I can't figure out why ESPN does not show more valley games, especially when the only "better thing to watch" is Arkansas-Pine Bluff versus Southern and last week, who actually watched Samford @ EIU? Who cares when the games televised are between two losing teams in a one bid conference?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
ESPN TV=bias
Collapse
X
-
I would not mind watching games out of such conferences IF the teams are worth watching, not just some middle of the pack or basement dweller teams. If the game was against the top two teams in the OVC, no big deal. There are some good teams in these leagues, and it's good to get a chance to see them, but don't show me two teams with RPI's over 300 when I could watch an MVC game.
Comment
-
When ESPN signs the contracts with all these lesser conferences for Championship Week, they're forced to pick up at least 1 regular season game from the conference as well. By contract. So at some point, every conference gets an ESPN game.
With that rule plus all the big boys that need to eat, that doesn't leave much room for the Valley. That and the MVC has a contract with Fox Sports Midwest, so it isn't THAT bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ser_solaceI'd just like to see a Bradley game (or any Valley game) in broadcasted in real High-Def like some of the BCS school games shown on ESPN. Looks really cool.
Anybody know if the HD broadcast is an ESPN decision or does Peoria need to invest in the cameras itself?
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheAsianSensationWhen ESPN signs the contracts with all these lesser conferences for Championship Week, they're forced to pick up at least 1 regular season game from the conference as well. By contract. So at some point, every conference gets an ESPN game.
With that rule plus all the big boys that need to eat, that doesn't leave much room for the Valley. That and the MVC has a contract with Fox Sports Midwest, so it isn't THAT bad.
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment