Originally posted by scout4126
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
OLD THREAD: Starting five...with updated comments
Collapse
X
-
If I remember correctly, I believe that Les said that Thompson may be playing more from the 4 spot next year, because he has such a great mid-range shot. I could be wrong though. He may see time at both the 4 & 5.Thinking is the hardest work, that is why so few people do it. -Henry Ford
Yeah...I've been in college for a while now and I'm pretty sure that awesomest is not a word. -Andrew E.
Comment
-
Personally I think these kind of threads are silly at this time of year but here I am anyway....I don't think there is any way somebody starts at point over SM barring injury,or some other freak thing....he played too much point,knows the system for JL to start somebody over him in their first year at BU.....AW and TW will start probably and the rest is up the air
Comment
-
Originally posted by lefty View PostPersonally I think these kind of threads are silly at this time of year but here I am anyway....I don't think there is any way somebody starts at point over SM barring injury,or some other freak thing....he played too much point,knows the system for JL to start somebody over him in their first year at BU.....AW and TW will start probably and the rest is up the air
So to say it again.... IMO - SM, AW, and TW are locked in to start. Those are the 1-2-3 spots or the 1-2-4 spots.
Gonna be a long offseason figuring out who gets the nod for the other 2 starting spots... but not that long, I guess. Since we played into April and things get started earlier now in October... heck, May has started so count that month off and October is when it starts so you can't count it either... that leaves only 4 months for the offseason... it's gonna go by like THAT *finger-snap*!
(weak attempt at Seinfeld humour)
Comment
-
Originally posted by MacabreMob View PostCompletely agree Lefty.
So to say it again.... IMO - SM, AW, and TW are locked in to start. Those are the 1-2-3 spots or the 1-2-4 spots.
Gonna be a long offseason figuring out who gets the nod for the other 2 starting spots... but not that long, I guess. Since we played into April and things get started earlier now in October... heck, May has started so count that month off and October is when it starts so you can't count it either... that leaves only 4 months for the offseason... it's gonna go by like THAT *finger-snap*!
(weak attempt at Seinfeld humour)
Comment
-
Why would DD start over SM, that makes no sense!
SM Freshman year at BRADLEY:
7.7 ppg, .417 from the field, 3.3 apg, 2.1 A/TO in 27.2 min/game
DD Freshman year at ISU:
5.2 ppg, .336 from the field, 1 apg, 1.1 A/TO, 22.6 min/game
And its known that Sam is a true leader and will be around another year the Dodie, and he's BEEN IN THE SYSTEM. Sam is also one of, if not the, strongest players on the team (at least bench-press wise). Guys, he's gonna start.
Comment
-
AW and TW are the only true locks book that! DD will be given the chance to start at the 1. He is bigger than SM and if I rember correctly quite fast. I would also be suprised if our team does not press a bit more this year with all the depth we have 1-3 positions. This will help us negate some of our defensive problem that we will have with our bigs unless RA steps it up. SS will be SS and he will give it his all, lead by example but he's not athletic enough to be a difference maker. DC and AT do not have the body to pound the boards night in and night out. WE could and I mean could suprise us all but he is probably a year from providing us that consistant player we need now."Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
??” Thomas Jefferson
sigpic
Comment
-
Lefy you are right, it is silly this early to try and figure out the starting five but what else do we have to do? If its silly but we are talking about Bradley basketball in May I can live with it.
Another silly question, can next years team be better than last years team? Do we move up the ranks in the MVC or fall back?
Comment
-
Originally posted by amckillip View PostWhy would DD start over SM, that makes no sense!
SM Freshman year at BRADLEY:
7.7 ppg, .417 from the field, 3.3 apg, 2.1 A/TO in 27.2 min/game
DD Freshman year at ISU:
5.2 ppg, .336 from the field, 1 apg, 1.1 A/TO, 22.6 min/game
And its known that Sam is a true leader and will be around another year the Dodie, and he's BEEN IN THE SYSTEM. Sam is also one of, if not the, strongest players on the team (at least bench-press wise). Guys, he's gonna start.
Comment
-
thinking
SM
AW
TW
AT
DC or SS
there are plenty of options....unlike last season though we know about some options....
we know DC now and WE and RA and expect improvement in them...if they improve like some of our other past big guys did, after a year under their belt....we will be able to play a bit different this next season......I mentioned it before as have others.....
UP TEMPO AND PRESSURE TO THE HILT....we have the bodies..it should be fun....Peoria Toyota Scion
Comment
-
Originally posted by mexicobufan View PostLefy you are right, it is silly this early to try and figure out the starting five but what else do we have to do? If its silly but we are talking about Bradley basketball in May I can live with it.
Another silly question, can next years team be better than last years team? Do we move up the ranks in the MVC or fall back?
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment