Or if it has, I missed it and I apologize....but with the way some on this board follow Ritchie McKay and all his reported transgressions, his new job doesnt even get talked about. I know someone linked this but no discussion?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Cant believe this hasnt been talked about
Collapse
X
-
It was brought up, but I think most people felt that McKay kind of got the "just desserts" of his illegal and unethical recruiting practices.
His team went south and played pretty poorly, even with Danny Granger, and now stinks royally.
He has recruited too many selfish thugs, and has never shown repentence for his blatant recruiting violations when he tampered with BU's best player.
And he was finally dismissed unceremoniously with drastically declining attendance and interest.
Good for Ritchie is he gets a chance to start over.
I am all for it if he gets a second chance.
But please, Ritchie, learn your lesson.
Recruit the good kids out of high school, and build your program with kids you coach, not with other teams' talent.
-
It was mentioned at the bottom of the coaching carousel thread--
I don't think there are many here who "follow" Ritchie McKay. There are many Bradley fans who still harbor resentment toward McKay and Duane Broussard, as they contributed to talking Danny Granger into transferring from Bradley to New Mexico in January, 2003. That was right in the middle of Jim Les' first season as coach, and midway through Granger's sophomore season. Granger's transfer sabotaged that 2002-2003 season and the next 2 for Bradley and Jim Les.
Had there not been such repeated and numerous illegal phone calls from McKay and Broussard, Granger would have likely stayed at Bradley. Granger hadn't shown much in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley to that point, and there would not have been another Div I coach that would have taken him then. He would not have left Bradley and sought a transfer if not for McKay.
IMO, Bradley would have had a winning record in Jim Les' first 3 seasons, and pretty good teams in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 with Granger, Sommerville, etc.
On the other hand, New Mexico would have been awful without Granger. They made it to the NCAA tournament in 2005 (Granger's senior season) with an upset in their MWC tournament (they would likely not have gotten in with an at-large since their RPI was 67 and SOS was 227), then were blown out by Villanova in their only NCAA tournament game. Granger turned out to be McKay's only bright spot in 5 seasons at New Mexico, and Bradley was deprived of much better teams in 2002-2003, 2003-2004, and 2004-2005.
If anything has been proven the last couple years, it is that Ritchie McKay is a poor recruiter and is not a good coach. And that Jim Les is a good recruiter and a good coach.
I don't wish ill will toward McKay and Broussard. I wish them success at Liberty. Good luck trying to steal other schools players to Liberty.
Comment
-
I don't get it. What has McKay ever done to deserve getting all these jobs. It's not like he keeps piling up NCAA wins. He only appeared in the NCAA once and was blown out. His teams have mostly underachieved, but he's never been out of work. In fact, he's been one of the highest paid coaches in college basketball.
I wish I knew how he keep fooling people.
looks like he is updating his official website
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da CoachIt was mentioned at the bottom of the coaching carousel thread--
I don't think there are many here who "follow" Ritchie McKay. There are many Bradley fans who still harbor resentment toward McKay and Duane Broussard, as they contributed to talking Danny Granger into transferring from Bradley to New Mexico in January, 2003. That was right in the middle of Jim Les' first season as coach, and midway through Granger's sophomore season. Granger's transfer sabotaged that 2002-2003 season and the next 2 for Bradley and Jim Les.
Had there not been such repeated and numerous illegal phone calls from McKay and Broussard, Granger would have likely stayed at Bradley. Granger hadn't shown much in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley to that point, and there would not have been another Div I coach that would have taken him then. He would not have left Bradley and sought a transfer if not for McKay.
IMO, Bradley would have had a winning record in Jim Les' first 3 seasons, and pretty good teams in 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 with Granger, Sommerville, etc.
On the other hand, New Mexico would have been awful without Granger. They made it to the NCAA tournament in 2005 (Granger's senior season) with an upset in their MWC tournament (they would likely not have gotten in with an at-large since their RPI was 67 and SOS was 227), then were blown out by Villanova in their only NCAA tournament game. Granger turned out to be McKay's only bright spot in 5 seasons at New Mexico, and Bradley was deprived of much better teams in 2002-2003, 2003-2004, and 2004-2005.
If anything has been proven the last couple years, it is that Ritchie McKay is a poor recruiter and is not a good coach. And that Jim Les is a good recruiter and a good coach.
I don't wish ill will toward McKay and Broussard. I wish them success at Liberty. Good luck trying to steal other schools players to Liberty.
Comment
-
Lefty, I agree that most Bradley fans saw the potential that Danny Granger had. But my point was that in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley, what he showed on the court was not enough for other Division I coaches to be lining up to get him to transfer. I will stand by what I said, that if not for all the illegal calls by McKay and Broussard, Granger would have made his peace with Jim Les and stayed at Bradley for 4 years. Instead, when the differences occurred between Les and Granger, it became irreversible because Granger had Broussard talking in his ear on a daily basis encouraging him to split and go to New Mexico.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da CoachLefty, I agree that most Bradley fans saw the potential that Danny Granger had. But my point was that in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley, what he showed on the court was not enough for other Division I coaches to be lining up to get him to transfer. I will stand by what I said, that if not for all the illegal calls by McKay and Broussard, Granger would have made his peace with Jim Les and stayed at Bradley for 4 years. Instead, when the differences occurred between Les and Granger, it became irreversible because Granger had Broussard talking in his ear on a daily basis encouraging him to split and go to New Mexico.Onward and Upward!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da CoachLefty, I agree that most Bradley fans saw the potential that Danny Granger had. But my point was that in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley, what he showed on the court was not enough for other Division I coaches to be lining up to get him to transfer. I will stand by what I said, that if not for all the illegal calls by McKay and Broussard, Granger would have made his peace with Jim Les and stayed at Bradley for 4 years. Instead, when the differences occurred between Les and Granger, it became irreversible because Granger had Broussard talking in his ear on a daily basis encouraging him to split and go to New Mexico.
I also agee it may have been different if no contact between DB and Granger...I also think it may have been different if JL had been more experienced. I think he may have handled things differently too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BradleyBraveOriginally posted by Da CoachLefty, I agree that most Bradley fans saw the potential that Danny Granger had. But my point was that in his 1 1/2 seasons at Bradley, what he showed on the court was not enough for other Division I coaches to be lining up to get him to transfer. I will stand by what I said, that if not for all the illegal calls by McKay and Broussard, Granger would have made his peace with Jim Les and stayed at Bradley for 4 years. Instead, when the differences occurred between Les and Granger, it became irreversible because Granger had Broussard talking in his ear on a daily basis encouraging him to split and go to New Mexico.
Comment
-
Well for one thing it was JL's first year...huge learning experience. We had some good players the next year and didn't have great records.
There have been extremely few successful coaches who have had winning teams in their first few years, unless they are fortunate to take over NCAA-ready teams because the previous successful coach was lured away to another job.
I can post all the records of everyone from Coach K, to the best coaches in the MVC in the last 2 decades (Bruce Weber, Dana Altman, etc) if anyone is interested. None of their records for their first several years are very good, and few are any better than Jim Les'. Here are some of them.--
The bashing of Jim Les that went on non-stop from 2002 to 2006 always liked to dwell on his record, and stress that Jim Les took over a team that some said was "loaded with talent", which it was not.
Jim was even blamed for the departures of guys like Joah Tucker, and Antoine Tisby, even though those 2 said publically that they decided to leave before Jim Molinari was fired. And, of course, he was blamed for the Granger transfer, even though another coaching staff cheated to steal him away.
I am sure you will remember that there were very few of us who stood by Jim Les and supported giving him more time to accomplish what he was doing and get his own players in place. The starting of BradleyFans.com was brought about because a few solid BU fans were tired of all the incessant Jim Les-bashing that went on in other public forums. I don't feel that I have to defend Jim Les' record any more, as he has clearly quieted nearly all those critics. But I do not accept that those teams he had his first couple years were any better than what we saw. The 2001-2002 team (with the players that you claim were so good) lost 20 games under Jim Molinari.
Jim Les has never lost 20 games.
And he has won 22 games each of the last 2 years (his 4th and 5th seasons), now that he has teams entirely of his own players. What other coaches in Bradley's history, or in the MVC have ever done that after taking over for a fired coach and a 20 loss season?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Da CoachWell for one thing it was JL's first year...huge learning experience. We had some good players the next year and didn't have great records.
There have been extremely few successful coaches who have had winning teams in their first few years, unless they are fortunate to take over NCAA-ready teams because the previous successful coach was lured away to another job.
I can post all the records of everyone from Coach K, to the best coaches in the MVC in the last 2 decades (Bruce Weber, Dana Altman, etc) if anyone is interested. None of their records for their first several years are very good, and few are any better than Jim Les'. Here are some of them.--
The bashing of Jim Les that went on non-stop from 2002 to 2006 always liked to dwell on his record, and stress that Jim Les took over a team that some said was "loaded with talent", which it was not.
Jim was even blamed for the departures of guys like Joah Tucker, and Antoine Tisby, even though those 2 said publically that they decided to leave before Jim Molinari was fired. And, of course, he was blamed for the Granger transfer, even though another coaching staff cheated to steal him away.
I am sure you will remember that there were very few of us who stood by Jim Les and supported giving him more time to accomplish what he was doing and get his own players in place. The starting of BradleyFans.com was brought about because a few solid BU fans were tired of all the incessant Jim Les-bashing that went on in other public forums. I don't feel that I have to defend Jim Les' record any more, as he has clearly quieted nearly all those critics. But I do not accept that those teams he had his first couple years were any better than what we saw. The 2001-2002 team (with the players that you claim were so good) lost 20 games under Jim Molinari.
Jim Les has never lost 20 games.
And he has won 22 games each of the last 2 years (his 4th and 5th seasons), now that he has teams entirely of his own players. What other coaches in Bradley's history, or in the MVC have ever done that after taking over for a fired coach and a 20 loss season?
What gets me is why some of you still feel you have defend JL any time someone mentions his name?
I didn't say anything bad about JL..it WAS his first year....he was inexperienced..he IS a quick learner and is doing a good job.
We are all glad he's here....
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment