I'll take a little bit of a nuanced approach to my opinion here:
I do not like coaches pulling scholarships for kids for just basketball reasons. If they mess up off the court, in the classroom, or are bad teammates then fine. Wardle doesn't seem to do that from the outside. He seems to give kids an honest assessment of where they are going in to next year and let them make their call. Most will leave if they don't have a guaranteed role, but guys like Linke and Biliew seemed to value their degrees and just the general experience of Bradley basketball. You made a commitment, so did they, and both sides honored it. Sometimes it can cost you depth and proper roster construction, as it did last year, but if a coach expects kids to follow through he must too.
However, that four year commitment has come to an end in this case. If he wants to come back as a walk-on then great, happy to have him. But when we could still use another point (or at least a combo guy) with some height, an athletic big, and a stronger center type big with our last three rides, I don't think it is a good idea to hand out wasted scholarships just for hard work. If we use those last three as stated, then we would have 7 guards (if you count Davis) and 6 posts (I'm putting Atlason and van der Knaap as stretch fours) with 3 point guards, which to me is ideal balance and roster construction, something we haven't had the last couple of years to our detriment at times. We were lucky injuries didn't take a huge toll. Imagine with Jim Les's injury luck where we would have been last year?
Now, will all 13 play? No. Will all 13 work out? No. Some won't work out and others make take a few years to (see Darius Hannah), but it'd be nice to have a roster of guys we at least see potential in working out on the court as well as off. I certainly don't want those guys at the end of the bench being bad teammates, and Linke certainly isn't that. In case of injury or other guys not working out, I just don't want to waste a scholarship knowing the on the court contribution will be extremely limited at best. We did end up needing to play him this year, and next year may be the most important year in this program's history with the way the college game is today. You have to take every chance to be relevant and good that you can.
So if absolutely nothing works out for a 13th scholarship in recruiting, then fine give it to him as we did the walk-ons this year. But there really is no excuse for that to be the case with the number of players out there right now. Thank you Connor Linke for being a great representative of Bradley, you're welcome to come back as a walk-on, but our four year scholarship commitment is done and you received your degree would be what I think of the situation. Being as though this situation seems to be in a holding pattern, that seems to be the approach Brian is taking anyway. I'm not going to through a fit if he's back as a scholarship guy, but that's not the direction I would take certainly at this point.
I do not like coaches pulling scholarships for kids for just basketball reasons. If they mess up off the court, in the classroom, or are bad teammates then fine. Wardle doesn't seem to do that from the outside. He seems to give kids an honest assessment of where they are going in to next year and let them make their call. Most will leave if they don't have a guaranteed role, but guys like Linke and Biliew seemed to value their degrees and just the general experience of Bradley basketball. You made a commitment, so did they, and both sides honored it. Sometimes it can cost you depth and proper roster construction, as it did last year, but if a coach expects kids to follow through he must too.
However, that four year commitment has come to an end in this case. If he wants to come back as a walk-on then great, happy to have him. But when we could still use another point (or at least a combo guy) with some height, an athletic big, and a stronger center type big with our last three rides, I don't think it is a good idea to hand out wasted scholarships just for hard work. If we use those last three as stated, then we would have 7 guards (if you count Davis) and 6 posts (I'm putting Atlason and van der Knaap as stretch fours) with 3 point guards, which to me is ideal balance and roster construction, something we haven't had the last couple of years to our detriment at times. We were lucky injuries didn't take a huge toll. Imagine with Jim Les's injury luck where we would have been last year?
Now, will all 13 play? No. Will all 13 work out? No. Some won't work out and others make take a few years to (see Darius Hannah), but it'd be nice to have a roster of guys we at least see potential in working out on the court as well as off. I certainly don't want those guys at the end of the bench being bad teammates, and Linke certainly isn't that. In case of injury or other guys not working out, I just don't want to waste a scholarship knowing the on the court contribution will be extremely limited at best. We did end up needing to play him this year, and next year may be the most important year in this program's history with the way the college game is today. You have to take every chance to be relevant and good that you can.
So if absolutely nothing works out for a 13th scholarship in recruiting, then fine give it to him as we did the walk-ons this year. But there really is no excuse for that to be the case with the number of players out there right now. Thank you Connor Linke for being a great representative of Bradley, you're welcome to come back as a walk-on, but our four year scholarship commitment is done and you received your degree would be what I think of the situation. Being as though this situation seems to be in a holding pattern, that seems to be the approach Brian is taking anyway. I'm not going to through a fit if he's back as a scholarship guy, but that's not the direction I would take certainly at this point.
Comment