Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Illinois vs. Minnesota

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    quote=MacabreMob
    My eyes are already bleeding from the terrible offensive game expected between Wisky and the Illini.

    I say the first one to 46 wins.

    Prediction:

    Illini 46
    Wisky 42

    more

    /\/\/\/\..monkeys../\/\/\/\

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Beninator View Post
      You are right Mob, I missed your predictions from last night. --didnt mean to steal your thunder. -- I am not sure about number 5 though. I cringe just about every time the Illini shoot freethrows and that could be the difference against a team like Drake.

      fwiw, I would love to see the Illini bounce ISU to the NIT.
      Surprisingly, the Illini's FT shooting has been much better in the BTT, and has been part of the reason they've been able to win the last 3 days. I'm just praying that they don't come out tomorrow exhausted from having to play 4 games in 4 days.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by IlliBraves View Post
        If anything that Farber or whatever his name is should have been called for a foul on Brock. He nailed him right in the face.

        Tomorrow will be a tall order, but it's not unattainable. Go Illini!

        Well I agree with that but once no foul called then it should have been a travel. You have to call one of the two...thee are not offsetting penalties

        Comment


        • #19
          I don't think so, lefty...but I can see that it looks like traveling.
          But...
          if the guy comes down and establishes possession while upright, then falls to the floor it is traveling.
          But if he is going for a rebound or loose ball and ends up on the floor, especially if he gets knocked to the floor through no fault of his own, then I have seen this allowed, and NOT called traveling 90% of the time, and it is the right call.
          It is the same as if he dives onto the floor to fight for and grab a loose ball. It is not traveling

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by tornado View Post
            I don't think so, lefty...but I can see that it looks like traveling.
            But...
            if the guy comes down and establishes possession while upright, then falls to the floor it is traveling.
            But if he is going for a rebound or loose ball and ends up on the floor, especially if he gets knocked to the floor through no fault of his own, then I have seen this allowed, and NOT called traveling 90% of the time, and it is the right call.
            It is the same as if he dives onto the floor to fight for and grab a loose ball. It is not traveling
            The way I remember the play Brock came down with both feet and then fell to the ground losing his pivot foot. The contact happened long before he hit the floor and a foul could have been called but wasn't so it seems like it should have been a travel...but I'm no ref..

            Comment

            Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

            Collapse
            Working...
            X