Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

The 12 games 'til Christmas...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 12 games 'til Christmas...

    We've had 12 games, and here we are at Christmas. I have probably thought longer and harder and deeper after last night's debacle than I have all season. I thought about last night's game, but also about the season as a whole up to this point. So, in honor of our 12 non-conference games and in the spirit of the 12 days of Christmas, I have 12 points on what's going on right now with our beloved Braves. Some are observations, some are questions, some are predictions. We have a week to discuss, analyze, digest, and recover until the league season starts, so I thought I would get it started. Feel free to agree, disagree, or tell me I am crazy...

    1. At this point, I can't agree with the statement that this is the most talented group Jim has had. I just can't agree with the argument that this group is more talented than the Sweet 16 group, which had nearly the entire starting lineup from last year's 22 win team coming off the bench. Our supposed 'depth' is nowhere remotely close to that group at this point.

    2. This team is kind of reminding me of the '05-'06 team, in the regard that they're underachieving, not guarding people, and the coach doesn't seem to know who to play and when to play 'em.

    3. If expectations for this season weren't so high, would we really be this frustrated with a sophomore guard averaging 12 ppg?
    I'm as guilty as anyone for getting on AW for a lack of aggressiveness at times, but I think taking a step back, we have the makings of an all-conference player.

    4. With 7 newcomers, I just don't think it was a good idea psyche-wise to schedule so difficult. I have said time and again how frustrated I was with the 4 Horizon League road games. But the more I think of it, I have a beef with the schedule as a whole for this group. A top 30 schedule doesn't do much for you if you don't beat any of the quality teams on the schedule. If we had a veteran group, with a large number of guys returning, then I say step it up and play the best. But this group needed a healthy mix of tough competition and confidence-building competition. That means 1-2 less road games, and perhaps a better distribution of our cupcakes and our resume-builders instead of all cupcakes, then a slew of top 25-caliber teams. We aren't experienced enough yet to handle that.

    5. A second point on the schedule - The timing of the games wasn't the best. We were getting better game-by-game when we were playing every 3-5 days. After Michigan St, we started going a week or more between games. That's no way to build momentum or continuity, especially with an inexperienced group. On that note, scheduling such difficult games during finals (arguably the most difficult part of the season to balance academics and athletics) is not a good idea. I think the results speak for themselves.

    6. We are NOT a deep team.
    I look at depth as being able to plug in several guys who you know will contribute. A truly 'deep' team would be able to overcome injuries to at least keep games close and competitive. Last year's seemingly shorthanded team won games without Dan Ruffin for 2 games, and without JC for 7 games. After seeing last night's game, I don't know who we could beat without everyone healthy. Right now, we can't really count on more than 6-7 guys every night. Egolf isn't ready to contribute yet, Cole-Scott is developing slowly, Collins is hit-or-miss and is mistake-prone, as is Singh. The only reserve that can really be counted for solid contributions every game is Maniscalco. That being said, I think it's time to shorten the bench, and play the guys you can trust. I am by no means giving up on any of the players mentioned above, but I think it's time to stop pretending we're a deep team. IMO, I think we need to go 8 deep, max. I think you'd find that the offensive flow and team defense would both improve.

    7. Jim still doesn't know who to play yet.
    That's kind of concerning after 12 games. I think shortening up the bench may help in that regard.

    8. Out of everything that has happened this non-conference season, the inconsistency and fundamental breakdowns regarding team defense is what concerns me the most.
    Defense is all effort and positioning, and BU is seriously deficient in consistent defensive efforts that put them in proper position. Watch the 2nd half of the Butler and VCU games for some perfect examples of this. We were beat repeatedly on fundamental backdoor cuts by Butler, and refused to slide over and take a charge as VCU did the layup drill last night. How many charges has this team taken this year? How many have our opponents taken? I don't know the exact numbers, but I assure you that our opponents are doing a MUCH better job of taking charges than we are. A lack of charges is a tell-tale sign of a team that plays poor team defense. When we don't defend, we don't win. We've rarely defended well through the first 12 games.

    9. If there's any positive to Ruffin's injury, it's that it may allow DR to have fresher legs in February and March when our tournament lives are truly on the line.

    10. I don't want to hear Jim 'call out' the fans anymore.
    The fans are traveling in droves to Chicago and Dayton and Indy. The fans are filling up Carver. The fans were ready last night to go nuts. Ruffin or no Ruffin, that 2nd half effort was garbage. Fans aren't going to keep coming out to see these 2nd half embarassments, and will sour if the coach keeps 'calling them out' publicly. The product on the floor will put people in the stands. The product has been pretty average in December (at least compared to what we were told to expect this season).

    11. Last night pretty much sealed our fate as far as not getting an at-large without winning the regular season crown.
    We went 2-2 against a supposedly inferior league (Horizon), were embarrassed at home by a Colonial team, and have no noteworthy non-conference wins. A road win over Wright St will not be remotely close to being enough to warrant at-large consideration. It will take an MVC regular season crown to get in without winning the league. A win last night, and I think we start getting closer to being an at-large candidate even with a 2nd place finish.

    12. From what I have seen, this team is more than good enough to win this league. I look at the schedule, and I find it hard not to count 12-13 more wins, even with our current problems. Injuries could obviously change that, but we should not lose any more home games, and I think there are at least 3-5 road games that should be wins. 2006 taught us not to write a team off, and I certainly am not writing these guys off.

    Sorry about the long post, but I think it's time for some reflection as we head into the conference season. There's 20 games left, and a LOT can happen. Writing off the season would be absolutely foolish right now. But, thinking we don't have some things to resolve quickly would be equally foolish. Support the team, trust the coaches, and let's see what happens.

    Fans, players, coaches - Merry Christmas everyone!
    Onward and Upward!

  • #2
    Very nice post BradleyBrave - well said!

    Comment


    • #3
      Great post.
      Our D, especially against VCU, was awful. Rotation was awful, weak side help was worse, and there was not any help with a lost man.
      The team, as a whole did not look like a team that had 13 games, incl. exhibitions, and 2 months of practice under their belt


      Oh heck, its Christmas Eve day, and I do not want to get all upset again.
      Great Post and Merry CHRISTmas to all.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well thought out post, BB...I agree with the majority of what you have said here...however, I'm not sure that I can fully buy in to your point #12. I just can't look at this team right now and say that they have what it takes to win the Valley this year.
        This team is the softest collection of players I have seen in a long time. I know Ronnie Wright does a good job in building their bodies up and giving them additional strength, but these guys just don't appear to have the psyche to use it on the basketball floor. Theron Wilson is the one exception I see...but other than him, it looks to me like every other guy that gets significant minutes for this team is absolutely scared to death of contact...and that is most troubling to me when we are heading into the tough Valley schedule. JC, AW, and TCS are so soft when they are trying to finish around the rim...we saw it 10 or 15 times against VCU...they had a dozen chances to finish strong at the rim, draw some contact and go to the line, maybe get a 3-point play...but instead you ended up with some weak little flip up toward the rim as they were falling away from contact. Nauseatingly soft.
        And Matt Salley...our 'post presence'...has a repertoire of 37 different post moves, all of which involve some sort of a spin and end up with him fading away from contact and shooting some awkward looking fall away jumper. Just once I want to see him catch the ball in the post and lean into someone to create some separation for himself and then take it up strong...like real post players do...but he doesn't have that in him. Collins is the one big that we have that appears capable of catching the ball in the post and backing someone down and actually executing a post move that has him moving toward the basket as he is shooting, but he is so lost right now in all aspects of the game that Les can't play him.

        I don't know...I haven't given up...but I am hugely disappointed in the development of this team so far. I was duped into believing that this was the most talented team Les has had...I nodded along with Snell when he was toting the company lines, "this is an NCAA team", "only a matter of when, not if, TCS becomes a star in this league"...etc., etc...but with 12 games of visual evidence now, I can't blindly buy into the hype anymore. I see an OK team that isn't deep, doesn't seem to have a good grasp on the offense or defense that we are trying to run, and continually loses composure at critical junctures of games.

        Can it get better...sure. I hope it does...but it just seems to me that these personnel rotations and fundamental problems we continue to have on offense and defense that we are 'going back to the drawing board on' now should have been things that we got ironed out after the St. Ambrose game or the Quincy game, or at least before we went down to South Padre. We're 12 games in and 5 days away from the Valley schedule, and we still can't find 8 guys that we can play in a consistent rotation on a nightly basis. And if this team doesn't find some inner angst, a little mean streak, and a whole lot of fire and toughness inside, they are going to get pushed around night after night after night by less talented, but much tougher Valley teams.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by ER3 View Post
          Well thought out post, BB...I agree with the majority of what you have said here...however, I'm not sure that I can fully buy in to your point #12. I just can't look at this team right now and say that they have what it takes to win the Valley this year.
          This team is the softest collection of players I have seen in a long time. I know Ronnie Wright does a good job in building their bodies up and giving them additional strength, but these guys just don't appear to have the psyche to use it on the basketball floor. Theron Wilson is the one exception I see...but other than him, it looks to me like every other guy that gets significant minutes for this team is absolutely scared to death of contact...and that is most troubling to me when we are heading into the tough Valley schedule. JC, AW, and TCS are so soft when they are trying to finish around the rim...we saw it 10 or 15 times against VCU...they had a dozen chances to finish strong at the rim, draw some contact and go to the line, maybe get a 3-point play...but instead you ended up with some weak little flip up toward the rim as they were falling away from contact. Nauseatingly soft.
          And Matt Salley...our 'post presence'...has a repertoire of 37 different post moves, all of which involve some sort of a spin and end up with him fading away from contact and shooting some awkward looking fall away jumper. Just once I want to see him catch the ball in the post and lean into someone to create some separation for himself and then take it up strong...like real post players do...but he doesn't have that in him. Collins is the one big that we have that appears capable of catching the ball in the post and backing someone down and actually executing a post move that has him moving toward the basket as he is shooting, but he is so lost right now in all aspects of the game that Les can't play him.

          I don't know...I haven't given up...but I am hugely disappointed in the development of this team so far. I was duped into believing that this was the most talented team Les has had...I nodded along with Snell when he was toting the company lines, "this is an NCAA team", "only a matter of when, not if, TCS becomes a star in this league"...etc., etc...but with 12 games of visual evidence now, I can't blindly buy into the hype anymore. I see an OK team that isn't deep, doesn't seem to have a good grasp on the offense or defense that we are trying to run, and continually loses composure at critical junctures of games.

          Can it get better...sure. I hope it does...but it just seems to me that these personnel rotations and fundamental problems we continue to have on offense and defense that we are 'going back to the drawing board on' now should have been things that we got ironed out after the St. Ambrose game or the Quincy game, or at least before we went down to South Padre. We're 12 games in and 5 days away from the Valley schedule, and we still can't find 8 guys that we can play in a consistent rotation on a nightly basis. And if this team doesn't find some inner angst, a little mean streak, and a whole lot of fire and toughness inside, they are going to get pushed around night after night after night by less talented, but much tougher Valley teams.
          Boy! How did everybody get so smart all of a sudden?

          I really agree with the "soft" and you did not even mention how SOFT we are on the boards.
          Or that we have " a top 25 recruiting class." Other than Sammy and Theron, where is it?
          !

          Comment


          • #6
            I see some people are pretty upset that BU has had only an NIT season and a 7-5 record thus far this season to show since their Sweet Sixteen run.

            Let's see how George Washington has done since their 26-2 season the same year BU was in the Sweet 16.

            First....George Washington head coach Karl Hobbs turned down numerous lucrative positions at bigger and probably better schools to stay at GWU.
            And surely their good season led to fantastic recruiting....right?

            Well..they had a little fall-off last year, then.......

            This year GWU is off to a 4-5 start, no road wins, and the only teams they have beaten are Mount St. Mary's (not St. Mary's), Boston U. (not Boston College), UMES (everyone's patsy), and Longwood (whoa!).
            GWU has lost to powerhouses such as Binghamton and Maryland-Baltimore County!
            Their RPI is 239, and the teams they have beaten are 168, 275, 327, and 317

            Bradley is among the TOP THREE RPI's in the Valley, and a good Valley season doesn't totally rule out we could even get an AT LARGE NCAA bid, but we're almost a lock for at least an NIT bid barring a sub-500 MVC season.
            George Washington's RPI ranks them 12th in their conference, pretty much alrteady out of the running for just about any postseason play!

            Such is the life of just about all mid-majors....a year to year battle just to stay on the map. Hopefully BU can still finish strong in the final 19 regular season games and the tourney.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by tornado View Post
              I see some people are pretty upset that BU has had only an NIT season and a 7-5 record thus far this season to show since their Sweet Sixteen run.

              Let's see how George Washington has done since their Final Four run the same year BU was in the Sweet 16.

              First....George Washington head coach Karl Hobbs turned down numerous lucrative positions at bigger and probably better schools to stay at GWU.
              And surely their Final Four run led to fantastic recruiting....right?

              Well..they had a little fall-off last year, then.......

              This year GWU is off to a 4-5 start, no road wins, and the only teams they have beaten are Mount St. Mary's (not St. Mary's), Boston U. (not Boston College), UMES (everyone's patsy), and Longwood (whoa!).
              GWU has lost to powerhouses such as Binghamton and Maryland-Baltimore County!
              Their RPI is 239, and the teams they have beaten are 168, 275, 327, and 317

              Bradley is among the TOP THREE RPI's in the Valley, and a good Valley season doesn't totally rule out we could even get an AT LARGE NCAA bid, but we're almost a lock for at least an NIT bid barring a sub-500 MVC season.
              George Washington's RPI ranks them 12th in their conference, pretty much alrteady out of the running for just about any postseason play!

              Such is the life of just about all mid-majors....a year to year battle just to stay on the map. Hopefully BU can still finish strong in the final 19 regular season games and the tourney.
              Your point is valid, except George Washington lost to Duke in the second round that year. George Mason made the Final Four and they are 8-3 with an RPI of 21 this year, best in the Colonial.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by pfunk880 View Post
                Your point is valid, except George Washington lost to Duke in the second round that year. George Mason made the Final Four and they are 8-3 with an RPI of 21 this year, best in the Colonial.
                You're right - it was Geo Mason. But Jerry Palm's site, collegerpi.com, has them at 34 (with an SOS of 26).

                They have an 11 pt win over Dayton (home), 10 pt win vs Kans St (neutral), and a 1pt win vs S Carolina (neutral).

                However, they lost by 8 pts to Villanova (neutral), East Carolina by 3 (home - E Carolina is 189 in the RPI), and by 18 at Kent (road).

                Comment


                • #9
                  sorry for the confusion...but with just a tiny alteration of the original post, my premise still stands....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by tornado View Post
                    I see some people are pretty upset that BU has had only an NIT season and a 7-5 record thus far this season to show since their Sweet Sixteen run.

                    Let's see how George Washington has done since their 26-2 season the same year BU was in the Sweet 16.

                    First....George Washington head coach Karl Hobbs turned down numerous lucrative positions at bigger and probably better schools to stay at GWU.
                    And surely their good season led to fantastic recruiting....right?

                    Well..they had a little fall-off last year, then.......

                    This year GWU is off to a 4-5 start, no road wins, and the only teams they have beaten are Mount St. Mary's (not St. Mary's), Boston U. (not Boston College), UMES (everyone's patsy), and Longwood (whoa!).
                    GWU has lost to powerhouses such as Binghamton and Maryland-Baltimore County!
                    Their RPI is 239, and the teams they have beaten are 168, 275, 327, and 317

                    Bradley is among the TOP THREE RPI's in the Valley, and a good Valley season doesn't totally rule out we could even get an AT LARGE NCAA bid, but we're almost a lock for at least an NIT bid barring a sub-500 MVC season.
                    George Washington's RPI ranks them 12th in their conference, pretty much alrteady out of the running for just about any postseason play!

                    Such is the life of just about all mid-majors....a year to year battle just to stay on the map. Hopefully BU can still finish strong in the final 19 regular season games and the tourney.
                    This is so classic.. What does GW have to do with us? Does our program aspire to be GW or to be SIU and Creighton?
                    Can we start winning soon?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They have fans, and their fans are not yet ready to panic, like apparently some of BU's fan.
                      Just a simple example, try not to read too much into it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by tornado View Post
                        I see some people are pretty upset that BU has had only an NIT season and a 7-5 record thus far this season to show since their Sweet Sixteen run.

                        Bradley is among the TOP THREE RPI's in the Valley, and a good Valley season doesn't totally rule out we could even get an AT LARGE NCAA bid, but we're almost a lock for at least an NIT bid barring a sub-500 MVC season.
                        George Washington's RPI ranks them 12th in their conference, pretty much alrteady out of the running for just about any postseason play!

                        Such is the life of just about all mid-majors....a year to year battle just to stay on the map. Hopefully BU can still finish strong in the final 19 regular season games and the tourney.
                        I could care less about how George Washington, George Mason, or George of the Jungle are doing. This is a discussion about the state of BU basketball...this year. You are simply bringing other teams and BU's past successes into the conversation to confuse the issue.
                        I loved the Sweet 16 season...I was unbelievably proud at the way the team overacheived last year and made the NIT...those teams aren't what is being discussed here. The team that is being discussed here is this year's team..."THE MOST TALENTED TEAM THAT LES HAS EVER HAD AT BU"...and while the season isn't over, and there are still chances to play up to the coach's assessment before the year is over...this team has been disappointing so far.
                        They are 7-5 with 1 decent road win (Wright St.), 1 marginal home win (Iowa State), and 5 other wins over some of the worst teams in all of Div I basketball (teams with RPIs of 327, 237, 257, 313, 218 ). As a result, BU's RPI of 69 at this point is largely fictional and meaningless to me...They scheduled some good teams and lost to all of them, so that equates to a really average Div I team, in my mind. Not a team that is top 60 or 70 in the country.
                        I apologize if my pessimism is not what the optimists on the board want to see. I still am a fan, I still desperately want this team to do well, to make the tournament, but I can't just sit back and watch the lack of progress that I have seen in this team and in certain individuals on this team over the last 12 games and get on this message board and make blindly optimistic generalizations like "no need to worry...we'll clean up these problems before the Valley opener"..."it'll all be OK, I still think we will win the Valley"..."we're talented, they'll all pull it together in time to make the NCAA tourney".
                        This was a young and (supposedly) uber-talented team that was going to take some time to come together...I understood that...but we are twelve games in, and I guess I expected more progress than I have seen (maybe that's my fault for having expectations, maybe it's Les' fault for making so many glowing comments that built those expectations...)...SM and TW appear to have stepped it up and are playing well in their roles...but DC, WE, RA, and TCS are quickly playing themselves into complete non-factors this season...and it is a bit disturbing to me that they seem to be regressing a bit instead of progressing...They are first year Div I players, so the adjustment time is certainly expected, and no one should have expected them to all hit the ground running and average double figure scoring this year or anything of the sort...but I guess I just want to see them develop into the type of players this year that can do one or two little things well...whether that's rebounding, playing defense, setting screens, or just knowing where you are supposed to be in the offensive and defensive sets...Over the past two games, Collins has been completely and totally lost on both ends of the court in his limited playing time...He looks like he's a guy that just walked off of the streets and was handed the playbook 2 days ago, and that is frustrating because I really thought he was showing some great progress before the last two games came around.
                        I am a pessimist...I can't change that...but I am also a diehard BU fan...don't confuse this fact...the two elements are not mutually exclusive of each other. Being a fan does not mean that you never make a negative assessment of the team or the individuals that you root for. If those BU fans that are eternal optimists can watch the Butler game and the VCU game and come home and see the silver lining in it all and hold onto to some RPI number of 69 as proof that everything is going to be fine, then more power to you...I can't see it that way. I was pessimistic about the Sweet 16 team at this same point in the season, too...so hopefully there is similar magic in store for this year's squad...We just need to hope that Ruffin can get healthy and a whole lot of light bulbs start going off in the heads of some of these Div I newcomers...otherwise, we are likely in for a long, frustrating, underacheiving, up-and-down season.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by tornado View Post
                          They have fans, and their fans are not yet ready to panic, like apparently some of BU's fan.
                          Just a simple example, try not to read too much into it.
                          I am not paniced, I just want to know when my expectations should be to finish in the top 3 in the Valley.
                          Can we start winning soon?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by tornado View Post
                            They have fans, and their fans are not yet ready to panic, like apparently some of BU's fan.
                            Just a simple example, try not to read too much into it.
                            Dunno if the 'panic' part was aimed at my post, but I certainly am not panicking. If anything, I think that those who are panicking about the team and program need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Obviously we would have liked to get one of those 'signature' wins, but the conference season will tell the tale (it always does). Yes, we have some problems that need rectifying. But so does every other team in the league this year. IMO, the Ruffin injury issue (and injuries in general) is the only one that can keep this team from reaching its eventual goal.
                            Onward and Upward!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by ER3 View Post
                              I could care less about how George Washington, George Mason, or George of the Jungle are doing. This is a discussion about the state of BU basketball...this year. You are simply bringing other teams and BU's past successes into the conversation to confuse the issue.
                              I loved the Sweet 16 season...I was unbelievably proud at the way the team overacheived last year and made the NIT...those teams aren't what is being discussed here. The team that is being discussed here is this year's team..."THE MOST TALENTED TEAM THAT LES HAS EVER HAD AT BU"...and while the season isn't over, and there are still chances to play up to the coach's assessment before the year is over...this team has been disappointing so far.
                              They are 7-5 with 1 decent road win (Wright St.), 1 marginal home win (Iowa State), and 5 other wins over some of the worst teams in all of Div I basketball (teams with RPIs of 327, 237, 257, 313, 218 ). As a result, BU's RPI of 69 at this point is largely fictional and meaningless to me...They scheduled some good teams and lost to all of them, so that equates to a really average Div I team, in my mind. Not a team that is top 60 or 70 in the country.
                              I apologize if my pessimism is not what the optimists on the board want to see. I still am a fan, I still desperately want this team to do well, to make the tournament, but I can't just sit back and watch the lack of progress that I have seen in this team and in certain individuals on this team over the last 12 games and get on this message board and make blindly optimistic generalizations like "no need to worry...we'll clean up these problems before the Valley opener"..."it'll all be OK, I still think we will win the Valley"..."we're talented, they'll all pull it together in time to make the NCAA tourney".
                              This was a young and (supposedly) uber-talented team that was going to take some time to come together...I understood that...but we are twelve games in, and I guess I expected more progress than I have seen (maybe that's my fault for having expectations, maybe it's Les' fault for making so many glowing comments that built those expectations...)...SM and TW appear to have stepped it up and are playing well in their roles...but DC, WE, RA, and TCS are quickly playing themselves into complete non-factors this season...and it is a bit disturbing to me that they seem to be regressing a bit instead of progressing...They are first year Div I players, so the adjustment time is certainly expected, and no one should have expected them to all hit the ground running and average double figure scoring this year or anything of the sort...but I guess I just want to see them develop into the type of players this year that can do one or two little things well...whether that's rebounding, playing defense, setting screens, or just knowing where you are supposed to be in the offensive and defensive sets...Over the past two games, Collins has been completely and totally lost on both ends of the court in his limited playing time...He looks like he's a guy that just walked off of the streets and was handed the playbook 2 days ago, and that is frustrating because I really thought he was showing some great progress before the last two games came around.
                              I am a pessimist...I can't change that...but I am also a diehard BU fan...don't confuse this fact...the two elements are not mutually exclusive of each other. Being a fan does not mean that you never make a negative assessment of the team or the individuals that you root for. If those BU fans that are eternal optimists can watch the Butler game and the VCU game and come home and see the silver lining in it all and hold onto to some RPI number of 69 as proof that everything is going to be fine, then more power to you...I can't see it that way. I was pessimistic about the Sweet 16 team at this same point in the season, too...so hopefully there is similar magic in store for this year's squad...We just need to hope that Ruffin can get healthy and a whole lot of light bulbs start going off in the heads of some of these Div I newcomers...otherwise, we are likely in for a long, frustrating, underacheiving, up-and-down season.
                              You do sound like a hopeless pessimist!:-|

                              Bradley is one injury away from being 8-4 instead of 7-5. IMO Bradley would have kept Eric Maynor in check and won the game against VCU if Daniel Ruffin was able to play. If that had happened, all this discussion would not be happening. This team is better than you portray in your post. The win at Wright State was a good road win against a team that had just beaten Butler, yet you can only concede that it was "decent". The win over Iowa State has turned into a decent home win, since Iowa State RPI is 110 (in the upper 1/3 of Div I). Yet you can only grant that it was a "marginal" win. And Bradley's RPI of 68 is well deserved because of their SOS of 27, yet you say it is "fictional" and "meaningless".
                              Most fans here would differ with you on all these assessments. IMO, Bradley will be OK if Daniel Ruffin is able to recover.

                              Comment

                              Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X