The BIG EAST is doing it again. I believe they have lost nearly half of their first round games. Same as last year...George Mason just beat Villanova. I totally agree with Charles Barclay...This conference is way OVERATED!!! Yet, almost everyone in my previous post, "do you agree with 11 big east teams being in the tourney", agreed that there should have been 11 teams in the tourney. How can this be when 2 years in a row an exhorbitant number of big east teams continue to get beat by lower seeds? They look competitive because they play each other where there is parity among the teams. Yet, put them up against lower seeds and what happens? Of course there are the Connecticuts of the world...a really good team. But yet the majority of the big east is very mediocre in my opinion. My point being that more mid-majors should be in the tournament and fewer big east teams. One other thing...have you noticed the abnormal number of "cupcake" teams the big east plays in the non-conference? Connecticut and Syracuse have been especially criticized for the number of weak teams that they play.