's something. Detroit's nice.
2) Dominance (or prolonged overall success) in your current conference - For the last 5 years or so, GMU, VCU and ODU have owned the CAA. Gone gone gone. Belmont owned the A-Sun. Gone. Butler owned the Horizon. Gone.Creighton and WSU haven't owned the MVC, but they've been the two most consistent at the top over the long haul
3) Tournament results - VCU, Butler and Mason have these in spades
Bradley in those categories:
1) Peoria is not big enough, and even worse, is surrounded by St Louis and Chicago to the south, which means we represent a rather finite area that doesn't expand any footprint the way Des Moines might
2) Last 2 years aside, when the absolute peak is 4th, that's not enough. Even Drake with its one magical year would be preferred because the peak and then nothing provides more overall value than a string of mediocrity
3) 2006 is starting to get old in age so the value there is diminishing. But we do trump a few teams in that regard.
In short, we're decent in all 3 categories but decent gets you nowhere.