• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Valley Home Attendance

Based on the number of season ticket holders and size of the announced attendance, I know that ISU does not count tickets sold- but actual tickets taken. This one reason why students now have to have a hard copy ticket to get into all games- no more flashing a RedAlert pass and student ID like it was 4 years ago...
 
Based on the number of season ticket holders and size of the announced attendance, I know that ISU does not count tickets sold- but actual tickets taken. This one reason why students now have to have a hard copy ticket to get into all games- no more flashing a RedAlert pass and student ID like it was 4 years ago...

Nacho is right. Red Alert had over 5000 members in last year. If they counted them for tickets purchased (which each and everyone has purchased a ticket) how does one explain games where we have had less than 5K as our listed attendance? Butts in seats.
 
I do not believe this is true. I have been told it is the official policy of the MVC to report attendance on ticket sales.
I have been to ISU games where the actual number of fans at the game was thousands less than the reported attendance.

Agreed, a quick eye-test can bust this myth. The may do something like is being said for students at such. But I still maintain there is now way they count butts in seats.
 
If it's true about ISU, then I would be shocked.

I spent several years in the major event promotion business, and promoters everywhere, from major league teams down to low-level act concerts always inflate their numbers to the public for non-sellouts. Always. i've never met a promoter who doesn't.

There's no shame in it. I don't see why it's a big deal. Getting "offended" because you believe that a crowd estimate is off seems a bit silly and over sensitive to me.

Frankly, comparing our attendance to other teams seems futile, but that's just my opinion. I want our program to sell out every game. It's not realistic until we improve the quality of the product. I firmly believe that if we consistently finished in the top-3 of the Valley and found ourselves in the big Dance or at least on the bubble every year, we would "legitimately" average near-sellout crowds.
 
Nacho is right. Red Alert had over 5000 members in last year. If they counted them for tickets purchased (which each and everyone has purchased a ticket) how does one explain games where we have had less than 5K as our listed attendance? Butts in seats.

I am pretty positive it is at SIU too. The numbers were always much higher when they used the old fashioned, serrated edged tickets. Now that they switched to the barcodes I am 90% sure it is butts in seats. But that could be because of our 2 off years also- although the eye test would suggest it has made an impact. Who knows?
 
Does it matter whether there are 5 or 7 or 9 anyways?


The majority fall asleep in their seats during games and leave before the games are over...


Sadly, I jumped up when Sammy hit the 3 with a minute left and there was a couple in front of me that I believe were BOTH basically asleep and that pretty much woke them up and proceeded to give them heart attacks (theoretically speaking).


I'm almost starting to believe that pumping in fake crowd noise might be better sometimes...

If they pipe in crowd noise make it loud enough to wake the band up also. Kind of hard for anyone to stay awake while all the PA announcements are going on during the timeouts. Turn the band and cheerleaders loose like most other arenas.
 
ISU reports attendance based on actual butts in the seats, unless it is a sell out, since it doesn't make any sense to say its a sell out, but there were less then 10,200 people there...

If this is the case, then why does it make sense in all instances other than sellouts? THAT doesn't make sense to me.
 
If this is the case, then why does it make sense in all instances other than sellouts? THAT doesn't make sense to me.

Because if you turn people away who are trying to get tickets (because they are sold out) but only report a crowd of 10,000 (200 less than capacity), there will be people upset that it wasn't a "sellout" and should have been allowed in. There will NEVER be a game where every sold ticket will be in attendance... Make better sense for ya now??? :roll:
 
Because if you turn people away who are trying to get tickets (because they are sold out) but only report a crowd of 10,000 (200 less than capacity), there will be people upset that it wasn't a "sellout" and should have been allowed in. There will NEVER be a game where every sold ticket will be in attendance... Make better sense for ya now??? :roll:

Yes, but there's still a difference between "sold out" and "full capacity".

The official attendance at last Sunday's Bradley game was 9,000. That means there were approx. only 2,000 tickets available, and not the 6,000+ that some are claiming. :roll:
 
Wow.

That's all I can say for how this discussion over attendance has so many people worked up.... basically from "Tornado-Hate". :lol:
 
If they pipe in crowd noise make it loud enough to wake the band up also. Kind of hard for anyone to stay awake while all the PA announcements are going on during the timeouts. Turn the band and cheerleaders loose like most other arenas.

I agree with that statement 100%.


The PA announcer is so worried about getting the announcements during the timeouts correct that he doesn't pay attention to parts of the game AND he can't even do his homework right and get players names correctly.


Its pronounced KUH-KNEE-ZU-VICH

and its MEE-LOSH


Its not that difficult to get the more important things right...


The Qdoba race and all that other garbage can kiss my you know what!
 
And what is more important, the number of fans who are in the arena or the number who pay to buy seats? Ask anyone associated with Bradley or with any college basketball team....it's the number of tickets sold and the revenue generated that is important. Bradley has reached record high revenues these past few years. That is not deniable. Nobody cares about no-shows, unless it eventually leads to less tickets sold, which it hasn't.

So as long as we sell-out the arena its OK if no one shows up. YIKES.
 
My point on all this attendance stuff is NOT so much who, what, how, how many, where, when is being reported its just that the atmosphere, in general, at BU is bad and getting worse IMO.

Then when you try and blow smoke up my arse and tell me that after 2 games we are averaging 9k...PUKE.

I'm not a numbers guy..I am more about results. So I'm glad BU is happy with a morgue as long as its a profitable one.
 
It's kinda hard to force 4,000+ "fans" to show up if they'd rather stay home to watch the Bears!


I agree...I'd say it was 1/2 to watch football and the other half due to good weather (the week before).

Bottom line....SUNDAY games should be outlawed. Can't sell a car...can't go to a game. :)
 
As I said, all schools, as far as I know, report attendance as tickets sold, not just Bradley. So I don't quite understand the issue here. Do you want Bradley to do a body count each game, and report the actual number of people in the stands each game, despite the fact that no other school does that?

I don't like Sunday games either. But I'll go when they play them.

Early season games have always had a lot more no-shows than games later in the season, especially compared with conference games. I don't think that has ever been any different, so why are we talking about it again?

And what is more important, the number of fans who are in the arena or the number who pay to buy seats? Ask anyone associated with Bradley or with any college basketball team....it's the number of tickets sold and the revenue generated that is important. Bradley has reached record high revenues these past few years. That is not deniable. Nobody cares about no-shows, unless it eventually leads to less tickets sold, which it hasn't.

There is not any need for a physical body count. When you enter Carver Arena, the bar code on yout ticket is scanned and yours and all ticked customers are registered as in attendance.
Therefore they CAN provide a pretty accurate correct attendance.
They count tickets sold, which include non attending season ticket holders purely because, it looks better and for the reasons stated above..
 
My point on all this attendance stuff is NOT so much who, what, how, how many, where, when is being reported its just that the atmosphere, in general, at BU is bad and getting worse IMO.

Then when you try and blow smoke up my arse and tell me that after 2 games we are averaging 9k...PUKE.

I'm not a numbers guy..I am more about results. So I'm glad BU is happy with a morgue as long as its a profitable one.

Maybe they should've went with a 5,000-seat on-campus arena. That way it would (hopefully) be full all the time and there would (hopefully) be a better student turnout as well.
 
That massage cam is the worst thing I have ever seen.


OMG...I about lost it when I saw that. You gotta be kidding me. But, I must admit...the excitment level went through the roof following that brainstorm of an idea. YIKES....

Band...who needs a band.
 
Maybe they should've went with a 5,000-seat on-campus arena. That way it would (hopefully) be full all the time and there would (hopefully) be a better student turnout as well.

Just for the record I was NOT saying YOU are blowing any smoke...:)...its the Universities.

Yes on the on-campus...no on the size.
 
Back
Top