Oscar Pistorius - the guy who ran the 200m on blades in the Olympics championed the idea that it was totally fair that he used those blades because he had no legs....
Well - after Pistorius lost the 200m to another guy wearing almost identical blades in the London Paralympics...he accused the other guy of...
cheating because he had an unfair advantage - the other guy had better blades!
"After losing..Pistorius told British broadcaster .."We are not running in a fair race here."
Pistorius insisted that there was an issue with large prosthetics lengthening his Brazilian competitor's stride.
...I do believe there is an issue here."
....Oliveira, 20, caught Pistorius in the final 20 meters of the final race last night,
marking the first time Pistorius didn't win a 200 meter run.
"He's never run a 21 second-race and I don't think he's a 21-second athlete,'' Pistorius had said.
"I don't know how you can come back, watching the replay, from eight meters behind on the 100 to win. It's absolutely ridiculous."
So....Pistorius is complaining because the other guy with NO LEGS used the blades to nab a clear advantage that helped him run faster?
I find these comments interesting and hypocritical because Pistorius is saying that the blades do
have the capability of giving the user a significant advantage and an advantage big enough to help a guy win.
next year some guy will show up wearing 6-ft blades! But I think this shows that anyone using any mechanical or unnatural equipment might be unfair because it could give an advantage.
If the guy can't even win his own race against people just like him using blades, then he has no right to complain if he & his blades get banned from a race where the other competitors aren't using blades.
Well - after Pistorius lost the 200m to another guy wearing almost identical blades in the London Paralympics...he accused the other guy of...
cheating because he had an unfair advantage - the other guy had better blades!
"After losing..Pistorius told British broadcaster .."We are not running in a fair race here."
Pistorius insisted that there was an issue with large prosthetics lengthening his Brazilian competitor's stride.
...I do believe there is an issue here."
....Oliveira, 20, caught Pistorius in the final 20 meters of the final race last night,
marking the first time Pistorius didn't win a 200 meter run.
"He's never run a 21 second-race and I don't think he's a 21-second athlete,'' Pistorius had said.
"I don't know how you can come back, watching the replay, from eight meters behind on the 100 to win. It's absolutely ridiculous."
So....Pistorius is complaining because the other guy with NO LEGS used the blades to nab a clear advantage that helped him run faster?
I find these comments interesting and hypocritical because Pistorius is saying that the blades do
have the capability of giving the user a significant advantage and an advantage big enough to help a guy win.
next year some guy will show up wearing 6-ft blades! But I think this shows that anyone using any mechanical or unnatural equipment might be unfair because it could give an advantage.
If the guy can't even win his own race against people just like him using blades, then he has no right to complain if he & his blades get banned from a race where the other competitors aren't using blades.
Comment