Originally posted by it's boogie time
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
BU 61 vs. UMKC 73
Collapse
X
-
Nope
Originally posted by shaunguth View PostSure.....but can we please stop "waiting" for AW to return?
Comment
-
Not good. Can't beat that zone using the bigs or the 3-pointers. An ugly mess, just about any way I can look at it. Thought WE looked okay in his minutes... That's about the only positive thing I can think of. I think we should adopt the UMKC superflop defense if the same refs have any of our other games in the tourney. The refs were bad, but Bradley was worse in this one. Missing DRuff and JC a lot right now.
Athletic talent is there, but we have not performed the required gelling action, or something like that. There were times vs. Florida where we looked very good, so I still have some hope, but I think it's going to be way up and down for a few games yet.
Comment
-
This team had a full week to prepare for this game...that may be the most concerning point here.
This coaching staff had to know that we were going to face a zone for the entire week down in Florida...yet we came out in the first half and looked completely baffled. Turning the ball over 16 times in the first half against a smaller, less athletic team playing exclusively zone against you is simply unacceptable...especially when the coaching staff had a full week to prepare the team to play against a zone...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bradleyguy10 View PostThat's a little harsh and uncalled for as of right now. We still are 3 games only into the season with our leaders either not playing or not playing well...
We probably won't be very good until the conference season or maybe the entire season...but the worst team ever?
Question for you. . .and be honest. . .how much of a difference do you see AW making in either of the two losses?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ifaraniaWhat trauma are you referring to?
And am I the only one who would like to see a more traditional lineup?
One week to prepare and this is what JL puts out on the court... UNACCEPTABLE.
Comment
-
Originally posted by squirrel View PostQuestion for you. . .and be honest. . .how much of a difference do you see AW making in either of the two losses????People say, ???Forget last year', but I want our guys to remember that one, because that will not happen again. We will be much better.??? Geno Ford, 9/22/12
Comment
-
Originally posted by ifaraniaWhat trauma are you referring to?
And am I the only one who would like to see a more traditional lineup?
Not to mention that I don't think it would fix anything anyway, but that's a whole other issue.
Comment
-
I disagree. I think AW would have made quite a difference on the offensive side of the ball in THIS game. With him and SM out there with the ability to make 3s, you could have moved the ball around enough to create a shot or get a double out on the perimeter so someone could drive open. I'm not sure if we could have won with the defensive woes we had, but it would have made our offense quite a lot better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by amettrick View PostIt's all good and well to call for a more traditional line-up, but we simply don't have the players to do it.
Not to mention that I don't think it would fix anything anyway, but that's a whole other issue.
And amettrick: I think we are better suited to a traditional lineup than a run/gun/jack errant threes lineup. Maybe throw AT or WE at the four, wilson at the three, warren at the two... just SEE what happens instead of bashing our heads against the wall with a system geared towards a team with sharshooters.
The difference between ignorance and stupidity is repetition.Here's the deal, Wyoming for football, Bradley for basketball.
Surviving Orwellian message boards since 1984
Comment
-
Just as a side question... What's up with TW's threes? He even taken one this year?
It's strange. You can tell no one's confident with the 3, as they're passing over quite a few open shots out there.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment