Buesch N Chips
New member
http://blogs.pjstar.com/pressrow/2010/10/16/first-impressions-of-first-practices/
Say what you want, but this is fantastic coverage....
Say what you want, but this is fantastic coverage....
Where are the detractors giving credit where credit is due? DR always does a great job, and I think KW does as well.
Regarding the players, the size increase from our front line was noticeable last night (I noted this in the 'news from the hoopla' thread). Let's hope their games have grown as much as their muscles have.
I hate to be Debbie Downer, but what among all this hasn't already been discussed on the board for the past few weeks?
Where are the detractors giving credit where credit is due? DR always does a great job, and I think KW does as well.
Regarding the players, the size increase from our front line was noticeable last night (I noted this in the 'news from the hoopla' thread). Let's hope their games have grown as much as their muscles have.
http://blogs.pjstar.com/pressrow/2010/10/16/first-impressions-of-first-practices/
Say what you want, but this is fantastic coverage....
I agree that there was nothing new in that article. Would be nice to hear something we haven't heard before.
If I summarize info from this board and put it in a letter to the editor will you guys give me a cookie for great BU coverage? Didn't think so.
But don't you get it...the article ISN'T for hardcore fans that might allreay know this stufff. Its for the 99% of BU fans that DON'T obsess with the stuff like WE do.
They are not going to write for the members of this board, they are going to write for the other 99% of Bradley fans.
But don't you get it...the article ISN'T for hardcore fans that might allreay know this stufff. Its for the 99% of BU fans that DON'T obsess with the stuff like WE do.
If this is the case, then perhaps the PJS is once again underestimating their audience!;-)
Wow. You've got a message board, blog, and twitter account constantly updated by you with BU info, and you are negative because the article has no new info for you? That's crazy.
They are not going to write for the members of this board, they are going to write for the other 99% of Bradley fans. I myself also like hearing it from a reporter at practice, not some goofy fan seeing a player walk into One World or whatever.
Why does everything have to have a negative spin? It's a fantastic article and BB starts bringing up "Detractors" and you try to slant it so it is not good coverage. How about enjoying the article instead of going back to our old sides of the same argument that will never be solved?
Wow. You've got a message board, blog, and twitter account constantly updated by you with BU info, and you are negative because the article has no new info for you? That's crazy.
They are not going to write for the members of this board, they are going to write for the other 99% of Bradley fans. I myself also like hearing it from a reporter at practice, not some goofy fan seeing a player walk into One World or whatever.
Why does everything have to have a negative spin? It's a fantastic article and BB starts bringing up "Detractors" and you try to slant it so it is not good coverage. How about enjoying the article instead of going back to our old sides of the same argument that will never be solved?
Besides.....ANYTHING I hear on some silly meeage board or goofy blog must be taken with a grain of salt becuase the standards of truth and accuracy don't compare to what comes from journalists.
I think DR does a good job covering the Braves. Maybe there's a reason, but how come this was a blog and not printed in the JS. Not all of the "99%" have blog capabilities. Remember now fans, if you report on seeing a BU player outside of practice, you are a "goofy fan".