Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Review of 2015-16 ATHLON College Basketball Preview Issue

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Review of 2015-16 ATHLON College Basketball Preview Issue

    I am a college basketball fan but largely a midmajor fan so my opinions are thus affected.

    If you like John Calipari, Mike Krzyzewski and all the east coast teams, then by all means this magazine is for you, because
    it's about 200+ pages that cover 95-98% just those big teams that get all the airplay. There's so precious little on any
    mid-major team or topic - LESS than even before, that I would never buy this magazine.
    A few somewhat interesting articles about recruits (only if they are going to big schools), newer court designs, the rule changes & speedup rules, etc...

    BUT - here's a review...

    the issue on stands in Peoria had Indiana's Yogi Farrell and the only name I could recognize among the dozens of contributors
    who might have been the one who wrote the Missouri Valley section was Wichita's Paul Suellentrop.
    BUT clearly whatever was written about or submitted regarding the MVC was so dated that it read like something that must have been
    written back in April or May and not updated or amended since........as I will describe.

    The section for the MVC was a grand total of TWO pages, buried deep in the magazine... not that it surprised me, but seriously...
    the big conferences and their egotistical coaches get 10-20 times more than the MVC, whcih over the past decade or two has
    kinda regularly kicked ass vs. a whole lot of those BCS boys.
    PLUS - One of the two pages was exclusively on Wichita State - and they are the ONLY MVC team picked to go to the NCAA -
    no at-large bids, and they are picked to go to the Sweet Sixteen.

    The other single page of MVC coverage lists things like players who have not been at the schools since last spring, and contains virtually NOTHING that is new since about April...
    thus the section on Bradley mentions there were a lot of players leaving - but doesn't even hint at the identity of any of the new players.
    The section on Loyola lists Roosevelt Smart as their best newcomer - even tho we knew Smart was NOT going to Loyola as far back as last April & May - LINK
    They also don't name a single new guy or fact about the Valley that has occurred since about May or June.


    ONE more thing-
    in the section discussing the new COACHING CHANGES..
    BRIAN WARDLE is included as one of EIGHT - "Mid-Major Names to Watch" -
    so this is pretty much the only thing about Bradley other than we exist in the MVC
    (Linc Darner, the guy who replaced Wardle at Green Bay is also listed)

    In the section about BAD HIRES & COACHES on the HOT SEAT
    they have Dave Leitao & Ritchie McKay as bad hires & Bruce Weber, John Groce, & Brian Gregory on the HOT SEAT, but strangely not Tom Crean.

    Impact transfers include Anton Grady (Cleveland State to Wichita State) and Conner Frankamp (Kansas to Wichita State)


    OK - on to what they say about the MVC

    Predicted finish:
    1- Wichita - gets the MVC's only bid & goes to Sweet 16
    2- UNI - seem to ignore lack of a big guy - no player returns with more than 3 rpg
    3- ISU - don't seem to think loss of Reggie Lynch will hurt that much
    4- Loyola - don't seem to know Doyle is struggling to recover from injury & Roosevelt Smart reneged
    5- Evansville - lotsa praise for Mockevicius not so much for Ballentine - wonder why?
    6- Indiana State
    7- Drake
    8- Missouri State
    9- SIU
    10- Bradley - expected this but of course they only mention Warren Jones


    All Conference....
    Ron Baker - Selected as PLAYER OF THE YEAR
    Devaughn Akoon-Purcell
    Fred Van Vleet
    Egidijus Mockevicius
    Milton Doyle

    That's it - sorry if it bores ya, but we kinda cover the preview magazines every year - this year really IS the worst MVC coverage I have ever seen.
    If it wasn't for Wichita, heck, we'd have probably gotten less coverage than most DIII teams - but then maybe we have this coming after where our crew has guided us the past 4-5 years... If you have any questions, PM me...

  • #2
    thanks for the review tornado..............................
    Athlon is and always has been the worst of the lot but is usually the first college basketball mag on the bookshelves so I always peek, snicker at their ignorance and put it back on the shelf; won't even bother with that this time around. Even in today's tech age where anyone writing for them could simply follow a team's Twitter or if they really want some depth for an article could easily scan a fan message board and pickup more facts and items of interest than they currently publish year after year. They don't seem to care or exhibit any professionalism at all. Oh well............que sera sera ?

    Comment


    • #3
      I used to buy most of them each year then save them on my desk 'til late in the season and go back to see which were the more accurate.
      From time to time they were all pretty accurate but then even a guy on the street can guess 90% of the time based only on recruit rankings and who each team has coming back.
      Their coverage used to be a LOT more fair to the 275 schools (85% of Division I) in DI that are NOT power-conference studs or perennial TOP Ten teams.

      But almost all the coverage has gone the way of the BCS- and even to just the upper echelon of the BCS with teams like Seton Hall, BC, DePaul, Wake, Vandy, TCU, others getting extremely little mention.....they just talk endlessly only about the teams with the 25,000 seat arenas, one-and-doners, head coaches who make $5 million+, and $200 million budgets! That's fine, but they've lost a lot of good, devoted fans who only ask for a little coverage!

      I have always been a Bradley fan but once lived in Louisville ('75-'80) - and even had tickets for my home team there during a National Championship Year (Darrell Griffith) - yet - I still always wanted to read about the little guys, the underdogs, the smaller schools...and those journals always supplied that...

      But now they have changed so much that it would be reasonable to just re-title them
      "2015 College Basketball 'Power Conference' Preview - with footnotes about a couple smaller schools"

      Comment


      • #4
        If Braves unanimous last place then would 6th or 7th be considered a huge success

        Comment


        • #5
          I would consider 7th place a huge success, and 6th place, which would keep Bradley out of Thursday in St. Louis, and would be the best finish Bradley has seen since before Geno Ford was hired, would be worth "Coach of the Year" consideration.

          Comment


          • #6
            Lindy's Basketball Preview is now out...
            I will have a little more later but of interest - they think Kentucky will the 3rd...behind UNC & Maryland.
            and to make their TOP 10 even more silly, they have Indiana at #4!!!!
            Heck - half of Indiana's starting lineup will be mid-major-caliber transfers!
            Wichita is #7


            Comment

            Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

            Collapse
            Working...
            X