For the record- the team is better- than last year. Everyone can see that. The only person who voted otherwise admits he made a mistake. Lake Camelot said it best in the 2nd post.
My point is that many of those who believed winning records, 21 and 22 win seasons, tougher schedules, good academics, clean program, etc. were not good, now seem satisfied with 9th seed and a .500 record against the worst schedule in modern history.
Would Bradley have been better last year with Remy? Yes.
Would they have been better this year? Probably, but Pickett helped a lot.
Did Geno Ford inherit one of the worst rosters in Bradley history, yes.
Is 7-11 in the MVC and being a team that is between 150 - 200 in college basketball an acceptable season for Bradley in the grand scheme of things? No.
Is it acceptable for a second year given what was inherited and improvement of a couple players? Yes.
Will the same people who were not satisfied with Les be satisfied with Geno if these are the results we have in 2 years? No.
Did some fans leave because of the coaching change? Yes.
Would some fans have left anyway? Probably
Are there some fans happy about the direction who may have left if there hadn't been a change? Probably.
Is there benefit to the University or Program by being negative about the improvement because of what might have happened in a mythical parallel universe? No.
Will there be plenty of time in two years to tell people "I told you so" when there are enough facts about the new staff if it doesn't continue to improve? Yes.
But, hey, I'm a newbie here, so feel free to discuss as you wish.