Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unconfigured Ad Widget 7

Collapse

BCS members looking to separate from NCAA

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BCS members looking to separate from NCAA

    The Big 12 Comissioner recently suggested that bigger schools within Division I should form a "federation" within the NCAA to govern their sports-


    Suggesting a special convention might need to be called to achieve "transformational change" in the NCAA, Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby suggested Monday it's time to consider a new "federation" of schools with like resources ??“ and perhaps separation by sport...
    Bowlsby said commissioners of the five power conferences have "unanimity" on the subject.
    "Northern Iowa and Texas aren't much alike," said Bowlsby, formerly the athletic director at Northern Iowa, Iowa and Stanford before moving to the Big 12 a year ago.

    ACC commissioner John Swofford...suggested a separate division for the five power conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC).

    The gap in resources within college athletics has never been greater, and it's growing. An analysis by USA TODAY shows the average SEC public school's operational expenses in 2011-12 were $88.5 million, according to the most recently available information reported by the schools to the NCAA. The average Mountain West school spent $41.3 million. The divide is expected to grow dramatically with the advent of the College Football Playoff.




    What they are getting at with these statements is that the big schools are tired of sharing even a dime of the NCAA revenues with smaller schools. They want to keep mid-majors around in basketball, so they can play them during their pre-conference season, but they don't want anything to do with them in the post-season. And in football, they want the millions in TV and internet money all to themselves.

  • #2
    This would be the demise of college basketball. People love the parity now. That is why they make so much money during the NCAA tournament. They like to see the uppity big schools get knocked off

    Comment


    • #3
      every sport that has added new members, expanded into new markets, and added new "expansion" teams has thrived, grown in popularity and exponentially reached new heights in revenue and numbers of fans...
      The NCAA is as lucrative as ever --

      so wouldn't college sports be the same - far more popular with those teams all over, in smaller markets, etc???

      BUT in the few sports where the ultra powerful teams, and the real money-makers refused to include the "little guys", or threw the smaller markets to the wolves - they have not thrived - The NASL, the USFL, some of the women's pro sports leagues & of course if they held an Olympics and included only a few eastern bloc nations - then nobody would care who won what....that actually happened!
      You have to include the little guys - the smaller teams & markets - they are gonna learn the hard way unfortunately.

      Comment


      • #4
        I had predicted this (BCS conferences saying adios to the NCAA) a while back here on B-F.com... With the financial help from new Cable Sports Networks this could happen sooner than later... Takes all sorts of pressure off these school's athletic departs that the NCAA currently imposes, and, keeps all the money in the hands of the school's coffers. Rich get richer...
        BUilding for the Future

        Comment


        • #5
          It could also end those very embarrassing losses to mid-major colleges in the NCAA tournament.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by LongTimeFan View Post
            It could also end those very embarrassing losses to mid-major colleges in the NCAA tournament.
            that, and the mid-majors actually getting to the Final Four regularly and taking home substantial cash - are what really irks the greedy BCS guys.

            Comment


            • #7
              Below is an article outlining a case to be made against the NCAA by I-AA/FCS schools under the Sherman Antitrust Act in the Vanderbilt Journal of Technology and Entertainment Law, written by a former DOJ prosecutor, with a good recap of the history of NCAA antitrust litigation. Senators Orrin Hatch, Chuck Grassley and Tom Harkin were pushing action against the BCS and the Obama DOJ said they were looking into it, but that apparently fell by the wayside when the football playoff announcement happened (and, Utah admittance to the Pac-12 probably smoothed things over with Sen. Hatch). That seems to have inspired this article, and it could easily be applied to a Power 5-breakaway situation.

              Recent Blog Posts from Our Members The Right to Your Face: Privacy at the Intersection of Virtual Reality and Facial Recognition By Alexander McGrail; Photo Credit: Gina Tomko/Education Week + Canva So, You Want to Train Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) on Your Supercomputer? By Emma Stauber; Photo Credit: VCG via Getty Images State Regulations of A.I....


              I think the Valley, or most of the Valley, won't be walled off from the Power 5 when all is said and done. This may only affect football, but even if it doesn't, the Power 5 can't just form a cartel and separate (ie restrain trade via boycott) without a reasonable justification. Even if the "We want the ability to pay our players $4k stipends" argument is persuasive, they'll almost certainly be required to allow other schools with the ability to do this the chance to pay their players as well and join their club, and I think Bradley certainly could afford the extra $52k. If they extend the requirement to all the other sports maybe that could make a difference, but for Bradley and many non-football schools not on a shoestring budget I think that's doable. If their argument is not bought by the court and seen as the naked power/money grab/illegal boycott that it is, the Valley and other mids could win an injunction and the Power 5 could be ordered to pay treble damages... even face criminal penalties. So I wouldn't panic yet because non-football schools with resources like Bradley should be fine, at least initially, and you can expect the P5 commissioners to tread carefully. A school like ISU may be forced to make a choice between dropping I-AA football so they can afford to pay the required stipends at the Power 5 level, or being left behind altogether. It could easily see this causing the Valley to crumble and the basketball and football schools going their separate ways. Bradley, WSU, Drake and Loyola may decide to join with the P5 division in everything but football, while the rest may be left in what becomes a division 2 in a 4-division NCAA (or, the top division in an NCAA left behind by the P-5).
              BRADLEY BASKETBALL
              -2 NCAA Title Games
              -3 NCAA Elite Eights
              -4 NCAA Sweet 16s
              -4 NIT Championships

              Comment


              • #8
                End result-

                4 x 16 BCS Team Super Conferences (aligns up with MBB and FB Playoff System)

                Or

                6 x 12 BCS Team Super Conferences (2 Wild Card Entries Into Playoffs)

                Everyone else is effectively Div II or lower and don't collect any money
                from BCS Super Conferences
                BUilding for the Future

                Comment

                Unconfigured Ad Widget 6

                Collapse
                Working...
                X