tornado
New member
if we just look at a player and form a subjective opinion as you seem to want...then it's like deciding what movie is best when I like one but you like another...it is purely subjective and then there's no reason to even have a debate because we're each entitled to our opinions of which one is best..
BUT - I am offering precise, well researched and easily provable OBJECTIVE info on the guy and now,
you say let's just cast all that out and use our biases??
unless you mean something else by "BODY OF WORK", then I will cite this...
Soph -- 15.83 ppg, 5.69 rpg, 43.2% shooting, 39% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against a weak set of opponents
Junior - 14.00 ppg, 6.18 rpg, 40.4% shooting, 35% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against a weak set of opponents
Senior - 15.55 ppg, 4.03 rpg, 40.0% shooting, 35% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against an even weaker set of opponents
...then also, assists, steals, and blocks are also all consistent within a couple tenths of a digit so they didn't vary much in any of those seasons either..and there just isn't a single statistical thing that more than a thread better as a senior that it was as a sophomore...plus I have been told many times even by ISU fans that they were disappointed by OE's lack of development and improvement as his career went on...
In fact you could almost make the opposite argument easier, that his shooting, rebounding, and other production actually went DOWN as a senior....maybe he got worse??
So -- if you say he got better from his sophomore season to his senior season...then give me just ONE piece of evidence, other than just a warm & fuzzy feeling way down inside that you feel it is true??
Just one...what did he do better as a senior than he did as a sophomore or junior?
BUT - I am offering precise, well researched and easily provable OBJECTIVE info on the guy and now,
you say let's just cast all that out and use our biases??
unless you mean something else by "BODY OF WORK", then I will cite this...
Soph -- 15.83 ppg, 5.69 rpg, 43.2% shooting, 39% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against a weak set of opponents
Junior - 14.00 ppg, 6.18 rpg, 40.4% shooting, 35% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against a weak set of opponents
Senior - 15.55 ppg, 4.03 rpg, 40.0% shooting, 35% from 3pt. - led his team to NIT against an even weaker set of opponents
...then also, assists, steals, and blocks are also all consistent within a couple tenths of a digit so they didn't vary much in any of those seasons either..and there just isn't a single statistical thing that more than a thread better as a senior that it was as a sophomore...plus I have been told many times even by ISU fans that they were disappointed by OE's lack of development and improvement as his career went on...
In fact you could almost make the opposite argument easier, that his shooting, rebounding, and other production actually went DOWN as a senior....maybe he got worse??
So -- if you say he got better from his sophomore season to his senior season...then give me just ONE piece of evidence, other than just a warm & fuzzy feeling way down inside that you feel it is true??
Just one...what did he do better as a senior than he did as a sophomore or junior?