Hi all,
I thought it would just be interesting to see how people rank their priorities on how you would consider the Bradley program to be successful. It seems as if there has been more bickering than usual lately and my hope is that this would not go into that territory. Honestly, this shouldn't really involve names of players, coaches or administrators.
Simply put, how do you rank the different aspects about Bradley on your importance list?
A ranked list would really shed some light on what I have wondered for awhile about how different people think - no right / wrong answers here. And, you only have a to choose a few, if you want.
Here is the list of choices I thought of (and I realize there are tons), though if you think of another, then that can be an option (oh and please don't combine some because that really defeats the point of taking a stance).
- Adheres to NCAA rules
- Minimal transgressions with the law
- Graduation rate
- Conference regular season championships
- Conference tournament championships
- NCAA appearances
- NIT/CIT/CBI tournament appearances
- Consistent winning seasons, without titles
- A loyal coach that you believe would want to stay at BU for a long time (10+ years)
- A coach that may bring you some success but might use BU as a stepping stone (5 year tenure or less)
- An upbeat, fast style of play that is fun for fans to watch
- A tenacious, early-2000s SIU style of play that plays more defensively
- Players who are well-spoken young men who those who follow the program can speak of highly (who may not have as much talent but exceed expectations)
- Players who are here to play basketball, might not stay all four years, skate by with average grades - but can help teams win more games with their talent
I will wait to post my list until I hear from some of the rest of you. Like I said, I'm just curious - I don't see a reason why this should turn into a fight. Like I said, just take a stance and list a few - nobody has it all.
What do you want Bradley to be?
I thought it would just be interesting to see how people rank their priorities on how you would consider the Bradley program to be successful. It seems as if there has been more bickering than usual lately and my hope is that this would not go into that territory. Honestly, this shouldn't really involve names of players, coaches or administrators.
Simply put, how do you rank the different aspects about Bradley on your importance list?
A ranked list would really shed some light on what I have wondered for awhile about how different people think - no right / wrong answers here. And, you only have a to choose a few, if you want.
Here is the list of choices I thought of (and I realize there are tons), though if you think of another, then that can be an option (oh and please don't combine some because that really defeats the point of taking a stance).
- Adheres to NCAA rules
- Minimal transgressions with the law
- Graduation rate
- Conference regular season championships
- Conference tournament championships
- NCAA appearances
- NIT/CIT/CBI tournament appearances
- Consistent winning seasons, without titles
- A loyal coach that you believe would want to stay at BU for a long time (10+ years)
- A coach that may bring you some success but might use BU as a stepping stone (5 year tenure or less)
- An upbeat, fast style of play that is fun for fans to watch
- A tenacious, early-2000s SIU style of play that plays more defensively
- Players who are well-spoken young men who those who follow the program can speak of highly (who may not have as much talent but exceed expectations)
- Players who are here to play basketball, might not stay all four years, skate by with average grades - but can help teams win more games with their talent
I will wait to post my list until I hear from some of the rest of you. Like I said, I'm just curious - I don't see a reason why this should turn into a fight. Like I said, just take a stance and list a few - nobody has it all.
What do you want Bradley to be?
Comment