By the #'s

[BUconnorD]

Rusty 54 said this would be a good thread and I agreed...

from [B]jlp[B]
percentage of games won, last three years. i'm giving us the win friday for the 07-08 stats.

2005-06 - 66.7% - 33 games played
2006-07 - 62.9% - 35 games played
2007-08 - 57.9% - 38 games played (will be on fri)


what do we make of these #'s...

IMO...we've been losing, but our strength of schedule has gone up considerably (esp. this year). If someone has the strength of schedules from the last three years can they post too?

[tornado]

the same few people will tell it's bad....they see only the half empty glass

[MacabreMob]

Sos

2008: 75
2007: 21
2006: 50

Edit - I think our SOS was hurt by the MVC being down this year. RPI's in the MVC the last 3 years:

2008
Top 50 = 3
Top 100 = 4

2007
Top 50 = 4
Top 100 = 6

2006
Top 50 = 6
Top 100 = 6

[jasonpeoria911]

Numbers can only tell so much, you have to throw in injuries and suspensions as well. This team would be on the verge of 26-30 wins had they stayed healthy and behaved all season. Instead 1 starter was out about 15 games. With the lack of depth on this team, the 1 less starter really made an impact.

Jason

[tornado]

But Bradley still hasn't played as many games as they did in the 1950-1951 season...
so is that season also deserving of an asterisk??

[MacabreMob]

But Bradley still hasn't played as many games as they did in the 1950-1951 season...
so is that season also deserving of an asterisk??

Doesn't it already?

[TheAsianSensation]

It means we're decent, but that we need to start getting some non-conference scalps. Or any.