Originally posted by SFP
View Post
In my opinion, minimum government does not meaning giving our government complete cart blanche to legalize everything. Any free society has to have some limits, but putting limits on certain things does not mean we are heading towards a totalarian government either. Unfortunately, when our government does come up with some common sense limitations, there always seems to exist the same group of people who cry and moan that our liberties are at risk. When it comes to banning drugs, that couldn't be further from the truth. However, I do fear we are headed in that direction when it comes to "substances" that do not harm other people, as in the case of this outrageous soda ban in New York.
That aside though, regarding pot, I did not mean to imply SFP that everyone who smokes it is not intelligent enough to do their job. And I also did not mean that everyone who smokes pot is an immediate danger to others while driving. That said though, I really hope your friends who use this stuff are aware of the dangers of using this drug, even if there are no visible signs of trouble. And even if someone who smokes pot is bright enough and alert enough to overcome "side effects" of the drug, that does not mean the damage isn't being done.
I am a conservative, but there is definitely a lot that I like about the libertarian philosophy of less government that the Republican party seems to have long abandoned. That said though, what is it about most libertarians and their belief in drug legalization?! I never understood that, and I think that one issue in particular is what has kept many more people from subscribing to that party and their platform. I'm all for freedom from the governement, but not allowing people to do anything they want without regards to others. Legalizing drugs (be it pot or anything worse) sure would infringe on my rights to a safe environment if they were allowed to be legalized.
Comment