For the 74th billion time, 20 win seasons have no instrintic value when we get to 20 just because of the CBI or CIT. In my mind he posted 2 20-win seasons, not 4.
20 is nothing but a round, pretty number. You used to be allowed only 27 games in regular season play. Now it's 28, with multiple games in non-con tourneys allowed to be counted as a single game. The value of a 20-win season has changed in the last decade, and I'm sick and tired of people leaning on "20-win seasons" as an arbitrary benchmark.
In a different regard, people trying to diminish the sweet 16 are morons.
20 is nothing but a round, pretty number. You used to be allowed only 27 games in regular season play. Now it's 28, with multiple games in non-con tourneys allowed to be counted as a single game. The value of a 20-win season has changed in the last decade, and I'm sick and tired of people leaning on "20-win seasons" as an arbitrary benchmark.
In a different regard, people trying to diminish the sweet 16 are morons.
Comment