If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
This point hasn't been stressed enough--good catch JD.
When someone is secure in themselves and what they are trying to do they can remain positive and objective with their eyes to the future and having a plan.
Count me as one who has mentioned this point a few times already.
Oh, I wasn't comparing Les's and Altman's respective bodies of work. I was just trying to make a point on how long it takes for the average coach to turn a program around. That's why I don't think you can totally evaluate a coach's run at a particular school after just two or three years. Four or five probably is adequate, and maybe a little less if the team takes big steps backward. Just illustrating that Les's and Altman's first three years were more or less rebuilding years and could be set aside when evaluating a coach's resume.
But of course Altman was a far superior coach than Les was, but that's not a knock on Les. Altman is far superior to the vast majority of coaches in the game now, though we'll see how he does the next year or two at Oregon as well.
Got it....it will be interesting to see how Dana does the next several years at Oregon. I hope he does well
Comment