Originally posted by mrcoachdude
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Time for a verbal?
Collapse
X
-
He is listed at 186lbs on the bubraves.com roster...the same as the whole 1ft shorter TCS!!!! How is that possible!!?!?!? Kinda funny to me.. anyways, I have heard that AT has gained upwards of 30lbs of muscle since arriving on campus over the summer. Did he play other sports in HS that prevented him from lifting outside of bball season?
Comment
-
Originally posted by beanocookschins View PostI still want a four-year player. Look long term here.I don't smoke weed...I smoke dudes like you on the bball court
Comment
-
Originally posted by beanocookschins View PostI still want a four-year player. Look long term here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da Coach View PostThat is and always has been the coach's preference, too. But it is not as simple as just choosing to go with a 4-year vs. a 2-year recruit. They looks at all aspects of the kid and how he will help Bradley. I believe their top priorities now are a couple prep kids, but if they don't pan out, I would rather see them go after someone who can play and contribute next year, even if it's a juco, rather than a high school kid that is a project.
I understand coaches look at all aspects of a kid and how he fits a program. If they weren't I would wonder what they are doing.
We do kinda disagree. I would take a HS project that could redshirt and grow over a JUCO guy. Especially late JUCO guys. They tend to be greatly overrecruited because so many teams have needs and are desperate. I don't want to fall into that trap. A prep school kid would be a nice option. I would even take a DI transfer (after their freshman season) and get three years of that over a JUCO guy.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BradleyBrave View PostOk...now I am starting to get worried. We need to fill this scholarship!
BB, Why do we need to fill this last scholarship? What is the rush or immediate need? We have 13 players, 12 scholarship players, depth in the guard and small forward position, some depth on the interior and decent experience coming back.
I am not sure that it is essential to go and get someone to fill this scholarship. I would not hate to see us hold the scholarship for next season when we lose SS, TW TCS Austin and Collins.
I dont see the immediate need this season, unless we can use the scholarship for a 4 year player who is either to good to pass up or one who is coming with the understanding he redshirts.
Comment
-
Originally posted by houstontxbrave View PostBB, Why do we need to fill this last scholarship? What is the rush or immediate need? We have 13 players, 12 scholarship players, depth in the guard and small forward position, some depth on the interior and decent experience coming back.
I am not sure that it is essential to go and get someone to fill this scholarship. I would not hate to see us hold the scholarship for next season when we lose SS, TW TCS Austin and Collins.
I dont see the immediate need this season, unless we can use the scholarship for a 4 year player who is either to good to pass up or one who is coming with the understanding he redshirts.
I agree completely. PT is always an issue and more so with a scholi being used just to award them all. Have enough players to fill the required roles on the team and have enough practice players. You can always award a one year scholi to a walk-on. Team harmony is important.Last edited by mike radigan; 04-10-2008, 02:21 PM.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment