At UVA (Virginia)
Let's agree not to get into too much depth regarding 1st Amendment analysis, issues, etc.....I think we can all concede that point.
Profanity? Duh.
Derogatory? By whose determination? Not so sure that a simple statement like the one they reference, while technically is "derogatory," should be restricted.
Impede another's view? Kind of weak, but legit, to some degree.
Cover any stadium signage? Don't want to piss off those sponsors!!! This might be the most important reason!!!
Athletics department officials say the change is intended to support and promote sportsmanship in a positive game-day environment. It applies to football and basketball games, as well as all other athletics events.
The new policy comes roughly a year after student David Becker was threatened with ejection from Scott Stadium during a football game for a sign that read "Fire Groh." Becker's homemade sign reflected a view of head football coach Al Groh.
Becker was then informed that the sign violated a policy banning signs that contained derogatory comments or profanity, or impeded another guest's view of the field or cover any stadium signage.
The new policy comes roughly a year after student David Becker was threatened with ejection from Scott Stadium during a football game for a sign that read "Fire Groh." Becker's homemade sign reflected a view of head football coach Al Groh.
Becker was then informed that the sign violated a policy banning signs that contained derogatory comments or profanity, or impeded another guest's view of the field or cover any stadium signage.
Profanity? Duh.
Derogatory? By whose determination? Not so sure that a simple statement like the one they reference, while technically is "derogatory," should be restricted.
Impede another's view? Kind of weak, but legit, to some degree.
Cover any stadium signage? Don't want to piss off those sponsors!!! This might be the most important reason!!!
Comment