Good reads on Brad Pitt

[newBUfan]

http://pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/trib/newssummary/s_434918.html

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06079/673349.stm

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06079/673347.stm

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/seth_davis/03/19/ncaa.day4/?cnn=yes

[BU fan]

Thanks, newBUfan. Some good stuff

Here is a quote from the first link I love (from the Pittsburgh press)-
If memory serves, there were two teams on the court -- and anybody who doesn't believe Bradley is every bit as good as Pitt is either delusional or dense.
Or just doesn't watch enough college basketball.
Some will ask, "How could Pitt lose to the fifth-place team from the Missouri Valley Conference?"
Two answers:
1. Don't knock the MVC. It has two teams in the Sweet 16.
2. O'Bryant didn't play in the first eight games and was benched with foul trouble in the second half of a conference title-game loss to Southern Illinois.
Move away from the center matchup and ask yourself this: Who was the best player on the court?
If your answer isn't "Marcellus Sommerville," try again....you didn't need Vitale or anyone else to tell you he was the most talented player on the court yesterday.
You just needed your eyes....
Pitt has better shooters than Bradley, and maybe more depth, but it had no answer for Wright....
Seeds be darned. This was no upset.

And more from the others-
Simply put, Bradley is the better team

The pundits will have their say on this game, as will the talk-show experts and their callers. But, in truth, no analysis is necessary. This one is simple:
Bradley beat Pitt, 72-66, yesterday at the Palace of Auburn Hills because -- duh! -- they were the better team.