Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

Peoria Journal Star

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peoria Journal Star

    What is going on at the Peoria Journal Star? Thus far, they seem to be afraid to do any kind of incisive, accurate reporting of the situation at Bradley. WHY?? The PJS has been provided the Bradley Resources Committee Report of April, 2014 which clearly delineates the magnitude and causes of the major financial problem at the university. Here are some of the things our newspaper has ignored:
    - The resignation of the Chairman of The Board of Trustees who also happens to be a very major contributor to the University. He has also apparently withdrawn his financial support. It is reported that there is now some degree of turmoil on the BOT.
    - A severe financial problem over the past few years that has grown to major proportions as reported by the BU Resources Committee in April, 2014.
    - Reported Annual losses in the Athletic Department of over $6 million and in the past few days, a report that this loss amount was actually over $7 million per year, but was covered up.
    - Financial problems were blamed by BU on "enrollment declines" and not on Ath. Dept. losses which were the real reason for the problem.
    - Losses have resulted in salary freezes, no bonuses, major cuts in academic department budgets and necessitated dipping into the university endowment.
    - Mens Basketball attendance has declined to an all-time low with a major loss of fan base.
    - Mens Basketball RPI is now 279 which is the worse in BU history.
    - No true assessment of the BU mens basketball team, talent, or coaching. The PJS Sports Department seems to want to avoid any real world, accurate reporting beyond what they are given by the coaches.
    - No assessment or reporting on the terrible record in Womens Basketball or volleyball. Why?

    The lack of any kind of in- depth reporting of these issues by the PJS is shameful and IMO an abdication of responsible and courageous journalism.
    Again, what is going on between the PJS and Bradley? Where is Phil Lucianno and why does Kirk Wessler seem to run away from any reporting on these issues? Supporting the home team and even some rose colored glasses are OK for awhile but eventually, the PJS Editors, Sports Editors, columnists, and reporters need to stop cowering , take their heads out of the sand and report like true journalists with some integrity and some guts!
    Wizard
    -

  • #2
    We've been saying it for a couple years. Now it is so obvious that everyone I talk to says the same things as you, wizard.

    There seem to be really only 3 possible explanations;
    1) Either the PJ Star writers have become completely clueless, and really believe things are just great on the hilltop. or
    2) There is some kind of cover-up/collusion/conflict of interest that explains why they have become a fully owned subsidiary of the Bradley PR department, or
    3) All of us fans are living in an alternate "parallel universe" where reality is not what we think it is.


    Which of those two do fans believe explains this phenomenon?

    Personally, I think #3 makes more sense than either of the other two options.

    Comment


    • #3
      recall, the current Chairman of the Board has said....and apparently he either believes it or is playing games with us...

      "As far as Bradley's overall athletics program is concerned: I think we have made positive strides.
      Last year was a record setting one for Bradley Athletics with the department achieving its best over-all athletic performance in at least the last 30 years.
      "

      I think this proves the doubly troubling issue that we are seeing terrible problems with all of Athletics - but the blame is being denied & shifted elsewhere and the Board is being fooled or misled with false information.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tornado View Post
        recall, the current Chairman of the Board has said....and apparently he either believes it or is playing games with us...

        "As far as Bradley's overall athletics program is concerned: I think we have made positive strides.
        Last year was a record setting one for Bradley Athletics with the department achieving its best over-all athletic performance in at least the last 30 years.
        "

        I think this proves the doubly troubling issue that we are seeing terrible problems with all of Athletics - but the blame is being denied & shifted elsewhere and the Board is being fooled or misled with false information.

        Note: this is about all sports (e. g. cross country, women's softball, golf, etc.) and not about the highest profile sport.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by tornado View Post
          Recall, the current Chairman of the Board has said....and apparently he either believes it or is playing games with us...

          I think this proves the doubly troubling issue that we are seeing terrible problems with all of Athletics - but the blame is being denied & shifted elsewhere and the Board is being fooled or misled with.
          Two possible explanations:



          OR

          BUilding for the Future

          Comment


          • #6
            but this is why they don't know what to do



            Comment


            • #7
              A picture is worth a thousand words!
              BUilding for the Future

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by wizard View Post
                What is going on at the Peoria Journal Star? ....
                -
                wiz...I thought of this thread as I was reading what's going on in Denver....if they just did a good job, people WOULD buy their product!

                Note in links below...one of the largest and most historically influential newspapers in the US (circulation over half a million!) is struggling so badly it's about to go under...

                they are laying off hundreds, buying out hundreds, reorganizing, seeking bankruptcy protection...etc...
                All the while other media outlets like Fox, Yahoo, Rivals, etc..are thriving and moving into the next millennium...

                The only people to blame are those who run the newspapers themselves for forcing their old liberal ways down everyone's throats...then complaining when people don't buy what they sell...

                The fact that newspapers are asking for government bailouts, fighting against their own unions, and ripping into other information sources like websites, bloggers (who are very successful and often don't charge a cent or even ask for pay) ...etc....
                DENVER — As a cops reporter for a corporate-owned newspaper in South Carolina, Noelle Phillips had already survived multiple rounds of layoffs before moving across the country in 2014 for a job at The Denver Post. Now, the spinning blade of corporate cutbacks is buzzing around her again. “It’s nerve-wracking,” she said after a demonstration […]

                http://www.westword.com/news/the-lat...-left-8009075#!
                Some members of the Denver Post newsroom staff are staging a rally on Friday to protest a new round of planned job eliminations at the newspaper.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The reason newspapers are losing money and subscriptions has nothing to do with the publication being liberal or conservative slanted. It is a direct result of people being able to get their news much quicker from the internet and 24 hour cable news/sports networks. Even the Washington Post (liberal) and the Washington Times (conservative) are losing money and subscriptions. The people that support each of their views are even dropping their subscriptions. The same thing has happened to weekly magazines. People may want to make into a political issue, but it isn't. It is a direct result of advancing technology.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    but who is marketing the news to them via internet?
                    Didn't the Denver Post or the PJS see this coming 10, 20 years ago - yet railed against it and stuck with their old ways, trashing the "new ways"?

                    Almost overnight, half of all the most valuable commodities and most valuable stocks to invest in are all internet ventures....
                    The media people were right there sitting on it - and even had people BEGGING them to get involved and develop their internet presence...
                    and yet most media in the 80's & 90's vigorously refused to do so arguing that they were set up to do it the old-fashioned way and that's the what they were going to keep doing it and people would just have to take it or leave it.

                    Meanwhile, the Google, Yahoo, and other internet sources - not to mention the commercial guys like Amazon, ebay, etc...and the social guys like FB, Pinterest, etc...
                    all thrived incredibly doing on the internet - exactly what the newspapers had always done for hundreds of years - but they were refusing to move to the internet.
                    Even Re: BU basketball - tho it's completely FREE - this site thrives while the PJS is a wasteland, pretty much always just cutting and pasting from here a couple days later....


                    And as for liberally vs conservatively tilted news products, all ya gotta do it look at msnbc vs. Fox to see what liberals have done to themselves...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      That doesn't change the fact, just about every newspaper in the country is down in subscriptions and readership. Maybe they all are making the same mistake you feel the Journal Star is. The reason the USA Today isn't selling nationwide like it use to is because people have changed their habits. They don't read the paper like they use to. Whether online or in actual print, people are getting it from other sources. Sources that didn't use to be available. There are only so many sources you need in competition. It happens in business at times and people evolve.

                      What is happening to newspapers is quickly happening to brick and mortar stores. People can go online in the comfort of their home and buy products instead buying at their local store. The downside to that is, if enough people do that, the local stores will close, and that will effect local property taxes. If that happens, it will once again fall into the laps of the local residents to foot more of the bill to maintain local basic services.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        and clothes stores are down in the number of Nehru suits sold, too....
                        I get it....people don't buy so many newspapers...just find the next thing to move on to...
                        If a store goes broke trying to sell Nehru suits, then whose fault is it? Should I get teary eyed when they fail doing things that are so stupid?

                        but we're still talking 500,000 copies...and many papers still sell 1,000,000 a day!!
                        Then look at all the advertising -- omg - surely the revenue is still there....
                        But still, my point was that most newspapers were hard-headed and stubborn about accepting the new way people GET NEWS - via the internet...they preferred instead to trash the internet and stubbornly refused to go that direction.

                        and instead of developing what they had the big lead on already, they resisted all along...

                        reminds me of Radio Shack....they were right there in the forefront of the electronic revolution in the 1960's & 1970's...they were the #1 radio and electronics store and had a presence everywhere.
                        Then when portable electronics, phones, wireless systems really became all the rage - they should have been poised to become the biggest commercial thing on earth...
                        BUT Radio Shack chose NOT to market most of that stuff - figuring they'd be helping Sony or Motorola become successful - (they stuck with their own hand chosen brands only) - so their choice cost them billions and now most of their stores are closed.
                        At least they don't gripe about how people just don't buy hand held LED calculators any more.

                        It's humorous, tho that some who defend the newspapers argue that it is SO important to have a free press that the government should use TAX MONEY to help bail out all the financially failing newspapers. Does anyone else see how ludicrous this idea is?
                        It's also important for people to eat - should the feds bail out failing grocery stores.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The revenue is not there for the papers anymore. Take a look now??¦.you have around 4-6 auto dealers(or dealer groups) in the paper consistently??¦.it's really been cut back on all traditional media too like TV and radio??¦..there are so many other ways to spend money for advertising purposes particularly online and there is just so much ad dollars to go around therefore these companies have to cutback and it usually means producing a less quality product

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by lefty View Post
                            The revenue is not there for the papers anymore. Take a look now??¦.you have around 4-6 auto dealers(or dealer groups) in the paper consistently??¦.it's really been cut back on all traditional media too like TV and radio??¦..there are so many other ways to spend money for advertising purposes particularly online and there is just so much ad dollars to go around therefore these companies have to cutback and it usually means producing a less quality product
                            You are exactly right Lefty. If you take away the auto dealers and the realtors, there are very few businesses that buy enough advertising space to support the cost of producing the Journal Star and other medias. I made a couple stops this morning and could not find a USA Today or Chicago Tribune or Chicago Sun Times. All of the places I stopped, use to sell them, especially on Sunday. It's like trying to find a pay phone.

                            Technology is constantly changing and changing quickly. As the new apps come out that allow you to block advertising, it will be interesting to see what happens to web sites that depend on revenue from advertising, when that advertising is no longer being seen or is effective.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Business models that rely on advertising revenues to survive will not work out into the future.

                              Millennials not wanting to pay anything for anything (see Sanders and Clinton popularity) and who don't care enough about knowing what is really going on, will spell the end of the 'free' press as a control of political/gov and business corruption.....

                              Information control is right around the corner...

                              But, hey, what about them Cubbies!!!! (and Giants) :-)
                              BUilding for the Future

                              Comment

                              Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X