After watching the Mo. State-Winthrop game, I really question Mo. State chances of getting a bid. They basically got out played in all areas of the game at home.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Only 2 MVC teams in NCAA?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MacabreMobI agree that this is possible. Mo St is playing themselves out of the tourney and we certainly don't look worthy (yet).
Would be a shame for the MVC to only get 2 bids .... and maybe get a 7 seed and a 9 seed to boot.
As far as MSU, whew! What can I say? They looked completely outclassed in the second half tonight, and I can only imagine what the posters are saying about Hinson on that other board! It is good for us though, in that a win tomorrow night might put us ahead of MSU in the pecking order, at least in the eyes of some committee members. Even if we lose at VCU but win out in conference, we still look better then MSU does.
Of course if MSU wins their last two games, I think they're still in, but as a 12 or 13 seed at best. Still a lot of basketball to play though!
Comment
-
Selections
What I find disgusting is all this talk of ACC, Big-10, SEC, and Big (l)East getting 6-9 teams in each. What a joke!
There should be 3-5 Valley teams in based on both team and conference RPI alone. The committee needs to take at least one less team from each of these conferences to be sure no less than three Valley teams get in. (of course, conference tournament upsets will probably play havoc with selections this year)
Comment
-
Originally posted by real fanWonder how many years Barry has left on his contract as after tonight he has to be concerned about it as they were not prepared to play against that team.
Comment
-
Re: Selections
Originally posted by Braves4LifeWhat I find disgusting is all this talk of ACC, Big-10, SEC, and Big (l)East getting 6-9 teams in each. What a joke!
There should be 3-5 Valley teams in based on both team and conference RPI alone. The committee needs to take at least one less team from each of these conferences to be sure no less than three Valley teams get in. (of course, conference tournament upsets will probably play havoc with selections this year)
Sorry Vitale. You're a good person, but there is no way the ACC will field 8 teams into the tournament! That conference is just as messed up as the Valley, and some commentators are beginning to mention that!
Comment
-
Re: Selections
Originally posted by BravesfanOriginally posted by Braves4LifeWhat I find disgusting is all this talk of ACC, Big-10, SEC, and Big (l)East getting 6-9 teams in each. What a joke!
There should be 3-5 Valley teams in based on both team and conference RPI alone. The committee needs to take at least one less team from each of these conferences to be sure no less than three Valley teams get in. (of course, conference tournament upsets will probably play havoc with selections this year)
Sorry Vitale. You're a good person, but there is no way the ACC will field 8 teams into the tournament! That conference is just as messed up as the Valley, and some commentators are beginning to mention that!
I think the conference has gotten hosed in the past. We deserved five teams last year. No question. But lets look at this season. Make a credible case for BU, WSU, or UNI being a top 40 team in the country right now and therefore worthy of an at large bid. I mean up to today's action of course. I don't think it holds up. Tell me otherwise if that's what you belive...but talk about the TEAMS and what they've done to deserve it.
I just don't agree with the whole MVC is getting slighted argument...not this year. Maybe this silly ESPN event will go better tomorrow and I'll feel more optimistic.
I mean come on...top Valley teams are losing at HOME to the Big South conference and we are actually gonna compare ourselves to the ACC?
Just my honest opinion...I'll respect all of yours...I just don't feel more than three TEAMS in our conference deserve bids right now...and MSU might be fumbling the ball if tonight was any indication.
Thanks for letting me ramble. I've had a couple of soda pops tonight/this morning.
Cheers,
VromanFan
Comment
-
Fantastic work...MSU. Thanks so much. The Valley is officially a two-bid league now, unless someone other than Creighton or SIU wins the tourney...Berruh's Bears got humiliated at home on national television tonight by a team from the Big South Conference...lovely. So much for the 'Valley is a power conference' thing...ooops. And now it knocks us down a notch because we got smoked twice by this lousy, gutless squad that wet themselves at home tonight.
Oh well. The Valley had a chance to make a statement by winning 7 or 8 of these bracketbuster games...and right out of the gates, a game that was one of the 2 or 3 most winnable of the matchups for our conference...and it was a total mismatch in favor of the team from the Big South Conference....great work. Enjoy the NIT yet again, Berruh...cry and moan about how you beat Wisconsin one night 4 months ago...blah blah blah...I've seen this movie. The sequel is even more pathetic.
Sorry, had to vent. Go BU...
Comment
-
Here is what JPalm's got as of yesterday afternoon:
ACC
(Bid - Team - Conf record - [rpi])
M 6 Boston College 9-3 [25]
E 2 North Carolina 8-3 [3]
W 3 Virginia Tech 8-3 [19]
M 4 Virginia 8-3 [37]
E 5 Duke 6-6 [11]
W 9 Clemson 5-6 [27]
S 8 Maryland 5-6 [31]
M 9 Georgia Tech 5-6 [40]
S 10 Florida St 5-7 [33]
NB North Carolina St 3-8 [124]
NB Miami-Florida 3-8 [160]
NB Wake Forest 3-9 [115]
MVC
W 4 Southern Illinois 13-3 [8]
S 9 Creighton 12-4 [24]
E 12 Missouri St 10-6 [42]
NB Bradley 9-7 [44]
NB Wichita St 8-8 [76]
NB Northern Iowa 7-9 [90]
NB Evansville 6-10 [123]
NB Drake 5-11 [111]
NB Illinois St 5-11 [129]
NB Indiana St 5-11 [126]
Comment
-
Now, with Missouri State's loss in the BracketBuster, the Valley's best bet to assure 3 teams in the NCAA is for BU to win out,
winning tonight in Richmond, then two conference home games to finish 11-7, and if MSU loses their last two against WSU and unpredictable Drake, then BU would hold 3rd place all to themselves. Then if BU can either win or do well in the tourney BU would get the 3rd Valley bid.
This has been an optimistic goal that I have held for BU since before the season started.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tornadoNow, with Missouri State's loss in the BracketBuster, the Valley's best bet to assure 3 teams in the NCAA is for BU to win out,
winning tonight in Richmond, then two conference home games to finish 11-7, and if MSU loses their last two against WSU and unpredictable Drake, then BU would hold 3rd place all to themselves. Then if BU can either win or do well in the tourney BU would get the 3rd Valley bid.
This has been an optimistic goal that I have held for BU since before the season started.
http://www.bradleyfans.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5311
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dallas BraveOriginally posted by tornadoNow, with Missouri State's loss in the BracketBuster, the Valley's best bet to assure 3 teams in the NCAA is for BU to win out,
winning tonight in Richmond, then two conference home games to finish 11-7, and if MSU loses their last two against WSU and unpredictable Drake, then BU would hold 3rd place all to themselves. Then if BU can either win or do well in the tourney BU would get the 3rd Valley bid.
This has been an optimistic goal that I have held for BU since before the season started.
http://www.bradleyfans.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=5311
Comment
-
Re: Selections
Originally posted by VromanFanThere's a gap there we have yet to close...If our conference deserved 3+ bids out TEAMS would take care of business on their home court (MSU/SMS)....not lose in Cookesvile (Braves)...have more than one win against the RPI top 50 (Braves)...not collapse in conference play (WSU)...not totally collapse down the stretch (UNI).
...
I just don't agree with the whole MVC is getting slighted argument...not this year.
Cheers,
VromanFan
The Valley is a conference still in transition ???‚¬??? we???‚¬?„?re not there yet, but our foundation to build from is fantastic. There has always been at least 2 teams turned out each year that can the conference can be proud of when the tournament rolls around. But, what has allowed the MVC to separate from the other mid-majors is that the bottom tier of the MVC has improved dramatically the last few years in terms of quality coaches and players. What needs to happen now is for the top tier teams of the Valley to raise their quality to a new level, so that the gap between the haves and the have-nots stays in place. i.e., the bottom stays good, the top gets great. Parity can be bad thing when you want to tout your prettiest girls.
Another step for the conference to closely consider is moving to 12 teams. Two divisions of 6 and all teams play 16 conference games. You might do it with the current 10 - two divisions of 5 and each team plays 13 conference games. I haven't thought this all the way through, but a conference needs to win their non-conference games early on and avoid letting league play beat them up so badly that they can't muster the strength for non-conference foes later in the year. I believe MSU would have pounded Winthrop (like the sissy he is) if they would have played two months ago.
Among the top tier teams (even though they are consistently picked to finish in the bottom half), I think BU has a good chance to emerge as the Valley program that be consistently considered for top-25 preseason press. JL can recruit and coach, ESPN exposure for league has begun, Peoria provides a top-notch fan base and playing arena ... the BU program has a chance to enter Gonzaga-level territory in the next 3-5 years. Sign the next POB-like big man and the path is there for the taking.
Comment
-
Re: Selections
Originally posted by Dallas BraveOriginally posted by VromanFanThere's a gap there we have yet to close...If our conference deserved 3+ bids out TEAMS would take care of business on their home court (MSU/SMS)....not lose in Cookesvile (Braves)...have more than one win against the RPI top 50 (Braves)...not collapse in conference play (WSU)...not totally collapse down the stretch (UNI).
...
I just don't agree with the whole MVC is getting slighted argument...not this year.
Cheers,
VromanFan
The Valley is a conference still in transition ???‚¬??? we???‚¬?„?re not there yet, but our foundation to build from is fantastic. There has always been at least 2 teams turned out each year that can the conference can be proud of when the tournament rolls around. But, what has allowed the MVC to separate from the other mid-majors is that the bottom tier of the MVC has improved dramatically the last few years in terms of quality coaches and players. What needs to happen now is for the top tier teams of the Valley to raise their quality to a new level, so that the gap between the haves and the have-nots stays in place. i.e., the bottom stays good, the top gets great. Parity can be bad thing when you want to tout your prettiest girls.
Another step for the conference to closely consider is moving to 12 teams. Two divisions of 6 and all teams play 16 conference games. You might do it with the current 10 - two divisions of 5 and each team plays 13 conference games. I haven't thought this all the way through, but a conference needs to win their non-conference games early on and avoid letting league play beat them up so badly that they can't muster the strength for non-conference foes later in the year. I believe MSU would have pounded Winthrop (like the sissy he is) if they would have played two months ago.
Among the top tier teams (even though they are consistently picked to finish in the bottom half), I think BU has a good chance to emerge as the Valley program that be consistently considered for top-25 preseason press. JL can recruit and coach, ESPN exposure for league has begun, Peoria provides a top-notch fan base and playing arena ... the BU program has a chance to enter Gonzaga-level territory in the next 3-5 years. Sign the next POB-like big man and the path is there for the taking.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment