Originally posted by wizard
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Act Immediately!
Collapse
X
-
Here's an article just today about hiring an Athletic Director..and what kind of person to look for ....
it's a long article that separates the obligations of big time football programs from small & mid-major schools - I have clipped a few lines below...
#1 MOST IMPORTANT factor they seem to highlight...
Hire a "DYNAMIC" guy with a "robust set of skills to manage these complex, multifaceted business operations" ...
then (scroll down in article) --
for MID-MAJORS ...should be a guy who can handle
"budgetary constraints...
...must contend with:
Funding their departments, many of which include non-revenue (sports)
...significant scholarship obligations, while addressing new legislation like full cost of attendance..
The best candidates, and subsequently the most successful administrators, are ... future leaders of college athletics..
..... intelligent and forward-thinking as they are bold and shrewd"
...(NOT) ...an introverted leader.....someone who is willing to work the backrooms instead of being the figurehead of the university."
So you want to be a college athletics director? Over the last several decades, the role of the college athletics administrator has changed dramatically. What once was seen as a job for retired coaches, has now transformed into a role that attracts some of the top executives both in and outside [...]
Comment
-
Leaked Information, not a big deal
Originally posted by Vent View PostWith the way this has been handled so far, if I was in a position to apply for the athletic director position and Bradley, I would probably have to decline from it.
Information being leaked in professional and D1 athletics is a fairly common occurrence (see ESPN), and in fairness there may be some folks that would use this as one variable in a multitude of variables during their decision making process, but in my opinion, I don't think it would be weighted very heavily.
Frankly, one of the reasons I read this forum is for the 'scoops' that other sites don't and can't provide so I hope to continue to see the story before the story.
Some folks feel like it's wrong to make something public before an announcement. I think it's wrong to withhold information and soften the story to save people's feelings. If no laws were broken and the 10 commandments are intact, was it really such an injustice? I think there are far more important things to get upset about than this.Larry Bird
I've got a theory that if you give 100 percent all of the time, somehow things will work out in the end.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tommy View PostAD positions at D1 schools are not exactly a dime a dozen type jobs, and if this particular one pays close to $300,000/year, I would find it hard to believe that anyone seriously considered for this position would decline based solely on some information that got out before it was officially announced.
Information being leaked in professional and D1 athletics is a fairly common occurrence (see ESPN), and in fairness there may be some folks that would use this as one variable in a multitude of variables during their decision making process, but in my opinion, I don't think it would be weighted very heavily.
Frankly, one of the reasons I read this forum is for the 'scoops' that other sites don't and can't provide so I hope to continue to see the story before the story.
Some folks feel like it's wrong to make something public before an announcement. I think it's wrong to withhold information and soften the story to save people's feelings. If no laws were broken and the 10 commandments are intact, was it really such an injustice? I think there are far more important things to get upset about than this.
I don't fault the poster. I fault the person that leaked the information. Obviously the person that posted the information did not know it wasn't for public information yet. Whoever leaked the information was somebody on the inside. If the information was about personel issues that were discussed in executive session and not in open session, that is violation of the "privacy act" and is against the law. It may have just been that the university had terminated the individual and wanted to inform the person before he read it in the paper or was told via a message board or from whoever. It is called dignity, class, professionalism or whatever you want to call it. Even though Dr. Cross did not have much success here, he is still entitled to be treated with dignity as he exits. Obviously the person that made the post took it down for a very good reason and I commend them for it.
Trust is a very important thing in life, at least to me. It is a hell of a lot more important than being the first person to let everybody know you've got first hand information and release it before you are authorized to.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Vent View PostI agree. The president and athletic director must be the right hires or we're doomed.
Personally, I think we just made a huge RIGHT TURN
Originally posted by Tommy View PostFrankly, one of the reasons I read this forum is for the 'scoops' that other sites don't and can't provide....
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment