Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Bradley Conference Realignment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by tomahawk chop View Post
    We are right where we belong simply because of the overall cost it would take to send all your teams to the East. The Valley needs to look to expand more and 16 teams seems like a good number.
    Would LOVE to see that too!
    But be selective above who to bring in...Middle TN, Kent St., Milwaukee could be options...W Kentucky but they have a solid football program

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by LittleBrave View Post
      I am a bit surprised with all the love for the Big East. I can't stand most of the teams in the conf. - other than Butler, Creighton, DePaul...maybe Marquette
      Would hate to trade a rivalry with ISU or Northern Iowa with St. John's or Georgetown. I can see how DePaul is a better fit vs teams like that, but not Bradley.
      The only conference I envy is the Mountain West, as we were about their equal 10 yrs ago, but they took off and we regressed, but have come back a little stronger the last few seasons. Would be nice to get the MVC stronger to about 7th or 8th again, but I think the NIL doesn't do schools like Valpo and Evansville much justice, and we'll (MVC) hover around 9th strongest for a while.
      First, why would BU establish a rivalry with St. John's or Georgetown instead of Butler, Creighton, Depaul, or Marquette if they were in the Big East? It would almost assuredly be one of the those three teams that are relatively closer to BU. I would absolutely take a rivalry with anyone in the BIG East over ISU as well. We would be playing much better teams with much better exposure that would elevate BU as well. In addition the share of the TV deal revenue would more than pay for any additional travel expense.

      In regards to the MWC vs MVC, look at what the MVC lost, Creighton (Almost annually Top 25 team now that they are in the Big East), and Wichita State (While down now, they were amazing while in the MVC). In addition the teams added to the MVC have either jumped like Loyola, or been baaad programs like Valpo. Belmont and Murray St. have both under performed IMO since joining the MVC. MWC benefits from football in a way that the MVC can't do, which has bolstered their conference. Their teams are also in bigger markets generally and are more prosperous schools than MVC schools.
      Thinking is the hardest work, that is why so few people do it. -Henry Ford

      Yeah...I've been in college for a while now and I'm pretty sure that awesomest is not a word. -Andrew E.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Stryker View Post

        I know I would rather be in a bigger tougher league and finish lower, than be in our current position where at-large bids are not realistic for our conference anymore, and even when we have a great team we see one other team in the league outperform expectations and take the AQ from us (Drake this year).
        I'd rather become the Gonzaga of the Valley.

        Comment


        • #19
          Other than men’s basketball, they have very little quality to add, to a potential conference.

          Comment

          Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

          Collapse
          Working...
          X