I'm working on a bit of a project, and I decided I would drag this onto this board as an educational piece.
Every year, people wonder how corrupt the NCAA is for putting two mid majors against each other in the first round, trying to get rid of them...or trying to set up Kentucky/Duke again....or why they hate team X so much. Well, I'm here to explain how they go from S-curve to bracket, and why there is virtually no chance of manipulation in the entire process.
What I'm going to do is take the committee's S-curve, which was released on Sunday, and build my own bracket based on their S-curve. I will take you through the entire bracketing process and show how we arrived at this year's bracket. Hopefully this finally puts to rest all conspiracy theories once and for all.
Note: I will be using the committee's S-curve. We can obviously disagree on some of the placements, but the idea of this essay is not to argue the rankings, but to argue how to bracket once the ratings are set in stone.
At the end of this thread, I will have a complete bracket built, and we will see if there are any differences between this bracket and the actual bracket. I doubt so.
My hypothesis: once the rankings are done, the bracket builds itself, i.e., there is no flexibility in rigging matchups. And since the rankings are done with no knowledge of how they'll translate into the bracket, there is no way for the committee to set up any desired matchup.
Every year, people wonder how corrupt the NCAA is for putting two mid majors against each other in the first round, trying to get rid of them...or trying to set up Kentucky/Duke again....or why they hate team X so much. Well, I'm here to explain how they go from S-curve to bracket, and why there is virtually no chance of manipulation in the entire process.
What I'm going to do is take the committee's S-curve, which was released on Sunday, and build my own bracket based on their S-curve. I will take you through the entire bracketing process and show how we arrived at this year's bracket. Hopefully this finally puts to rest all conspiracy theories once and for all.
Note: I will be using the committee's S-curve. We can obviously disagree on some of the placements, but the idea of this essay is not to argue the rankings, but to argue how to bracket once the ratings are set in stone.
At the end of this thread, I will have a complete bracket built, and we will see if there are any differences between this bracket and the actual bracket. I doubt so.
My hypothesis: once the rankings are done, the bracket builds itself, i.e., there is no flexibility in rigging matchups. And since the rankings are done with no knowledge of how they'll translate into the bracket, there is no way for the committee to set up any desired matchup.
Comment