• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

2/27 - Will Franklin's side of the story.. Interesting.....

like Mr. Luciano, you should spend more time reading the message boards, they are the new Woodward and Bernstein, the torch bearers of the truth...
 
The internet worked to debunk the phony scheme by Dan Rather to push those phony Reserve unit papers off on the public.

And there have been numerous cases wher amateur internet users solved problems that stumped experts.
 
Da Coach said:
The internet worked to debunk the phony scheme by Dan Rather to push those phony Reserve unit papers off on the public.

And there have been numerous cases wher amateur internet users solved problems that stumped experts.
Click to expand...

In this case, such a comparison is not applicable.
 
Woodward & Bernstein- investigative journalists

The internet wonk in Georgia who studied the bad photocopies that Dan Rather and his so-called experts claimed were legitimate, and discovered that they could not have been typed on any typewriter of that era, and in fact were generated by a decades-later word-processor, is just as much of an investigative hero.

He showed Dan Rather how it should have been done.
 
Da Coach said:
Woodward & Bernstein- investigative journalists

The internet wonk in Georgia who studied the bad photocopies that Dan Rather and his so-called experts claimed were legitimate, and discovered that they could not have been typed on any typewriter of that era, and in fact were generated by a decades-later word-processor, is just as much of an investigative hero.

He showed Dan Rather how it should have been done.
Click to expand...

By "this case" I was referring to the Ruffin incident, not the one with Dan Rather. My apologies for the confusion.

There was no information that was posted here and remained on here that provided any additional information for this case. Everything that was posted here and stayed up came from other sources of information, not people on this board doing the investigating themselves.
 
Scouter Sim Sim simmer down you can't take this all that serious on the "Woodward and Bernstein, the torch bearers of the truth..." comments. There is a thing as sarcasm.

As said by no other than Mark Twain
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." :cool:

Free RUFF!!!!
 
SanFranciscoPete said:
Scouter Sim Sim simmer down you can't take this all that serious on the "Woodward and Bernstein, the torch bearers of the truth..." comments. There is a thing as sarcasm.
Click to expand...

I'd love to agree with you on this, Pete (as we've done a lot lately!), but the sad thing is that tornado is serious with that comment.
 
Hey....it really doesn't matter, but I think the work done by a few people on local message boards has been what got the issues of Bobby Hill's ineligibility, the ISU DUI's, and the alternate explanations of the DRuff case to finally get noticed by the orthodox press.
I am convinced had the message boards not made these things hot topics, the standard press would have never gotten on the ball.
You are free to differ, but my mind is convinced.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top