• Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions. If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.

CollegeHoops.net Top 144 countdown -- 2008-09

Oh boy... here we go again.

I'm gonna initially say only 1 MVC in their top 50 and the only one going to NCAA, 2nd MVC in 51-60 going to NIT, 3rd MVC in the 70-85 range possibly going to NIT... (Bradley could be the 3rd MVC team on their list).

;)
 
I'll bet they have us at #4 in the MVC, behind CU, DU, and SIU. They will peg us at 82 overall.

I personally think we will be #2 in the MVC and would put us at 55 or so overall. If AW can take another huge step forward and AT is a beast I could see us top 30 overall and winning the MVC.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they had Bradley even lower, since we lost our two top scorers.
They have already shown they like Drake and they'll probably also put SIU and ISU ahead of BU.
 
#51 - just a number I like. Would rather go with #34 but I guess we'll have to wait a few weeks into the season:) For those wondering (Butkus & Payton). How about the Sox, are they going to even this years series with the Cubs tonight? Yesterday was a great game, how much fun would it be if both of them were in the WS - would be the highest TV rated WS in history.

How do you figure this would be the highest rated WS ever? That doesn't even make sense. No more than just the Cubs being in the series. Them Playing the Yanks or BoSox would draw far more viewers.
 
I would love to see the RedLine series go down, and I would love for it to be the White Sox that put the exclamation point on 100 futile years. Funny thing is, the way the two teams have been playing at home, the All-Star game might be the most important single game this year! Gotta love Bud Selig and his ad wizards that came up with that idea..
 
I have a feeling we will be closer to 144 then to 100 in this pole. I am going with we will be listed 129. Losing our guards and some unknown we will not get any respect. CU, ISU SIU and DU will get the respect in our league, until we can prove it on the court.
 
I have a feeling we will be closer to 144 then to 100 in this pole. I am going with we will be listed 129. Losing our guards and some unknown we will not get any respect. CU, ISU SIU and DU will get the respect in our league, until we can prove it on the court.

I am afrraid that you have hit it on the head houston. Very few if any magazines will pick BU higher then 5th. The real question is that high enough. It seems that when we get picked to finish high we finish lower and when we are picked to finish lower we do very well like 2 years ago.
my pick 102-next March though we go dancing-I hope
 
I actually find Bradley somewhat hard to predict for next season. I like to look at a team's statistical profile and try to project how it might change based on the personnel changes. Here's all the numbers for Bradley:

http://kenpom.com/sr.php?team=Bradley&y=2008

First, a look at the offensive side. Bradley had a very good offense last season - they finished 45th in adjusted offensive efficiency. The strengths of the offense were 3-point shooting and ball movement. Bradley was 28th in the nation in terms of the proportion of their shots taken from downtown, and shot them at a 37.4% clip - good for 73rd in the nation. Bradley was pretty average in terms of turnovers, two-point shooting, and getting to the foul line, and was below average in terms of offensive rebounding.

I see a slight dropoff in 3-point shooting, simply because Ruffin and Crouch shot and made so many of them. I do expect improvement from Warren and Maniscalco, and the new guards sound like good shooters, but I still think that facet of the offense won't be quite as good.

I think offensive rebounding should improve quite a bit, just by playing the returning big guys more (Collins, Singh, and Austin). If the big guys can increase their minutes while getting their turnovers under control, the offensive rebounding improvement will help make up for some of the lost shooting. Also, the returning big guys all shoot 60%+ from the field, so the 2-point shooting figures to improve as well.

Overall, I expect a slight dropoff offensively for Bradley this year, simply because Ruffin and Crouch were both such good offensive players. Let's say the Bradley offense drops from 45th to 60th (just a guess, really, but seems reasonable to me).

Defensively, Bradley finished 143rd in the nation in adjusted efficiency - this is the side that needs real improvement. The only real strength was getting steals, in which Bradley finished 66th. Every other category was below-average, but the worst ones were 3-point FG defense, defensive rebounding, and shotblocking. I've got to think that the latter two can be shored up simply by giving more minutes to big men, especially David Collins. Anthony Thompson may prove to be a major shotblocking factor as well. I do think the Bradley defense will improve, but the real question is how much. I think a reasonable expectation would be for the defensive to be something like 90th in the nation, which is in line with past Jim Les teams (except for the excellent Sweet Sixteen team).

Combining these offensive (60th) and defensive (90th) efficiencies would give you a team somewhere in the 70-75th range. So, that would be my baseline expectation, which with normal luck would be an NIT team. I think Bradley definitely has upside beyond that, and could turn into MVC champs and an NCAA Tournament team if things break right.

I have a feeling that this countdown will put Bradley worse than that, simply because Ruffin and Crouch are high-profile losses. I think the returning players form a solid enough core that not much is even needed from the new players to have a top 100 team.
 
Back
Top