• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Creighton and the new Catholic 7 league

so if the size of the market were the main factor then obviously we'd be hearing the names Manhattan, Holy Cross, & Iona a whole lot more - but obviously we are NOT.

Market is a main factor still. Xavier adds Cincinnati and Butler adds Indianapolis. Two new states, too. They just happen to have a marquee basketball program attached to it. And some of the NYC and Philly teams are duplicates of 'Nova and St John's, of course.

You're underestimating TV. FOX is paying couple hundred million over a lot of years to broadcast this conference. The conference is going to only add teams that either increase revenue or keep it steady. Market is a big part of that television factor. The landscape of college sports has changed a lot in the last 10 years with respect to media coverage. There's so much more money available compared to 10 years ago.

One thing you're right on is attendance, 6.5k is not 10k. 10k helps more. But even at 6.5k, we still dwarf most other candidates on the board. There's not many candidates between 6.5k and 10k, so I don't think declining attendance is as big a factor as you think.

So - give Butler credit - they positioned themselves WELL at this current time - but question how and why we are where we are.....
...positioned way worse in the past 7 years than we were at any times since Stan Albeck. Gotta ask - who is captain of the ship?
Past 7 years....now why choose that time frame? I don't see much difference in status over the last 25 years or so.

Bradley definitely has the academic standing to make it in a league like the Big East. So the issue is athletic. And if basketball is king, then the blame lays at the basketball program.

So if we're blaming anyone recent, it's Jim Les for not doing a good enough job. But to be clear, about 90% of all coaches would've "failed" in this context of not doing a good enough job to get Big East interest.



And for the record, I think the Big East made a mistake on Butler. They bought into a program at its absolute peak, which has been down in down times. I am willing to bet they already regret it.
 
..
Past 7 years....now why choose that time frame? ...

as I said that is the interval where Butler has put "light years" between themselves and us...they have succeeded in doing over the past 6-7 years what every school - certainly every mid-major - dreams of doing..and they have done it with virtually ZERO advantage and zero benefits that WE DON'T HAVE!! Plus they've done it on a smaller budget!
Don't tell you haven't got the tiniest bit of jealousy that they've been able to do it - but...
.. not only have we not - we've actually fallen way further from being able to do it over that interval - by a margin equal to how much they've improved!

They have improved their "marketability" to a BIG conference tremendously in that span, and we have dropped just as significantly..
I am not ashamed that I would like to do JUST AS WELL & improve ourselevs...
- why are so many "fans" happy to be worse in the past 6-7 years rather than LOTS better?
As I said - 7 years ago - we both had serious winning traditions, 20-win seasons, NCAA appearances & wins, we even had a Sweet 16 to go with theirs in 2003 (but then they missed the NCAA in 2004, '05, '06), and we had a better track record on attendance.


...one last thing ...from the mid-2000's thru around 2010 we saw multiple reports & stories on Bradley's successful fund raising and record donations!! Now we've lost a lot of that momentum...those giving want to see some winning to go with their support. Now we are having trouble giving away free breakfasts with the coach - you wanna wait 'til our fan support all but dies out before we discuss the seriousness of those losses?
Hey - even if I am the only one there I will still be supporting my team - but I am stunned to see support melting away so fast, while some fans are apparently happy to see it heading in that direction. Laughing while being hit with fallout & cheering the very moves that have seriously hurt our fan support.
 
as I said that is the interval where Butler has put "light years" between themselves and us...they have succeeded in doing over the past 6-7 years what every school - certainly every mid-major - dreams of doing..and they have done it with virtually ZERO advantage and zero benefits that WE DON'T HAVE!! Plus they've done it on a smaller budget!
Don't tell you haven't got the tiniest bit of jealousy that they've been able to do it - but...
.. not only have we not - we've actually fallen way further from being able to do it over that interval - by a margin equal to how much they've improved!

They have improved their "marketability" to a BIG conference tremendously in that span, and we have dropped just as significantly..
I am not ashamed that I would like to do JUST AS WELL & improve ourselevs...
- why are so many "fans" happy to be worse in the past 6-7 years rather than LOTS better?
As I said - 7 years ago - we both had serious winning traditions, 20-win seasons, NCAA appearances & wins, we even had a Sweet 16 to go with theirs in 2003 (but then they missed the NCAA in 2004, '05, '06), and we had a better track record on attendance.

Oh don't get me wrong, I'm jealous they're translated this into the Big East. And you're right, they did it with less resources than we have, even.

What did they do different? They fell into the next great coach, and they had 6 great weeks. 3 tournament weeks, across 2 tournaments. That's all. They binked 2 final fours. Now, they converted it into solid gold, but still. That's the only difference between them and us. They won big in March. Why did Bradley fall back? Because they didn't make final fours. It's tough to blame anyone for that.

So 7 years ago, we were basically the same, Bradley and Butler. 2 final fours changed everything. I don't think we can criticize Bradley for failing to do what Butler did.

And all this ties in to why I think the BEast made a mistake, investing in Butler's peak without realizing their non-peak value isn't good. We can provide a much better non-peak value than Butler....but since Butler has peaked and actually provided value from that, they are in a much better position.
 
so now we're happy with 4th?? ... I am hopeful of way better....

Just an outsider here, but it sure seems your tune has changed. You seemed pretty happy / content under Coach Les for 9 years. He never finished over 4th, right? And after 9 seasons of never finishing over 4th, weren't you against his being replaced?
 
my tune has never changed - I want to win and always want to do better -- but you act like we're already there -- LOL
but I was one of the few who foresaw the tremendous fallout in the face of many predictions that we would be instantly much better.
Remember all those nice sayings like don't throw the baby out with the bath water, and be careful what you wish for...
Like I say - I have not changed - I am just pointing out who it is that has changed - it is the fans who wanted JL fired so badly that they were willing to tank 3-4 years of our program to get it done - people who cheered for us to lose in St. Louis so JL wouldn't get retained, people who hated being 4th but now HAVE CHANGED & anxiously look forward to maybe finishing 4th this year in a weak year!
Some mask their excitement of mediocrity by being excited about "6th most improved" or "more athletic"..

if you think my tune has changed - show me where it was any different - I think it has always been remarkably the same
 
Last edited:
I am for improvement each year. Then a consistent positive trend of winning each year. I dont expect homeruns all the time. Just significant improvement
 
given that no midmajor outside of perhaps Butler - and that's gonna end soon - ever gets a home run every year...
perhaps we should start with the concept that getting a home run once in a while is the best we're likely to ever do...

I actually like the analogy and want to carry it further....

Butler hit home runs. HRs may be unrealistic to consistently hit, but we should hit the occasional one, with some doubles. In the last decade or so, we've had a triple (S16 year), a couple of singles, and a bunch of outs. We need to hit more doubles, and turn more outs into singles.

I saw that major changes were going to put us in the bottom of the Valley and not necessarily get us to the top any quicker or more likely anyway --
We were already in the bottom of the Valley. And yes, making a change might result in not getting to the top anytime quick. But if your current option can't get you there, you have to try and find an option that does. Whether or not that new coach succeeds or fails doesn't prove right or wrong the decision to get rid of the current option.


Like I say - I have not changed - I am just pointing out who it is that has changed - it is the fans who wanted JL fired so badly that they were willing to tank 3-4 years of our program to get it done - people who cheered for us to lose in St. Louis so JL wouldn't get retained, people who hated being 4th but now HAVE CHANGED & anxiously look forward to maybe finishing 4th this year in a weak year!

We weren't willing to take 3-4 years, Les was tanking it himself! We didn't get rid of JL for being tired of finishing 4th, we got rid of him to eventually get better than 4th place! No one is cheering for finishing 4th this year, we're cheering because we think we're finishing 4th this year on the way to a 1st or 2nd in the next year or two!




And now I'll stop because a realignment thread has morphed into a Les thread.
 
BF24, I hope you are right. I would look forward to an excuse to attend the tournament in St. Louis. The 2000 mile trip is hard to justify at this time.
 
Back
Top