Originally posted by Gary the Gargoyle
View Post
always lie and say they DO have addictions in order to have an alibi & get out of the charges?
Originally posted by Gary the Gargoyle
View Post
because then if he does know any facts about the case, then he is violating the very fundamental ethics of his own profession and it's unethical, unprofessional, and dishonest
...however - if he really doesn't have any fundamental knowledge of the case, then he's obviously lying...I really can't see any in-between.
Comment