If this is your first visit, feel free to
check out the Frequently Asked Questions by clicking this
LINK.
You are welcome as a guest, but you will have to REGISTER
before you can post messages.
To register, click the link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Welcome to BradleyFans.com! Visitors are welcome, but we encourage you to sign up and register as a member. It's free and takes only a few seconds. Just click on the link to Register at the top right of the page, and follow instructions.
If you have any problems or questions, click on the link at the bottom right of the page to Contact Us.
I'm sure that the next guy won't be able to raise any money at all...probably won't even try to raise any money since the last guy did so well.
No one could ever hope to do any better.
Haha, you might not realize that you're sarcastic post is probably correct, JL brought funds into this university like no one before him, and likely not anyone after him. Very few coaches are as connected as JL and will be able to deliver NBA execs to donate large sums of money. I've said many times I don't mind that JL was fired, but what he brought in terms of fundraising is pretty much unparalleled for a university such as ours.
Haha, you might not realize that you're sarcastic post is probably correct, JL brought funds into this university like no one before him, and likely not anyone after him. Very few coaches are as connected as JL and will be able to deliver NBA execs to donate large sums of money. I've said many times I don't mind that JL was fired, but what he brought in terms of fundraising is [retty much unparalleled for a university such as ours.
People will give me crap all the time and say I was a major "anti-JL" guy, but I will say youre 100% correct there...
While I don't think he was the best coach for the job, he was in fact an amazing ambassador for the program as a whole and an outstanding fundraiser!
I don't think him being connected necessarily got recruits, but he was personable to the point where you felt like you should dig into your pockets for him....all the time, every time....
Thats not discounting what the next coach may do, but JL showed that his main passion was Bradley University....
And guess what, for all of those that want to talk one way or the other, THAT is his legacy, and will be lasting, coaching record aside.
People will give me crap all the time and say I was a major "anti-JL" guy, but I will say youre 100% correct there...
While I don't think he was the best coach for the job, he was in fact an amazing ambassador for the program as a whole and an outstanding fundraiser!
I don't think him being connected necessarily got recruits, but he was personable to the point where you felt like you should dig into your pockets for him....all the time, every time....
Thats not discounting what the next coach may do, but JL showed that his main passion was Bradley University....
And guess what, for all of those that want to talk one way or the other, THAT is his legacy, and will be lasting, coaching record aside.
I think we agree pretty much to a T on JL (despite the fact I thought he should have been given another year). This is why I am so upset at the way he was let go, to lose a person who was a great alum, who was truly passionate about the university, and bent over backwards to help BU progress was not even close to necessary. There were a number of ways the separation could have been handled better that could have kept JL close to the university.
In spite of what some people may say, I agree that the way JL's firing was handled does matter. I don't care whether JG personally likes or respects JL or not. This is Bradley and we are talking about one of the most popular and influential figures of the past 30 years. She had an obligation to handle this with an abundance of consideration and respect. As President of Bradley, JG owed that to JL but more importantly she owed that to everyone who has a connection with and cares about Bradley.
JL raised far more for those facilities than president glasser.
Athletics is only a fraction of the "Bradley Renaissance" vision. I doubt JL had much impact on donations for a new theatre, the combined Engineering/Business college, etc.
Anyway, I wasn't making a point about JL. The President was hired primarily because the board thought that she would be an excellent fundraiser and move Bradley in the direction that they desired (i.e.-the 21st century).
In spite of what some people may say, I agree that the way JL's firing was handled does matter. I don't care whether JG personally likes or respects JL or not. This is Bradley and we are talking about one of the most popular and influential figures of the past 30 years. She had an obligation to handle this with an abundance of consideration and respect. As President of Bradley, JG owed that to JL but more importantly she owed that to everyone who has a connection with and cares about Bradley.
I agree, but I think you need to take it a step further. The admin should also owe that same sort of consideration and respect to other loyal employees that are not in high profile positions.
I think most people agree with the admin's vision. However, of those that are close to the situation, not all are sure that the end will justify the means. Do you have any incite to offer that would persuade those people?
I have asked this question of multiple people who blindly support the admin, yet all I get is (crickets).
Comment