A few thoughts about the tourney projections relative to the MVC that have been coming out lately. My point is, in summary, that the kind of year the Valley teams are having (to this point) 3 bids is about right to me.
According to the projections right now, we have WSU, UNI, and us outside of the bubble. Can anyone really argue with that? WSU has a losing record in conference, UNI is sliding, and we are VERY short on quality wins. DePaul no longer counts as they're proving to be no good. SIU at home was a good one, but we've been swept by the other two projected tourney teams from the MVC. UNI has beaten Iowa and SIU which is good and all but they've lost 4 of their last 5.
I think our conference is great. The competitiveness 1-10 really is amazing. But we sure have a lot of NIT-quality teams. WSU, BU, and UNI certainly still have opportunities to climb back into it. Maybe even not at the expense of the top 3...especially if SIU can be knocked off as they're resume is pretty strong.
The bottom of our conference would whup the bottom teams of ANY other conference. Minny would trounced in the Valley this year (sorry Jim). Rutgers might not win a game. But in comparing the MVC to the B12, SEC, etc. you also have to concede that we do not (yet) have a Final Four contender among us. Maybe that's the big difference between the "BCS" and the MVC, MWC, CAA.
Back to the top, if the MVC can get 30% of its members into the Dance every year that's pretty darn good. The B10 might not get to that level (may only get 3 out of 11).
I'm the first to complain rightfully about the scheduling imbalances that negatively affect Valley teams. But take us for example. We got an injured U of I team on a neutral floor and coughed it up. The Spartans destroyed us. We're having trouble protecting our home court. That incident in Cookesville. I'm proud of our season and they way our team has played. Way beyond expectations. I just don't think its been a Dance-type season. Hopefully that will change. We should be thankful that we're close enough to the "Bubble" to have a chance to climb over it. Honestly, I'm not sure we deserve to be that close right now. Maybe we're not.
So yeah, 3 bids sounds right. As of right now.
I'd be curious as to anyone else's opinion. Thanks for letting me ramble.
According to the projections right now, we have WSU, UNI, and us outside of the bubble. Can anyone really argue with that? WSU has a losing record in conference, UNI is sliding, and we are VERY short on quality wins. DePaul no longer counts as they're proving to be no good. SIU at home was a good one, but we've been swept by the other two projected tourney teams from the MVC. UNI has beaten Iowa and SIU which is good and all but they've lost 4 of their last 5.
I think our conference is great. The competitiveness 1-10 really is amazing. But we sure have a lot of NIT-quality teams. WSU, BU, and UNI certainly still have opportunities to climb back into it. Maybe even not at the expense of the top 3...especially if SIU can be knocked off as they're resume is pretty strong.
The bottom of our conference would whup the bottom teams of ANY other conference. Minny would trounced in the Valley this year (sorry Jim). Rutgers might not win a game. But in comparing the MVC to the B12, SEC, etc. you also have to concede that we do not (yet) have a Final Four contender among us. Maybe that's the big difference between the "BCS" and the MVC, MWC, CAA.
Back to the top, if the MVC can get 30% of its members into the Dance every year that's pretty darn good. The B10 might not get to that level (may only get 3 out of 11).
I'm the first to complain rightfully about the scheduling imbalances that negatively affect Valley teams. But take us for example. We got an injured U of I team on a neutral floor and coughed it up. The Spartans destroyed us. We're having trouble protecting our home court. That incident in Cookesville. I'm proud of our season and they way our team has played. Way beyond expectations. I just don't think its been a Dance-type season. Hopefully that will change. We should be thankful that we're close enough to the "Bubble" to have a chance to climb over it. Honestly, I'm not sure we deserve to be that close right now. Maybe we're not.
So yeah, 3 bids sounds right. As of right now.
I'd be curious as to anyone else's opinion. Thanks for letting me ramble.
Comment