JW-Refs-Zone
I'm a 25 year season ticket holder at BU and wife is a 15 year season ticket holder at ISU -- we see alot of basketball -- bad basketball this year.
Here's my take:
Refs --Those three refs are three of the top guys that we get at the game -- you'll see them all deep into the NCAA and big conferences -- Big 10.. Sure there's a couple calls here or there but it goes both ways.
JW -- good 3pt shot when open -- didn't see it tonight because they had him posting up JE often. That's probably not his game -- but imo, he's too slow to make his own shot. But when he's open -- he'll knock em down. BU didn't lose anything by him going to ISU.
Zone -- Did we play any zone? ISU went 7 minutes without scoring at the end of Indiana State at home. I would have thought we would have laid on the zone late in the game since ISU has proven they can't shoot and it would have surprised them. I know hindsight is 20-20 but driving against a zone is pretty difficult -- I do understand we held them to 51 but 2 points would have made the difference.
The choice to not play a zone is the biggest factor in not getting the win -- again IMO. But remember, I've seen both teams play 15 times.
Opinions about the lack of a Zone?
I'm a 25 year season ticket holder at BU and wife is a 15 year season ticket holder at ISU -- we see alot of basketball -- bad basketball this year.
Here's my take:
Refs --Those three refs are three of the top guys that we get at the game -- you'll see them all deep into the NCAA and big conferences -- Big 10.. Sure there's a couple calls here or there but it goes both ways.
JW -- good 3pt shot when open -- didn't see it tonight because they had him posting up JE often. That's probably not his game -- but imo, he's too slow to make his own shot. But when he's open -- he'll knock em down. BU didn't lose anything by him going to ISU.
Zone -- Did we play any zone? ISU went 7 minutes without scoring at the end of Indiana State at home. I would have thought we would have laid on the zone late in the game since ISU has proven they can't shoot and it would have surprised them. I know hindsight is 20-20 but driving against a zone is pretty difficult -- I do understand we held them to 51 but 2 points would have made the difference.
The choice to not play a zone is the biggest factor in not getting the win -- again IMO. But remember, I've seen both teams play 15 times.
Opinions about the lack of a Zone?
Comment