If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
Vegas is playing us like we are Houston. They lost to Tulsa by 4 73-69. I'd play the over tonight because I think we'll score in the 70s tonight and we have a way of making not so great Os look decent sometimes. I'm never to worry about us scoring the problem is can we shut them down and not get to far behind at some point during the game. I suspect Tulsa has a better D than UVA.
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
??” Thomas Jefferson
sigpic
???People say, ???Forget last year', but I want our guys to remember that one, because that will not happen again. We will be much better.??? Geno Ford, 9/22/12
If the line opened at Tulsa -4 and moved to Tulsa -5.5, how do you figure there was 90% action on Bradley? At 90% action the line would have swung dramatically, probably to a Bradley favor. The entire point of running a house is to level the bets and bank off the juice... otherwise the House is gambling.
The house doesn't want to gamble. That's why they love slots, ********************s plunking in money guaranteed to lose 20%. But hey, they're getting an 80% payout! If the game doesn't have a house edge, they won't play. The edge in sports is built in the juice, they try to make the wagering player v. player (horses are the best example of this as it is real time in most cases).
Action gets skewed, but not at the 90% range without the line being closed and adjusted.
Last edited by JesseTU; 03-31-2008, 11:52 PM.
Reason: I can't say i(d)i(o)ts? Pretty tame word.
If the line opened at Tulsa -4 and moved to Tulsa -5.5, how do you figure there was 90% action on Bradley? At 90% action the line would have swung dramatically, probably to a Bradley favor. The entire point of running a house is to level the bets and bank off the juice... otherwise the House is gambling.
The house doesn't want to gamble. That's why they love slots, ********************s plunking in money guaranteed to lose 20%. But hey, they're getting an 80% payout! If the game doesn't have a house edge, they won't play. The edge in sports is built in the juice, they try to make the wagering player v. player (horses are the best example of this as it is real time in most cases).
Action gets skewed, but not at the 90% range without the line being closed and adjusted.
Of course unless they know something that the rest of us don't.
"Educate and inform the whole mass of the people...they are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty."
??” Thomas Jefferson
sigpic
Looks to me like Vegas got killed on this one. Opens at Tulsa -4, then the sharps hammer the line and it moves up to -5.5. After that, every indication is that Bradley +5.5 was the square play. Sure enough Tulsa wins by 5 and everyone cashes including those who played the middle. Of course it doesn't matter in the end because I'm sure the action was 1/10th of a percent of a single game this past weekend.
The edge in sports is built in the juice, they try to make the wagering player v. player (horses are the best example of this as it is real time in most cases).
Action gets skewed, but not at the 90% range without the line being closed and adjusted.
Horse race wagering is called pari-mutuel wagering. The odds to be payed off are based on the amount of money on each horse in relation to all the money wagered. (of course, the house takes a small percentage)
Comment