• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

Bu 75 wsu 73!

Sorry Bradleyguy10.... you are wrong. Bradley is the ONLY team that has blown (4) double digit leads at home that YOU KNOW OF.

That is the Kirk Wessler approach to reporting and writing editorial pieces.

Yes - it's true Bradley has blown double digit 2nd half leads at home.

But they are NOT the ONLY team.

Just a little researching .... and I only looked at 3 teams. Check out Boston College.

Yeah when I posted that I knew there would be others that have done the same, but the intent was to keep it as close as possible to your original post haha.

I know we aren't the only team but we are better than that. Why are we blowing 6 big leads at home & losing 4 of them is the real question....that's all. It's frustrating to see and it makes it hard to truly believe in any type of "hot streak" that we are on. It is a good point someone made earlier about how if the game would've been close all along and we won by 2 points we'd be ecstatic. But that is kind of the point, we need consistency on this team. At least the latter is consistent play throughout the game. Not one bit of me understands how a team with talented players can blow such leads at home so consistently (the bad type of consistency). Yeah we won and I'm definitely glad we won otherwise I'd just be completely done with this season but again it's hard to feel like this team is going in the right direction still when it's the same old story repeating every time.

And what does it matter if we don't watch enough basketball? What does it matter if it is or isn't only bradley basketball that blows home leads? The fact is bradley is blowing big home leads on a regular basis...I don't care about any other team...I care about Bradley. The other teams are on their own, I'm sure their fans are b-ing and moaning also if they expected to be good this season, and the thing is they probably aren't being repeatedly called "negative nellies". What's so negative about caring and being concerned?
 
I'm not trying to make people feel better. I'm just trying to educate people. People must not watch enough basketball. Or people are just niave to think ONLY Bradley has blown leads.

Why would we care about other teams? This is BRADLEY FANS. We care about Bradley and what our team does.
 
That is a very good question and one I have raised on this board before. I think that questioning the direction of the program is what a fan would do IF they were worried.

Vast majority of fans on this site sit in the middle of the two dominate factions on this site. Sort of like our political parties where the extremes dominate in the messaging.
 
A message from our administrator

A message from our administrator

Vast majority of fans on this site sit in the middle of the two dominate factions on this site. Sort of like our political parties where the extremes dominate in the messaging.

Thanks SFP.

But here is the major distinction, and one that is important, regardless what the posters think.
There already is another message board that welcomes and encourages over-the-top negativism and criticism. And guess what, after Wednesday night's game, when there were nearly 200 people on this board, I checked that site because someone suggested I do so (I rarely visit other sites since this one takes up a bit of my time :) ) and there was 1 person on that site, a visitor, and not a single logged-in user.
Even now, our site has over 80 users online now, while the other site HAS 1 USER ONLINE! And it is one of the negative posters who wore out his welcome here and has been banned!

So maybe this is news to some people, most fans just get tired of the same droning negativity, and do not want to see it.
But even if they did, and people are welcome to wallow in misery all they want, this site has a predetermined agenda. We have never been secret that this is a pro-Bradley fan site, and we do not want the gratuitous negativity. So regardless of what anyone else thinks is fair, or thinks they have a right to say here, we will make that determination.

I get messages all the time from both sides. They run 90%-10%, and I'll let you guess which way the support leans. One side says we need to allow and encourage more negative criticism, and that if we don't, or if we moderate too much, this site will lose all it's posters and become irrelevant and die.
Hmmm... let's see, look at the above traffic numbers and see which site looks moribund. This site has never been more popular. Our page-hits have broken new records every month this season, and this m onth will set another record.

OTOH, multitudes of people from the other side constantly messages me that they hate to see all the negativism, and they ask that we not allow so much of it, and all the attacks that go with it. They say it ruins some of the passion and enjoyment of being a fan.
Fans that follow Bradley, as with fans of any sport, do so out of enjoyment and endearment. I can accept that there may be a minority of fans to follow Bradley with a different purpose or agenda, and if that is what they want, I encourage them to go for it. I hold no animosity toward anyone for the way they wish to express their fanhood. They can post all the negativity they want, just realize we have defined limits for that here.

This site was created and is run by private individuals, and with their own private resources, and we are under no obligation to allow "freedom of speech" here. I simply can't understand why that is such a difficult concept for some to grasp. Actually, I am sure most do understand, but feel compelled to push the limits of rules here. I also believe the misery-loves-company theory is also at play here.
Kool-aid Bradley fans don't care how much others dislike things, and are happy to allow as much dissent as the others want to put themselves through. But for some reason, the negative fans can't stand it as long as there is even 1 fan who doesn't wallow in the same misery they choose to live with. I simply hope both sides can see this issue, and allow us to moderate and maintain this community of Bradley fans the way we see fit.

I would be happy to lend advice to anyone who cannot understand this concept, or cannot agree or abide by it, so you may start your own website. But be advised- that has been tried before by private individuals who were not happy with the moderating restrictions here, and it has failed abjectly. It has also been tried by powerful newspaper backers with virtually unlimited resources, and who advertise their site extensively, and print links to their site in the newspaper, and online in every Bradley article. But nobody seems to want to go there or care.

So it seems I need to reiterate this every few months or so- but this site will remain predominantly a positive pro-Bradley site, and the decisions of the site owners and moderators are final, and not non-debatable.
Constructive, intelligent, and polite criticism will be allowed, as always.
But, anyone who wants to beat the drum of negativity, to carry things too far, or attack and belittle the posters who don't agree will not be allowed to do so here, and will be encouraged to go elsewhere.
Those who don't like this policy can always take their message to the other boards, and attack away at Bradley, the players, the coaches ad nauseum. And I am sure they will keep attacking BradleyFans.com, and the owners of this site as if anyone here cares. Thank you.
 
Vast majority of fans on this site sit in the middle of the two dominate factions on this site. Sort of like our political parties where the extremes dominate in the messaging.


The great thing is both "sides" or "factions" want BU to be the best it can be. They just differ on the path we are on.
 
Thanks SFP.

But here is the major distinction, and one that is important, regardless what the posters think.
There already is another message board that welcomes and encourages over-the-top negativism and criticism. And guess what, after Wednesday night's game, when there were nearly 200 people on this board, I checked that site because someone suggested I do so (I rarely visit other sites since this one takes up a bit of my time :) ) and there was 1 person on that site, a visitor, and not a single logged-in user.
Even now, our site has over 80 users online now, while the other site HAS 1 USER ONLINE! And it is one of the negative posters who wore out his welcome here and has been banned!

So maybe this is news to some people, most fans just get tired of the same droning negativity, and do not want to see it.
But even if they did, and people are welcome to wallow in misery all they want, this site has a predetermined agenda. We have never been secret that this is a pro-Bradley fan site, and we do not want the gratuitous negativity. So regardless of what anyone else thinks is fair, or thinks they have a right to say here, we will make that determination.

I get messages all the time from both sides. They run 90%-10%, and I'll let you guess which way the support leans. One side says we need to allow and encourage more negative criticism, and that if we don't, or if we moderate too much, this site will lose all it's posters and become irrelevant and die.
Hmmm... let's see, look at the above traffic numbers and see which site looks moribund. This site has never been more popular. Our page-hits have broken new records every month this season, and this m onth will set another record.

OTOH, multitudes of people from the other side constantly messages me that they hate to see all the negativism, and they ask that we not allow so much of it, and all the attacks that go with it. They say it ruins some of the passion and enjoyment of being a fan.
Fans that follow Bradley, as with fans of any sport, do so out of enjoyment and endearment. I can accept that there may be a minority of fans to follow Bradley with a different purpose or agenda, and if that is what they want, I encourage them to go for it. I hold no animosity toward anyone for the way they wish to express their fanhood. They can post all the negativity they want, just realize we have defined limits for that here.

This site was created and is run by private individuals, and with their own private resources, and we are under no obligation to allow "freedom of speech" here. I simply can't understand why that is such a difficult concept for some to grasp. Actually, I am sure most do understand, but feel compelled to push the limits of rules here. I also believe the misery-loves-company theory is also at play here.
Kool-aid Bradley fans don't care how much others dislike things, and are happy to allow as much dissent as the others want to put themselves through. But for some reason, the negative fans can't stand it as long as there is even 1 fan who doesn't wallow in the same misery they choose to live with. I simply hope both sides can see this issue, and allow us to moderate and maintain this community of Bradley fans the way we see fit.

I would be happy to lend advice to anyone who cannot understand this concept, or cannot agree or abide by it, so you may start your own website. But be advised- that has been tried before by private individuals who were not happy with the moderating restrictions here, and it has failed abjectly. It has also been tried by powerful newspaper backers with virtually unlimited resources, and who advertise their site extensively, and print links to their site in the newspaper, and online in every Bradley article. But nobody seems to want to go there or care.

So it seems I need to reiterate this every few months or so- but this site will remain predominantly a positive pro-Bradley site, and the decisions of the site owners and moderators are final, and not non-debatable.
Constructive, intelligent, and polite criticism will be allowed, as always.
But, anyone who wants to beat the drum of negativity, to carry things too far, or attack and belittle the posters who don't agree will not be allowed to do so here, and will be encouraged to go elsewhere.
Those who don't like this policy can always take their message to the other boards, and attack away at Bradley, the players, the coaches ad nauseum. And I am sure they will keep attacking BradleyFans.com, and the owners of this site as if anyone here cares. Thank you.

With the lack of transparency on this board...I will take everything you say with a grain of salt....especially the 90-10 part and any other part claiming you have the vast majority of support. I don't disagree that a pro-bradley and overall positive board is the way to go. But I wholeheartedly disagree with deleting posts that do offer constructive criticism when criticism is due. I don't mind deleting direct bashes etc. but this board has gotten more delete happy than ever.

Yeah yeah I know..I don't like it go somewhere else :roll: But here's the thing, the always "positive" posters are the ones that attack other posters more than the "negative nellies". I'm just making that statement in response to your claim of "anyone who wants to...attack and belittle the posters who don't agree will not be allowed to do so here, and will be encouraged to go elsewhere." It's funny how that works. You get support and those people are allowed to say anything and everything directly to posters. But anytime a person comes out and expresses displeasure with the team in general (no poster, specific player, or coach attacks) they get attacked for being negative when they have not done anything against your rules. How is this concept...which keeps getting brought up...so hard to understand and how is it so hard to determine the difference between what you are saying and what it actually is?
 
With the lack of transparency on this board...I will take everything you say with a grain of salt....especially the 90-10 part and any other part claiming you have the vast majority of support. I don't disagree that a pro-bradley and overall positive board is the way to go. But I wholeheartedly disagree with deleting posts that do offer constructive criticism when criticism is due. I don't mind deleting direct bashes etc. but this board has gotten more delete happy than ever.

Yeah yeah I know..I don't like it go somewhere else :roll: But here's the thing, the always "positive" posters are the ones that attack other posters more than the "negative nellies". I'm just making that statement in response to your claim of "anyone who wants to...attack and belittle the posters who don't agree will not be allowed to do so here, and will be encouraged to go elsewhere." It's funny how that works. You get support and those people are allowed to say anything and everything directly to posters. But anytime a person comes out and expresses displeasure with the team in general (no poster, specific player, or coach attacks) they get attacked for being negative when they have not done anything against your rules. How is this concept...which keeps getting brought up...so hard to understand and how is it so hard to determine the difference between what you are saying and what it actually is?

Hmmmmmmm...........
 
With the lack of transparency on this board...I will take everything you say with a grain of salt....especially the 90-10 part and any other part claiming you have the vast majority of support. I don't disagree that a pro-bradley and overall positive board is the way to go. But I wholeheartedly disagree with deleting posts that do offer constructive criticism when criticism is due. I don't mind deleting direct bashes etc. but this board has gotten more delete happy than ever.

Yeah yeah I know..I don't like it go somewhere else :roll: But here's the thing, the always "positive" posters are the ones that attack other posters more than the "negative nellies". I'm just making that statement in response to your claim of "anyone who wants to...attack and belittle the posters who don't agree will not be allowed to do so here, and will be encouraged to go elsewhere." It's funny how that works. You get support and those people are allowed to say anything and everything directly to posters. But anytime a person comes out and expresses displeasure with the team in general (no poster, specific player, or coach attacks) they get attacked for being negative when they have not done anything against your rules. How is this concept...which keeps getting brought up...so hard to understand and how is it so hard to determine the difference between what you are saying and what it actually is?


You are welcome to this opinion, but this forum does not promise transparency nor is there any reason we need to. Why can't you just appreciate that there are fans of BU who arw willing to spend their own money to provide this site, free of charge for fans to express their views,and all we ask is a little civility and to comply with a few simple rules. In the end, the rules will be enforced. We won't be bullied and posters will just have to take our word on the issue of how much support we get on either side actuall, it is well ovr 90% in favor of keeping this site more positive.
 
You are welcome to this opinion, but this forum does not promise transparency nor is there any reason we need to. Why can't you just appreciate that there are fans of BU who arw willing to spend their own money to provide this site, free of charge for fans to express their views,and all we ask is a little civility and to comply with a few simple rules. In the end, the rules will be enforced. We won't be bullied and posters will just have to take our word on the issue of how much support we get on either side actuall, it is well ovr 90% in favor of keeping this site more positive.

I appreciate the site coach.

"The thermometer of success is merely the jealousy of the malcontents."

Salvador Dal?­
 
Thanks for all you guys do Da Coach.

I'm tired of seeing a handful of negative posters hijack every thread. I say it's time to dust off the banhammer!! :)
 
Thanks.

And I apologize for the recent bunch of typos and spelling mistakes.
I am checked into a hotel in Omaha, and my only connection to the board is through my cellphone. I haven't acquired the knack of texting on these miniscule keypads very well!
 
Thanks.

And I apologize for the recent bunch of typos and spelling mistakes.
I am checked into a hotel in Omaha, and my only connection to the board is through my cellphone. I haven't acquired the knack of texting on these miniscule keypads very well!

Hey DC. I have a technical question. I have a blackberry with service through Verizon and can get the BradleyFans website. However, it does not appear to be mobile-enabled so I cannot log on or make posts. Suggestions?
 
I am afraid I am not the right person to ask. I think you need to stop into one of those Verizon offices and show them. Maybe some service needs to be activated on your account. Mine didt work with my old phone, but I just got the Droid, and it works now.
 
Hey DC. I have a technical question. I have a blackberry with service through Verizon and can get the BradleyFans website. However, it does not appear to be mobile-enabled so I cannot log on or make posts. Suggestions?

I've got a Samsung Omnia through Verizon, and I can log-on bradleyfans.com and enter posts. The phone uses Opera as a browser. Maybe that's a difference?
 
...posters will just have to take our word on the issue of how much support we get on either side actuall, it is well ovr 90% in favor of keeping this site more positive.

and the support that comes from certain significant people on the hilltop is an enthusiastic 100%!!
I can say we are the favorite message board of the people who matter most to us!!
 
Back
Top