Originally posted by bu fan 9
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconfigured Ad Widget 7
Collapse
Final: IUPUI 72 - Bradley 66
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Old Coach View PostHmmm…. I guess then I only remember hearing about the ones that ended up in the police blotter anyway.
And remember this?
College athletes tweet some of the most outrageous and offensive stuff. Let me know if you need any examples. Yet, Taylor Brown's case of a single naughty disrespectful tweet drew such mock outrage from the Jim Les haters club, which included the PJ Star, that it lead to repeated coverage by the newspaper and eventually lead to significant discipline for a nothing issue, that violated no laws or even team rules.
Maybe you think that needs to be dragged out publicly and does not deserve the privacy treatment like cheating on a test, missing classes, flunking courses, or taking shots at a frat party does?
Comment
-
Originally posted by tornado View Postdespite claims to the contrary, Brown did not break any laws, was never arrested nor charged with anything - but he did violate a team rule and NCAA rule - he paid a severe price for it..
....like a good, trusted employee being fired for failing a single random urine test at work - there are two sides to the issue but such cases are a sad reality.
Ray may not have been caught breaking any laws, but that's different.
Comment
-
Not trying to be difficult, I guess you can speculate but then I guess we can speculate about anyone and the laws they may have broken....
but tell me what law he broke...testing positive for cannabis, the only thing we can say with certainty that is a violation, is not illegal in any state
Ray Brown was never served with a warrant, arrested, and no cops ever even gave the guy a call or opened a case file, did they?
If it were illegal, then all those people - literally millions, of athletes, employees, and even hospitalized & ER patients who test positive would have cops breathing down their necks and prosecutors going after them - but they don't..
It may seem illogical or some technicality but it is as it is..
Comment
-
Originally posted by tornado View PostNot trying to be difficult, I guess you can speculate but then I guess we can speculate about anyone and the laws they may have broken....
but tell me what law he broke...testing positive for cannabis, the only thing we can say with certainty that is a violation, is not illegal in any state
Ray Brown was never served with a warrant, arrested, and no cops ever even gave the guy a call or opened a case file, did they?
If it were illegal, then all those people - literally millions, of athletes, employees, and even hospitalized & ER patients who test positive would have cops breathing down their necks and prosecutors going after them - but they don't..
It may seem illogical or some technicality but it is as it is..
Surely someone fed him tainted brownies without his knowledge.
Comment
-
well - I know the argument can seem silly - but the law presumes innocence even if people who hear about the case presume guilt..
but I do deal somewhat in my profession with issues like this and I can tell you there are at least seven or eight different ways that a person can test positive and not have broken any law at all.
I will PM you because I really don't want to make this into a long debate
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rhino65 View PostFrankly there's no need for anyone but Prosser and the coaching staff to know. Personally, I do know what happened, and it's nobody's business.
I've had my two cents worth??Śnow out of pennies.
Comment
-
Bradley is a private institution. Anything they promote or decide to comment on opens those things up for questions. They can simply choose not to answer or how much they'll answer. The press can either show righteous indignation, like the Journal has done in the past or treat the situation with kid gloves and not stir the pot. We'd all like to know what's going on with the situations with Prosser and Barnes but unless Bradley specifically comments on that specific situation it is supposed to be confidential. It's up to the Journal to decide how they want to pursue it.
Comment
-
Comment
Unconfigured Ad Widget 6
Collapse
Comment