Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Commission on College Basketball

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commission on College Basketball

    The Commission on College Basketball is a subcommittee of the NCAA that was formed last October "to fully examine critical aspects of Division I men’s basketball." It was formed after all the criticism arose from the FBI investigation that shined a light on the massive cheating by NCAA basketball programs. Condoleezza Rice was the committee chairman.
    They released their long-awaited report this morning, which everyone expected would address how to deal with and prevent such cheating.
    However, their report disappointed everyone. It basically rehashed a few older ideas, had no real solutions, and blamed the cheating problem on the schools, agents, and shoe companies, and claimed the NCAA was not to blame.
    The Commission on College Basketball, wanting to "be bold in our recommendations," wants the NCAA to minimize one-and-dones and ban cheating coaches for life.


    Summary of their report (my comments in parentheses)-
    1. There is a lot of cheating going on, which hurts the sport (no kidding)
    2. End the 19 year-old/one & done rule for the elite players (this makes sense)
    3. Players, including high schoolers should be able to test the NBA draft and be allowed to return to college if undrafted
    4. The NCAA should certify and regulate agents, and make them available to high school players to assist their decisions whether to go pro (not sure we want agents representing kids to go back to college)
    5. Need to deal with allowing players to profit off name & likeness, but need legal clarification first, so no recommendations were made (huge cop out)
    6. Harsher penalties for cheaters; They recommended a 5-year postseason ban for Level 1 violations (I don't see that happening to schools like Louisville, North Carolina, etc.) and ban individual cheaters for life.
    7. Paying players is not the answer (this I agree with), but there should be a way for players to benefit from the use of their names or likenesses
    8. The NCAA should outsource investigations of the most serious infractions cases (probably a good idea, because allowing the NCAA to investigate themselves if like the fox guarding the henhouse)
    9. The NCAA should investigate the financing of non-NCAA events such as AAU, and summer events, and greater transparency regarding money from the shoe companies (not sure how the NCAA can investigate or regulate private businesses)
    10. The rule requiring transfer students to sit out a year should remain intact (most people thought they would advise eliminating this rule)
    11. And finally, the commission said the responsibility for keeping college basketball clean was the University Presidents' and Athletic personnel's job, and not the NCAA's job (This seems like the ultimate cop out)

    The only recommendation that I think will help is to allow high school athletes to enter the NBA draft. That is not a new idea, but it would eliminate the bidding war by college coaches for the elite talent. It might be hard to get the top Power 5 schools to agree, since it will take a lot of their talent away from them.
    In the end, it is the NBA's decision to make, not the NCAA's, so it is a rather meaningless recommendation.

  • #3
    Reference #2 in summary
    One and done rule should be changed. Believe the NBA will try to block it. It is a form of an NBA minor league at no expense. Also important, it provides exposure of players who have behavior and or attitude problems.

    Comment


    • #4
      I am happy they didn't end the transfer-sit-out rule-
      it would have made the MVC a farm-system for the big boys

      Comment


      • #5
        Here is the expected response from the shoe companies-

        Comment


        • #6
          Originally posted by Da Coach View Post
          ...
          7. Paying players is not the answer (this I agree with), but there should be a way for players to benefit from the use of their names or likenesses
          The suggestion to allow college players to receive some form of compensation for the use of their names and likenesses has already been getting a lot of reaction, both pro and con. It would allow some compensation to go to players, but that money would by definition be distributed unequally. Most of such money, if not all, would go to the star players, and most would go to the players on the top teams that get all the publicity and who are on national TV all the time. I don't know if it might avoid the Title IX concerns that require colleges treat all athletes the same. But it is an interesting concept.

          Comment


          • #7
            What I like about this is they are admitting by forming the commission that there are things wrong. I have the utmost respect for Mrs. Rice. I think a separate group is the answer. Get away from the Good o" Boy network in the NCAA. Another suggestion. Keep this group together to be the ones who deal out the infractions to schools. They appear not to be tied to anyone. They could pay them compensation. NCAA has enough money for that

            Comment


            • #8
              I liked what they said in the Peoria Urinal about the Commission report. They are going to adopt it all. The part I did not like is it would go under review by the conferences and some conferences have more say than others. I thought oh here we go.. They are going to have the Costa Nostra review the Mafia. It should all be independent. Like they said in the paper the NCAA has the money to pay for independent supervision. The bigger Conferences wont like that

              Comment


              • #9
                rule changes coming from NCAA


                Comment


                • #10
                  NCAA will also initiate a couple other new rules that apply to transfers...

                  the most significant- that a waiver may be granted if there is a coaching change so a transfer won't have to sit out a year to play somewhere else.
                  Next week, on June 11, the NCAA transfer working group meets and will likely change the transfer model, but what will the new changes look like?

                  Comment

                  Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                  Collapse
                  Working...
                  X