Originally posted by BradleyBrave
View Post
I dont think that the Bryant trade existed. From everything I've seen, the Bulls would have to give up too much of their roster to get KG or Gasol, which would turn the Bulls into the T-wolves or Griz (both worse franchises than the Bulls). Gasol is the #2 in LA, but he would be expected to be the #1 in Chicago-a position he clearly is not comfortable with. Please don't try to make the argument that KG would bring the Bulls to the finals (MAYBE if they could have gotten KG and Gasol). The Bulls still don't have a star so trading for those players wouldn't help.
4 other teams missed on Roy. The Bulls wanted Thomas and they forced portland to trade for him. It's far to early to call Thomas a bust and Aldridge a better player. I agree that Aldridge appears better at this point.
Do you have this "documented involvement" because I would love to see it.
Chicago is not a league-wide joke. I have no idea where you got that from. New York is a league-wide joke.
Collins didn't want to coach.
Chandler had to be traded. He was a bad fit with Wallace on the team, and he had no value on the Bulls. I think his success on the hornets has far more to do with him being a good fit on that team than him being a good player (like Wallace with Det). It's easy to rip a trade like that. Same thing happened with Tim Thomas when he left the Bulls and had "success" on PHX. You could argue that the Bulls should have gotten more for Chandler, but I don't think teams were lining up to take him.
From what I've read, many teams don't think Gordon would be good on other teams than he is on the Bulls. Deng could still be good-he needs to stay healthy.
Did someone on the Bulls beat you up when you were a kid or poop in your cereal? You really seem personally offended by the Bulls.
Comment