After reading Kirk's column-
Wessler: Patience a virtue the Braves must embrace
A couple things stood out to me-
What the heck does this mean? (It's the 3rd paragraph)-
Can they mend broken fences with the fans; rubble that has almost as much to do with public relations missteps as losing games? Can they re-engage Bradley students, who’ve been mostly neglected as an important constituency since home games were moved off campus to the Peoria Civic Center 33 years ago?
"rubble"? What is he referring to?
"Public relations missteps"? Huh?
Is Kirk saying that what lead to 86 losses the last 4 years, attendance dropping almost in half, and one of the most poorly coached programs in Division I, was "as much to do with public relations missteps as losing games?"![Rolling Eyes](https://www.bradleyfans.com/core/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
First- What games was he watching these last 4 years? The losing and the fan defection was caused by poor recruiting, poor team play, and poor coaching. Why is that so hard for Kirk to see or admit?
And second- Isn't blaming "public relations missteps" a direct shot at Bobby Parker and the public relations people? How are they to blame?
Then- Kirk spends most of the rest of his column telling us how bad Bradley is, and that it's not going to get better quickly.
Why is Kirk just seeing that now? He's just spent the last 4 years shamelessly promoting Geno and his bad team, telling us how much better ("by a light year or two") Bradley is, and how things were improving under Geno, and how Geno was building things "the right way", how great the talent was, and how the team had such great leadership and depth.
It strikes me that Kirk has been wrong about nearly everything these past 4 years, so why should anyone put stock in his opinions now?
Wessler: Patience a virtue the Braves must embrace
A couple things stood out to me-
What the heck does this mean? (It's the 3rd paragraph)-
Can they mend broken fences with the fans; rubble that has almost as much to do with public relations missteps as losing games? Can they re-engage Bradley students, who’ve been mostly neglected as an important constituency since home games were moved off campus to the Peoria Civic Center 33 years ago?
"rubble"? What is he referring to?
"Public relations missteps"? Huh?
Is Kirk saying that what lead to 86 losses the last 4 years, attendance dropping almost in half, and one of the most poorly coached programs in Division I, was "as much to do with public relations missteps as losing games?"
![Rolling Eyes](https://www.bradleyfans.com/core/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
First- What games was he watching these last 4 years? The losing and the fan defection was caused by poor recruiting, poor team play, and poor coaching. Why is that so hard for Kirk to see or admit?
And second- Isn't blaming "public relations missteps" a direct shot at Bobby Parker and the public relations people? How are they to blame?
Then- Kirk spends most of the rest of his column telling us how bad Bradley is, and that it's not going to get better quickly.
Why is Kirk just seeing that now? He's just spent the last 4 years shamelessly promoting Geno and his bad team, telling us how much better ("by a light year or two") Bradley is, and how things were improving under Geno, and how Geno was building things "the right way", how great the talent was, and how the team had such great leadership and depth.
It strikes me that Kirk has been wrong about nearly everything these past 4 years, so why should anyone put stock in his opinions now?
Comment