I think JL should change the line up what do you think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
starting line up
Collapse
X
-
OK, I agree...I think Les should start:
Patrick O'Bryant
Marcellus Sommerville
Theron Wilson
Daniel Ruffin
Jeremy Crouch
Unfortunately, with this year's squad, I don't see a lot of options that Les has...What are your ideas?
Ruffin, Crouch, and Wilson would almost have to start...
As inconsistent as he may be, Warren is still pretty much a lock as the 4th starter...
Then you have to start a big...so pick one from Salley, Collins, Singh...and there you go...pretty much what we have...
Maniscalco can't start in the backcourt with Ruff...we would be way too small...
Cole-Scott, Egolf, and Austin simply aren't capable Division I basketball players right now...they simply can't be trusted with meaningful minutes...
So I just don't see what options we really have to significantly shake up the playing time...For all of this supposed depth we had coming into the season, we suddenly appear to be pretty thin on guys that can be trusted to give us decent minutes...
Comment
-
I agree we probably will see a different lineup on Sat and that will be decided in practice over the next two days but....right now I don't see anybody making a very strong case to move off the bench into the starting lineup. Collins fouls too darn much, doesn't play defense and does not rebound. Cole-Scott looked better tonight but has not shown much yet. Egolf has been absent for a while now. Sam M-I really did not see much tonight. Sam Singh ?? So, I would not be surprised to see a change but I'm not sure who is going to step up.houstonbrave
Comment
-
I think my starting lineup would have to be Ruffin, Crouch, Wilson, Austin, and Collins. Just let them play. I don't particularly see things getting much better if they don't have someone step up. From all indications right now, Salley misses way too many point blank shots and Singh is only really effective against other beefy slow guys. I know we don't know much about Austin but he has the body to get after it and make some things happen. Collins needs to be in the game to make something happen around the basket. If he blows a couple assignments on D teach him to do differently. It doesn't seem to be too positive sitting him out because the opposition scores inside when hes on the bench as well.
Who's with me?.............FREE RASHAD AUSTIN!!!!!! From some trends I've seen lately it couldn't be much worse.Go small or go home!
Comment
-
Originally posted by buballer82 View PostI think my starting lineup would have to be Ruffin, Crouch, Wilson, Austin, and Collins. Just let them play. I don't particularly see things getting much better if they don't have someone step up. From all indications right now, Salley misses way too many point blank shots and Singh is only really effective against other beefy slow guys. I know we don't know much about Austin but he has the body to get after it and make some things happen. Collins needs to be in the game to make something happen around the basket. If he blows a couple assignments on D teach him to do differently. It doesn't seem to be too positive sitting him out because the opposition scores inside when hes on the bench as well.
Who's with me?.............FREE RASHAD AUSTIN!!!!!! From some trends I've seen lately it couldn't be much worse.
as far as collins. he's big and the game does change a little when he gets in but he too is completely lost on both ends of the floor. salley just makes things work better. he knows our offense and plays it well. i think it will just take time for him. hopefully by the end of the year both he and austin will be capable of participating in an offensive attack.
Comment
-
I still believe DC should be in the starting line up.
As to what combination of players is needed to be able to beat a Michigan State, Vanderbilt, or Butler, I put the obligation on the coaching staff to improve our inside game. This Bradley team might well win the regular season conference title and could also win the tournament in St. Louis. But, we will get thumped in a first round NCAA game unless we develop DC and RA. This team's strength is its guard play, but it will never reach its full potential until an inside game is established and becomes a legitimate part of our offense.
If I was JL, I would use the semester break to conduct 2-3 hour daily mini-camps for our big men and also adjust the offensive scheme. A lot of people observed that Bradley's D was horrible in the 2nd half of the Butler game. I think it was a result of Butler exploiting Bradley's short lineup ... Butler got several layups and short jumpers due to player mismatches and then drained the open 3 when Bradley's D collapsed to the middle to offset its lack of height. I like this team's heart and hustle, but I haven't seen much development since watching them in person in South Padre.
After the game, I visted with an old friend who was a very successful D1 guard in the early 80's and is now a Butler season ticket holder. His first comment was what an ugly game it was ... and I don't think he was referring to the Bulldogs.
There are a lot of good players on our team and we have a great coaching staff, but somehow, someway the pieces are not coming together when we have a game against a top-notch opponent.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dallas Brave View PostI still believe DC should be in the starting line up.
As to what combination of players is needed to be able to beat a Michigan State, Vanderbilt, or Butler, I put the obligation on the coaching staff to improve our inside game. This Bradley team might well win the regular season conference title and could also win the tournament in St. Louis. But, we will get thumped in a first round NCAA game unless we develop DC and RA. This team's strength is its guard play, but it will never reach its full potential until an inside game is established and becomes a legitimate part of our offense.
If I was JL, I would use the semester break to conduct 2-3 hour daily mini-camps for our big men and also adjust the offensive scheme. A lot of people observed that Bradley's D was horrible in the 2nd half of the Butler game. I think it was a result of Butler exploiting Bradley's short lineup ... Butler got several layups and short jumpers due to player mismatches and then drained the open 3 when Bradley's D collapsed to the middle to offset its lack of height. I like this team's heart and hustle, but I haven't seen much development since watching them in person in South Padre.
After the game, I visted with an old friend who was a very successful D1 guard in the early 80's and is now a Butler season ticket holder. His first comment was what an ugly game it was ... and I don't think he was referring to the Bulldogs.
There are a lot of good players on our team and we have a great coaching staff, but somehow, someway the pieces are not coming together when we have a game against a top-notch opponent.Bradley 72 - Illini 68 Final
???It??™s awful hard,??™??™ said Illini freshman guard D.J. Richardson, the former Central High School guard who played prep school ball a few miles from here and fought back tears outside the locker room. ???It??™s a hometown thing. It??™s bragging rights.??™
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment