Originally posted by Tommy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
NIT or is season over?
Collapse
X
-
-
Heck - we have upper-classmen who barely played who supported the senior starters and team for years. I think Coach W should make the decision, with the benefit in mind of the younger guys to have post-season experience...if the starting seniors don't want to play, have the bench seniors play, who supposedly worked as hard as anyone else. Those guys and the fans are at least deserving of an opportunity to have the season continue.
Coach Wardle needs to stand up and say, "Hey we're puttin' on the Bradley unis one more time and if you don't want to have another chance, then you can just watch, and let that Drake game be your last ever in college."
Comment
-
Originally posted by LittleBrave View PostMaybe, just maybe (and I type this mostly with doubt), we will shockingly get an At-Large as we did in 2006 when we didn't really expect that.
Comment
-
Note that there is a new rule - LINK
The new NIT selection rules say the top team not selected for the NCAA tourney from each of the top 12 conferences
will get an “exempt bid” and at least one home game. Drake would have qualified and gotten that bid unless they got an NCAA bid based on the Quad-1 wins.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MacabreMob View Post
Not sure what you remember Little Brave, but in 2006 there were many of us that expected an at-large bid in 2006. Digger Phelps and his ilk were more surprised we got a bid and the MVC got 4 bids that year (the same for the ACC that year I believe). Now... back in '06, much of the traffic went thru a different message board and many there didn't think Bradley would get a bid - but that place was full of fans of other teams that were also a bunch of gas-lighters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yoda View PostNote that there is a new rule - LINK
The new NIT selection rules say the top team not selected for the NCAA tourney from each of the top 12 conferences
will get an “exempt bid” and at least one home game. Drake would have qualified and gotten that bid unless they got an NCAA bid based on the Quad-1 wins.
That would be insane if BU didn't get a home game, as they have to be one of the best 8 teams invited this season based on their resume, but it could happen. smh
Comment
-
As many will remember, the Missouri Valley Conference has a great history with the NIT. Unfortunately, under their new format for bids, none of the history, nor how well the fans support the team matter any more. Bradley has won the NIT 4 times (1957, 1960, 1964, and 1982), and they finished runner-up twice (1950 and 1959). Three other MVC teams have won the NIT (Wichita State 2011, Tulsa 1981, St. Louis 1948 ), and current member, SIU won it in 1967 before they joined the MVC. And last year, Indiana State beat SMU, Minnesota, Cincinnati, and Utah, before losing a close 79-77 game to Seton Hall in the 2024 NIT Championship game.
Wouldn't it be great if Bradley can reproduce some of that success with this year's team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ollienanyes View Posthttps://x.com/TheRealCSD/status/1899199807123558474
This has BU seeded 15'th with a home game. By the seeding (sum of both seeds = 33 rule) BU would host Florida State. But if they take regions into account, could be a rematch with Loyola or maybe even with Butler, SLU or UNI
Comment
-
I guess I'm in the minority. If the team's heart isn't going to be into playing in the NIT, then don't play. I don't want to see a half-ass effort and a 20 point loss. If the team can regroup and put their efforts into making a run in the NIT, then I'm all for it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LittleBrave View PostAmen to that - would be a shame to have the season end on such a sour note.
Not sure the incentive to win NIT games outweighs the chance to get to play with each other and for Braves’ fans one more time…or more
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment