The 3 commissioners from the Big Ten, ACC, and Pac-12 announced late yesterday that they have formed an "Alliance" which aims to "stabilize a volatile environment" in college football. The details are scarce, and so far there are only verbal agreements, no contracts, and nothing in writing, but some of the comments I heard are that they claim this is necessary to "save college football" from the actions of the SEC poaching Texas and Oklahoma from the Big-12.
Oddly, the Big-12 was not involved at all in this "Alliance". That might to be somewhat of a death knell for what is left of the Big-12.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...-sec-back-off/
https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...nt-environment
As always, this move is mostly about football, mainly FBS, which is where the schools get most of their revenue. However, it will have a significant effect on lower-level football schools and on non-football schools.
How will this affect the mid-major schools like Bradley? Hard to say at this early stage, but another comment from the 3 commissioners yesterday was that "the scheduling component for football and women's and men's basketball will begin as soon as practical while honoring current contractual obligations."
This suggests the "Alliance" will lead to more scheduled games in men's and women's basketball among the members of these 3 Power Conferences (Big 10, ACC, & Pac-12), which would obviously lead to fewer chances for mid-majors to get games scheduled against the big boys, and few, if any, chances for mid-majors to appear on national TV.
It's possible that in time the 68-team NCAA tournament will evolve and contain fewer, maybe no, mid-major at-large teams, and possibly could even be modified to include fewer mid-major auto-bids. IMO, there is no way this is good for the mid-majors.
Oddly, the Big-12 was not involved at all in this "Alliance". That might to be somewhat of a death knell for what is left of the Big-12.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...-sec-back-off/
https://www.espn.com/college-footbal...nt-environment
As always, this move is mostly about football, mainly FBS, which is where the schools get most of their revenue. However, it will have a significant effect on lower-level football schools and on non-football schools.
How will this affect the mid-major schools like Bradley? Hard to say at this early stage, but another comment from the 3 commissioners yesterday was that "the scheduling component for football and women's and men's basketball will begin as soon as practical while honoring current contractual obligations."
This suggests the "Alliance" will lead to more scheduled games in men's and women's basketball among the members of these 3 Power Conferences (Big 10, ACC, & Pac-12), which would obviously lead to fewer chances for mid-majors to get games scheduled against the big boys, and few, if any, chances for mid-majors to appear on national TV.
It's possible that in time the 68-team NCAA tournament will evolve and contain fewer, maybe no, mid-major at-large teams, and possibly could even be modified to include fewer mid-major auto-bids. IMO, there is no way this is good for the mid-majors.
Comment