Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Hostile and abusive mascot update

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hostile and abusive mascot update



    Arkansas State, whose nickname and mascot is the Indians, has finally concluded a committee review and recommended changing their name and mascot.

  • #2
    Re: Hostile and abusive mascot update

    Originally posted by Da Coach
    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=2908824&campaign=rss&source=NCAAHeadlines

    Arkansas State, whose nickname and mascot is the Indians, has finally concluded a committee review and recommended changing their name and mascot.
    Arkansas State is moving right along with their movement to drop their Indian mascot. Their chancellor today announced they would officially retire their Indian mascot and form a Mascot Selection Steering Committee to solicit ideas for a new mascot.
    The chancellor at Arkansas State said the school would retire its Indian mascot, targeted by an NCAA ban on mascots that are ethnically or racially hostile or abusive.


    The Arkansas State macot was a silly Indian caricature, similar to one Bradley dropped decades ago.--


    This move shows that Arkansas State is a bit slower than all other schools to comply with the 2005 edict by the NCAA to ban ethnically or racially hostile or abusive mascots and nicknames. It has only taken them 2 years to decide they would comply with the mascot part of the ban.
    But what about the nickname part of the ban? Despite their reluctant move to drop their Indian mascot, they retain their nickname The Indians and The Lady Indians. It seems to me that these nicknames are just as ethnically hostile and abusive as the mascot. Yet they have no plans to change them and the NCAA hasn't demanded it.
    Well, nobody ever accused the NCAA of being consistent with this thing.--
    JONESBORO (7/20/07) - The Arkansas State volleyball team has received the Gameplan/AVCA Team Academic Award for the 2006-2007 academic year.

    Comment


    • #3
      Until they require Notre Dame to change their mascot and name, then this is all hypocritical bureaucracy.
      Onward and Upward!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by BradleyBrave
        Until they require Notre Dame to change their mascot and name, then this is all hypocritical bureaucracy.
        Agreed! and I'm usually left leaning too...

        Comment


        • #5
          In light of the Vick case,
          How long until some animal rights groups wans to ban using Bulldogs as a mascot as it "promotes hostile and abusive behavior towards dogs."
          At least people were not lynching and killing Indians due to the "Braves"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by BradleyBrave
            Until they require Notre Dame to change their mascot and name, then this is all hypocritical bureaucracy.
            As an Irish-American I'm all for the ND mascot hehe, and agree it's all hypocritical... Though I think there's a much better example of the hypocracy.

            SD State (I think) is the Aztecs. They are not required to change their mascot/name because the Aztecs aren't Indians from the USA.
            My sports blog.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by thefish7
              Originally posted by BradleyBrave
              Until they require Notre Dame to change their mascot and name, then this is all hypocritical bureaucracy.
              As an Irish-American I'm all for the ND mascot hehe, and agree it's all hypocritical... Though I think there's a much better example of the hypocracy.

              SD State (I think) is the Aztecs. They are not required to change their mascot/name because the Aztecs aren't Indians from the USA.
              Great example fish. Also, surveys have found that most people with Native American heritage either a.) don't care, or b.) like the fact that teams are named after them. I don't want to open this Pandora's Box again because I don't have the time to discuss it at length, but I think you all know where I stand on the issue.
              Onward and Upward!

              Comment


              • #8
                What about team names like Pioneers, Vikings, Norse, etc...
                and even team names like Deacons, Padres, etc..

                Many of us are direct descendants of the very people those shcools are characterizing and at times poking fun at.

                Hypocrisy is the right word.

                Until every school in America chooses a mascot that's a plant or tree, the argument will never be solved.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Hostile and abusive mascot update

                  Originally posted by Da Coach
                  The Arkansas State macot was a silly Indian caricature, similar to one Bradley dropped decades ago.--

                  Silly?! I thought ours was a great mascot

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Don't you remember Brad E. Lee?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Da Coach
                      Don't you remember Brad E. Lee?
                      Oh my God! Is that who you were talking about? That was the absolute worst...........................

                      Comment

                      Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                      Collapse
                      Working...
                      X